Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have a simple question:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:09 PM
Original message
I have a simple question:
Edited on Sun Feb-11-07 09:11 PM by originalpckelly
If Iran is supplying these RPGs and EFPs to Iraqis, and it is directed by the Iranian government, why are they including markings on the weapons which might be traced back to Iran?

That really doesn't seem to make any sense to me. If I were running a covert operation like that, and I was specifically manufacturing materials for the Iraqi insurgency, I wouldn't include those markings and I'd also try and make my weaponry look like it came from another country.

It would seem to me that these people are really stupid if they're doing that. How common is it to use the Latin alphabet on Iranian weapons?

http://www.usatoday.com/news/pdf/iran-in-iraq.pdf

I want to hear other countries analysis of this information before we listen to it. There are probably countries in Europe with the ability to look at weapons and determine their origins.

I wonder if these weapons are being supplied on the black market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joneschick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. ummm. der
image here of finger to nose. duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. ???
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joneschick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. kind of a "no shit sherlock" kind of moment.
sorry, I may be rum impaired. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Oh, I get it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. The RPG's in that PDF are for a Soviet System:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The marking "AT" stands for Anti-Tank...
I'm going to look further to find out more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. HE=High Explosive
LOT 3 = LOT 3

Wow. Farsi seems to be a lot like English. I knew they are both Indo-European languages, but I never dreamed they are that similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I wonder why the markings are in English, is that standard practice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. If it's any help, US mortars are 81mm.
And no, it's not standard AFAIK for the munitions of non-English-speaking nations to be marked in English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. And Iran uses a different calendar...
I wonder, however, if they use the western system for their weapons.

In one of the picture comparisons, on page 11 of the PDF, it looks like the mortar casings have similar markings, but they are in different fonts, and one casing looks to have more info on it than the known Iranian one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Ah ha! Remember that article from a couple of weeks ago
...in one of the British papers about the weapons being supplied to Iraq from Romania? I've just looked and can't find it, but will keep searching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Please, I'm looking this stuff up to check it out and see if I can't find these weapons markings...
that would be wonderful, and if they have pictures that would be even better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. No pictures as I recall
The other article that mentioned the black market Romanian weapons was one of those great British ones where the journalist actually spoke with insurgents. It was more recent than the USA Today one, which focused on the Saudi funding of weapons for Iraq Sunnis.

I'll keep looking for the British article and any photos I can find of these weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Thanks, maybe we can bat this down.
It looks like Iran has a different calendar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Here's one article about Romanian weapons being smuggled into Iraq
...and who's financing it. Not the one I was thinking of, but it makes the point:

Saudis reportedly funding Iraqi Sunni insurgents - USATODAY.com
Updated 12/8/2006 7:29 AM ET

CAIRO (AP) — Private Saudi citizens are giving millions of dollars to Sunni insurgents in Iraq and much of the money is used to buy weapons, including shoulder fired anti-aircraft missiles, according to key Iraqi officials and others familiar with the flow of cash.

Saudi government officials deny that any money from their country is being sent to Iraqis fighting the government and the U.S.-led coalition.

But the U.S. Iraq Study Group report said Saudis are a source of funding for Sunni Arab insurgents. Several truck drivers interviewed by The Associated Press described carrying boxes of cash from Saudi Arabia into Iraq, money they said was headed for insurgents.

Two high-ranking Iraqi officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the issue's sensitivity, told the AP most of the Saudi money comes from private donations, called zaqat, collected for Islamic causes and charities.

Some Saudis appear to know the money is headed to Iraq's insurgents, but others merely give it to clerics who channel it to anti-coalition forces, the officials said.

In one recent case, an Iraqi official said $25 million in Saudi money went to a top Iraqi Sunni cleric and was used to buy weapons, including Strela, a Russian shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missile. The missiles were purchased from someone in Romania, apparently through the black market, he said.

snip...

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2006-12-08-saudis-sunnis_x.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. "I did not have Black Ops with those RPGs." - Commander AWOL
Edited on Sun Feb-11-07 09:30 PM by SpiralHawk
"I have a perfectly good excuse (as uusal).
I was busy having Black Ops with Jeff Gannon.
That's my story, and I'm sticking to it."

- Commander AWOL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. The markings on the RPG 7 have the wrong date format if I am correct...
don't the Iranians put the day of the month before the month? In other words:

"5 (for June) 31 (31st day of June) in 2006" would be the American style of listing a date.

The Middle Eastern style is "31 (31st day of June) 5 (for June) in 2006".

Secondly the fonts on the rounds look like they're different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Wait a second, they use a different calendar:
The year 1995 is 1373 in their calendar.

http://www.iranembassy.hu/economic_cbr.html

That's a document from the Iranian embassy about a document and its dating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Here is a Wikipedia article about their calendar.
I wonder if they use a different system of calendar for their weapons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. And "HECHO EN IRAN" is kind of suspicious....
:wtf:

Not buying it. sorry. wouldn't be prudent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. The other possibility is that the Iranian government isn't running a covert operation.
Edited on Sun Feb-11-07 09:40 PM by file83
Point is, so what if they are manufacturing weapons and that arms dealers are getting them to market (Iraq)?

Isn't that the entire point of the Military Industrial Complex?

Not much point in making weapons if you aren't allowed to sell them to war zones, is there?

The Iranian Government isn't doing anything except making weapons and selling them to dealers. The dealers decide who they will sell them too.

U.S. made weapons find their way to war zones and war lords all over this planet every day. Does that mean we need to hide the source of manufacturing on the product? Of course not.

Don't get me wrong - I think there is no lower form of business: weapons manufacturing.

But that doesn't mean I think any country that makes weapons should be a target for invasion. To do so would be to argue that the U.S. should be invaded by every nation on the planet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I agree, but what the US government seems to be implying is that this...
is a covert operation by the Iranian Qods Brigade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Yes, that whole powerpoint presentation stinks to high heaven
Just a casual look around the internet for 81mm mortar rounds in Iraq shows that our forces have been finding them forever, usually associated with Sunni insurgents or 'al Qaeda in Iraq'. Now why would Iran, a Shia state, be supplying the Sunnis in Iraq with arms?

The dates on those weapons are telling too, as you discuss. Besides the fact they're in English, they're in the American date format. Perhaps Iran has a secret enclave of American weapons manufacturers? Actually, seeing as the RPG-7 has been around for donkey's years, and our government has been surreptitiously selling weapons to many of these countries for just as long, the rounds could have come from ANYWHERE.

Only one appears to have foreign writing on it -- but whether it's Farsi or Arabic is conveniently impossible to determine from the bad photo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I know this is all very suspicious...
because quite frankly, it's almost impossible for us to know. Only third party countries with good intelligence services would be able to find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. And I have another simple question: Why are some in Farsi and others in English?
:shrug:

That would seem to be inconsistent, you'd think that they'd have a consistent scheme for weapons identification, if they are going to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. I imagine there are weapons in there from everyone, we need to get the fuck out, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
25. i sense a dan rather moment here!
way to go, originalpckelly

keep digging, folks, and lets feed info to Countdown...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. I think so, they put too much information out...
I might not be the one, because I quite frankly don't know anything about this, but someone who does will find out. I'm just asking simple and common sense questions, ones that need to be answered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
29. I wonder who "Michael.Sennett" is...
it's in the properties of the file.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
30. Even if these weapons ARE Iranian, remember the MEK
Remember the US has been doing business with the MEK -- an Iranian terrorist group which opposes the Iranian Islamic regime -- in Iraq since the invasion, sending them into Iran to plant bombs, destabilize the government, and bring back "intelligence" on Iran's alleged weapons program. It's perfectly plausible that the MEK are providing some of this weapons "evidence" to the US so BushCo can turn around and say they have proof of Iranian meddling in Iraq.

There's a lot of reasonable doubt here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC