Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ken Starr: Blackwater is "constitutionally immune" to lawsuit.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 03:48 AM
Original message
Ken Starr: Blackwater is "constitutionally immune" to lawsuit.
Edited on Tue Oct-02-07 04:16 AM by kurth
Read the gory details at
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/10/02/blackwater_bush/print.html

Trivia:
Blackwater Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel Joseph Schmitz's sister is Mary Kay LeTourneau.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Starr is a sociopath. He wouldn't understand constitutionality or morality
if hit punched him in the nose. He's like the rest of the repubic elite. Amoral, criminal, corrupt, and disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Punching him in the nose would be a good start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. go South
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. *LOL*
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. There is a name I hoped we would never hear again
Ken Starr, what an ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Pantysniffer is back!
I kinda missed the little feller. OK, not really, but I can see he's still as clear on Constitutional rights as he ever was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Republican Constitutional Rights:
Corporations got them...
... and you don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. It seems like every day there is a new outrage
committed on the American people.
Will it ever end?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bassic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. How does he figure that exactly?
Do they also benefit from Executive Privilege, while we're at it?

Ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. The GOP make up their own reality as the game goes along...
Edited on Tue Oct-02-07 08:01 AM by Hubert Flottz
they used to call that cheating. I guess everything Really Did change after 9/11! Looks like the GOP have let the terrorists ruin everything in America, including the Constitution and the rule of law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bassic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Looks like they have indeed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. What terrorists?
Edited on Tue Oct-02-07 11:55 AM by Hydra
The only Terrorists I've seen credible evidence of have dinner at the WH and at Bush's vacation homes.

I do love how they argue that the law doesn't apply to them, and people aren't screaming at the top of their lungs to exile them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. cheating, it's more like a different country all together
where crooks run free and women die becuz they missed their flight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
11. When there is no law to cover injustices

that leaves some very ugly alternatives.

Is he sure he wants to go down that path ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. Fuck you, Ken Starr! You are a leech on our Constitution and our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. Just because a Repub says something does not make it so....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
14. who gives a shit
what this drunk ambulance-chaser has to say. Ken Starr is beyond irrelevant now....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. Heh. What's really funny about that is The Government Contractor Defense
that he's basing his theory on (i'm guessing, because i can't find anything on the actual brief or Roberts' order denying the appeal) is from Boyle v. United Technologies, 487 U.S. 500, Scalia writing for the 5-4 majority.

I heard Fat Tony himself say that the one wrong decision that he ever wrote in his entire judicial career was Boyle.

That argument never stood a chance, Kenny boy. Swing and a miss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. So you mean if Bill Clinton had just taken a job at Blackwater, we could have been spared your
$80 Million Dollar Witchhunt?

Asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. But what if a blackwater employee holds up a sign saying "Bong Hits 4 Jesus"???
Sounds like an unstoppable force hitting an immovable object, to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. I hate Ken Starr but he's right about Blackwater being immune.
On the eve of the war, Shrub signed an EO exonerating all contractors of liability in Iraq. Then just before he left Iraq, Bremer signed his own order, restating that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. How does that make them "constitutionally immune"?
I don't see anything in the Constitution about executive orders. A good strict constructionist like Starr ought to be concerned about that. Oh, right, I forgot. Whatever the repukes do is okay. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. It's gotta be the Government Contractor Defense
There was a case called Boyle v. United Technologies that held that government contractors are immune from tort liability for defects arising from procurement contracts. From the article:

"Blackwater continues to assert that the state of North Carolina lacks jurisdiction in the wrongful-death lawsuit against the security firm. On Oct. 18, 2006, Starr petitioned Chief Justice Roberts on behalf of Blackwater, asserting that the company was "constitutionally immune" to the lawsuit. "If companies such as Blackwater must factor the defense costs of state tort lawsuits into overall costs," argued Starr, "Blackwater will suffer irreparable harm." Roberts denied the petition on Oct. 24. In December, Starr filed a motion to bring the matter before the entire Supreme Court. The motion was denied in February."


That argument was dead on arrival. Scalia wrote Boyle, and i heard him speak once where he said it (Boyle) was the only wrong decision he'd ever written. There was no way that argument was gonna fly. Roberts turned him down, and Starr couldn't even get 4 votes to bring it before the Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I didn't know EOs were immune from constitutional restrictions.
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. an EO is not "constitutional"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
22. BULLSHIT!!!!
:puke: :puke: :puke: what is he smoking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
26. BS:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
28. He is true slime but why do I think the Supremos will back him
all the way. They crap all over the Constitution as much as that murdering deserter does.

Mary Kay LeTourneau is from a very screwed up family...

Alyce
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. SCOTUS already rejected his argument...twice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
30. Financially immune is more like it. Prince's got the DeVos in his Family Tree.


"(...)


Prince's sister, Betsy DeVos, is married is the former Chair of the Michigan Republican Party and her husband is Dick DeVos, failed candidate for governor of Michigan and scion of the DeVos family, founders of Amway and major funders of Republican and conservative causes.

Amway is privately owned by the DeVos and van Andel families. And to give some sense of the scale of their political giving, according to a 2005 Center for Public Integrity study, Dick & Betsy DeVos were the fifth largest political givers in the country during the 2004 election cycle. Richard DeVos Sr. & his wife were ranked third. And Jay Van Andel was ranked second.

Let's just say they give some real money to the Republican party and its candidates. And of course there are the DeVos Family Foundations which give money to conservative causes.

(...)"

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/054744.php

See also his other connections. Methinks no Bush DOJ or any other Bush appointed court apparatus is going to prosecute these guys. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC