Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Minnesota Judge Smacks Down Larry Craig

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 02:49 PM
Original message
Minnesota Judge Smacks Down Larry Craig
Edited on Thu Oct-04-07 03:16 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
Image

"The defendant chose to not appear and to enter his plea by mail just so he could avoid any
such publicly .....

In refuting almost every claim put forward by Craig's legal team, Porter wrote that Craig's
actions in making the guilty plea were well thought out and a planned attempt to shield
himself from the public scrutiny of his crime, which would have likely come to light if he
pleaded not guilty and fought the charges at a trial.

"The defendant chose to not appear and to enter his plea by mail just so he could avoid any
such publicly (sic), of record, inquiry into his conduct," Porter wrote, underling the last portion
of his sentence for emphasis. "He kept many of the facts out of the record in so doing. He
cannot now complain that he should not have allowed to take advantage of an approved method
to enter a misdemeanor plea."




http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2007/10...


on edit -copied story from Botany
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. nice post
Edited on Thu Oct-04-07 03:05 PM by Botany
It looks like I have seen it somewhere before ....

You freaking copied my post word for word even down to the #
of periods after the Judge's quote.

What is up with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. You Took Information That Was In The Public Domain...
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Res Ipsa Loquitur
In refuting almost every claim put forward by Craig's legal team, Porter wrote that Craig's actions in making the guilty plea were well thought out and a planned attempt to shield himself from the public scrutiny of his crime, which would have likely come to light if he pleaded not guilty and fought the charges at a trial.

"The defendant chose to not appear and to enter his plea by mail just so he could avoid any such publicly (sic), of record, inquiry into his conduct," Porter wrote, underling the last portion of his sentence for emphasis. "He kept many of the facts out of the record in so doing. He cannot now complain that he should not have allowed to take advantage of an approved method to enter a misdemeanor plea."

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2007/10/craig_guilty_plea_stands_on_re.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Bad Form is bad form.
and that was bad form on your part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. 'smacks down' or 'taps on'?
Edited on Thu Oct-04-07 03:01 PM by HypnoToad
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. he's prolly into that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC