Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Buzzwords for the Future?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 12:15 AM
Original message
Buzzwords for the Future?
There's a really interesting post over at the Center for Responsible Nanotechnology blog:

Buzzwords for the Future:

Openness - Can mean several things, including net neutrality, source code access, transparency, and general willingness to consider new ideas. Attempts by corporate marketers and government spinmeisters to co-opt the meme likely will be common. Right now, there is a huge issue brewing in the reassignment of a big part of the radio spectrum. CRN considers these to be crucial issues that could either complicate or simplify the creation of an open molecular manufacturing infrastructure as we've advocated.


Trust - When you get an email, how do you know you can trust that it's safe to open? How do you know that it's from who it says it's from? How do you know that an offered product is legitimate and not a knockoff, or that an online "service" company is not fraudulent?


Sousveillance - A word coined by Steve Mann to describe the process of bottom-up ubiquitous observation and recording as opposed to top-down surveillance; similar to Jamais Cascio's participatory panopticon, except a little easier to say. Imagine what might be done with cheap miniature networked devices -- several generations beyond today's camera phones -- in the hands of millions of people. No matter what it eventually is called, this will be among the most explosive issues of the next decade.


I've expressed concern over the fact that so much of the debate over the future is dominated by conservative think tanks, like the Heritage Foundation. Chris Phoenix and Mike Treder, founders of the Center for Responsible Nanotechnology are among the exceptions; they're definitely on the progressive end of the spectrum. They have the same concerns I have - that the emerging technologies be developed for the benefit of us all, not just the elites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC