A Chinese version of Jena 6 - selective prosecution

[lxwen85]

I am a Chinese in Canada, but I am having experience with criminal justice similar to that of Jena 6 in both Canada and US – I challenged the White supremacy in an university, being retaliated against, complaints dismissed, got set up for criminal prosecution, convicted by a judge, and meanwhile all the American and Canadian Whites and their accomplices who committed true crimes against me got away Scott free from their criminal liabilities.

Please visit my site for my story:
http://www.wliao.150m.com/
http://wanxialiao.wordpress.com

The Jena 6’s case and my case together have provided a live example of racial inequality in criminal justice. Just pick the issue on crime of “threats” from the both cases:
When a White person gets mad at a colored person, in public, to his face, calls to lynch him or to make him disappear, the government says it is not a crime, because either the White person did not have any violent acts, or he should have his right to free speech. But when it is the other way around, a colored person gets mad at a White person, and says “Then I’m going to die, and not only me, die”, in a government guaranteed secrecy, in reply to the government’s inquiry, the government finds him guilty for crime of threat, because, although you didn’t specify any person, you must have had that White person on your mind, so you meant to threaten him. Clearly, there are two sets of laws, and the difference is based on color. I have never seen a White got charged and convicted for making “threats” to a colored person, although there have been quite few well-known such incidents in Chinese community of Canada.

The following is an outline of my story:

The racial persecution on me started because I challenged an academic theory of a White professor, David Waterhouse of the University of Toronto that “the concept of beauty” is a “European concept”. After Waterhouse acknowledged his loss of argument to me, he retaliated against me with fraud on my grades, etc. When I complained, another White professor, James Cahill of the University of California at Berkeley and the Canadian government came in to his aid to cover up the fraud and his racial prejudice in his theory for him. They conspired a criminal prosecution on me in that I was set up by en entrapment for a bogus charge of “uttering death threat” to threaten Waterhouse at the Ontario Human Rights Commission (the OHRC). It was a fabricated crime plotted by an entrapment using the “confidentiality rule” of the OHRC, and despite that the Canadian Charter of Rights provides that testimonies before a tribunal cannot be used as evidence to incriminate any one, I was incriminated and finally convicted by a judge.

In the meantime, all the American and Canadian White perpetrators and their accomplices who committed felony crimes against me got away from their criminal liabilities. These crimes include: in US - perjuries committed by Cahill in a US federal court where I had a civil rights action against him; forgery of court document committed by a California Superior Court Supervisor Maura Ramirez; and death threats, threats of forced disappearance on Internet Yahoo newsgroups against me, and in Canada, perjuries committed by the OHRC officer Alan Strojin at my criminal trial, etc. Despite that all these crimes are all proven on written documents, and all the facts so accurately match the descriptions of these offenses by the criminal laws of the US and Canada, the FBI and the US Department of Justice, the California San Francisco Police Department, the District Attorney, all refused to investigate my complaints. In California, even the Grand Jury is in the tight control of the government, in that the Foreman was picked by the court, and the foreman controls what the other Grand Jurors would know, (in violation of California and US constitutions that provide a grand jury can only decide on a complaint as a whole by votes), and so the Foreman just simply made a personal decision not to investigate my complaint.

[Trillo]

1. This person just doesn't understand Education.

Dissent is not allowed. You listen, you repeat what you heard on tests. Disagreement isn't allowed, until you have the Phd behind your name.

[NOLALady]

2. Your story is the reason there was such an outcry and

large turnout in Jena.

The corrupt and unequal justice system brought the people to Jena to shout in one voice, ENOUGH!