Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Threatens To Veto Bill Protecting Independence Of Inspectors General

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 01:01 PM
Original message
Bush Threatens To Veto Bill Protecting Independence Of Inspectors General
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/01/AR2007100101602.html?nav=rss_business

Administration Opposes Bill on Inspectors General

By Stephen Barr
Tuesday, October 2, 2007; Page D04

The Bush administration yesterday lodged a veto threat against a House bill that would strengthen the independence of the government's inspectors general.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.), would provide inspectors general with seven-year terms, let them submit budget requests directly to Congress and permit the White House to fire them only for cause.

In a policy statement, the Bush administration said it strongly opposes provisions in the bill that would allow inspectors general "to circumvent the president's longstanding, and constitutionally based, control over executive branch budget requests."

The White House also strongly objected to the bill's provision that specifies reasons for dismissing an inspector general, calling it an "intrusion on the president's removal authority."

Cooper's bill has been scheduled for a vote on the House floor this week and had seemed likely to move forward with little controversy. Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) is sponsoring a similar bill in the Senate, which includes recommendations by Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Joseph I. Lieberman (I-Conn.).

Inspectors generals are unusual creatures in the federal bureaucracy. At large agencies, they are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate and generally are asked to serve both masters. They are supposed to crack down on waste, fraud and abuse, preferably without causing too much embarrassment for their agency heads, usually political appointees.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. What do you expect from this asshole? He isn't going to budge
on ANYTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ho hum, Junior threatened to veto another bill.
So veto already. Republicans will answer for it in the polls next year. Like he cares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have to say....
...that the only thing that was surprising to me about this article, is the sponsor, Jim Cooper (D-MineWhetherIWantHimOrNot) and who is a dyed-in-the-wool Blue Dog. So Jimmy gets no support from his master even after supporting his damned war! The nerve!!!



K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC