I don't know about anyone else here, but lately I feel like I've been banging my head against the wall for the last 3-4 years.
We've had the worst president in our country's history, responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands of innocent people around the world. Our country is the biggest contributor to global warming and other environmental problems. Millions of people in our country are poor, sick, without health insurance. Our votes are being counted in secret by private corporations. I could go on... and on.
Like many, for the last few years I've been trying to do something about it. Thus far, I've been using all the tradtional methods I can think of to affect change. I write to my representatives, who are supposedly some of the best (Leahy and Sanders and Welch) but they seem to think impeachment is not an option. I've been trying to do something about the voting machines but the bill (HR811) got hijacked and stalled. I've got blogs, newsletters, websites. I've lost countless hours of sleep trying to do something about all this, like many of you reading this. My relationship with my family has suffered at times.
I'm starting to think that our greatest hope to turn things around, the 2008 election, doesn't offer much hope. The leading democratic candidate is a centrist who voted for the war, has significant corporate influence, wants to HELP the health insurance companies more than uninsured folks, by requiring everyone to purchase private insurance. I'm not convinced she can even win against a Republican anyway. The candidates I favor get ignored by the media (completely left off poll rankings) or are not even running (yet?).
I'm tired. I feel like I've been banging my head against the wall for the last 3-4 years. If Hillary wins I guess I'll vote for her but I don't have the undying support and countless hours to give to her campaign (like I would for Kucinich or Gore or possibly Edwards).
I got to thinking. Are we fighting on the wrong battlefield? We all want the same things mostly - justice, peace, equal rights, less violence in the world, and end to the war. Could it be that those in political power, along with their corporate influence, have just too strong of a grip on our government and no matter how hard we bang our heads in the political realm, they're not going to give it up? Maybe even if this or that particular candidate does in fact win, not much is going to change anyway.
Am I sounding defeatest? Maybe. But that's not the point of this post. I think that maybe, just maybe, all this groundswell of frustration with the system and those in power is a good thing, but maybe, just maybe, we're aiming it in the wrong direction.
I think perhaps that by trying to fix these problems through the traditional means (voting, campaigning, writing, ...) is not the only place we could be directing our energy. I think that perhaps by pointing our energy directly at the political process, perhaps we are fighting on thier grounds, with their rules, and we are destined to lose. Sure we can (and have) made a small difference here and there, but big trains like that don't change direction very quickly, and things are so bad now, we need change, and we need it fast.
I'm not claiming to have the answers, but I would like to offer something to think about.
In 1999 a study was conducted in which 4,000 people collectively practiced a form of meditation and focused their energy on non-violence in a specific geographic area (Washington DC). Their goal was to reduce violent crime by 20% over an 8-week period. The results of the experiment we pretty amazing:
The findings later showed that the rate of violent crime--which included assaults, murders, and rapes--decreased by 23 percent during the June 7 to July 30 experimental period. The odds of this result occurring by chance are less than 2 in 1 billion. Rigorous statistical analyses ruled out an extensive list of alternative explanations.
"This work and theory that informs it deserve the most serious consideration by academics and policy makers alike." Dr. David Edwards, University of Texas- Austin
"What we are looking at here is a new paradigm of viewing crime and violence." Dr. Anne Hughes, University of the District of Columbia"
http://www.alltm.org/pages/crime-arrested.htmlI'm no expert on this but I believe in the idea that there are untapped and undiscovered energies in the world. I believe in the power of the mind to change an individual's life. I've seen it happen with technicques like hypnosis and meditation. So why not the power of our collective minds to change the world we share?
Maybe if we take some of this huge amount of energy we are using to fight the conventional fight (in the political arena) against violence, greed, hypocrisy, and suffering in the world, and use it in another way, maybe, just maybe, we can have some kind of positive effect.
They say that when you're at the point of desparation, your mind is open to new ideas. Albert Einstein said "the mind is like a parachute; it works best when it's open." Maybe that's where I'm at. Anyone else here with me? What do you think about trying to use some "unconventional" methods to fight the problems in the world, and direct some of our energy to a different "battlefield" ?
--
Notes to consider before you flame or reply:
1) I'm NOT saying we should stop the political fight. I'm just saying we should try other things (like this) too.
2) Transcendental Meditation (the practice used in the above study) is one of many techniques that could be used. I do not propose the is is the only or best method to tap into the powers of the collective mind to affect change.
3) I'd rather not get into a big debate about whether or not there is a collective consciousness or whether or not something like this would be a waste of time. If you reject the idea that the mind it capable of affecting change in the world you have that right. I do not want to convince you of anything you don't believe in. For those who do believe, or are just open to the idea, what do you think we can/should be doing?
4) I realize there are already efforts underway to do things like this and I'm not the first to think of this or propose it. I don't think we need to reinvent the wheel and come up with a new "project" necessarily. Maybe we just need to tap into a project already underway. One thing I would say is it would be best to use the most objective, scientific, non-denominational, non-religious, methods so that anyone and everyone who wants to participate could do so without trepidations.
Or, I guess I could just keep banging my head against the wall.