Want to see why a fundy I spar with have not even dated yet?

[Archae]

"I agree quite a great deal with Coulter."

"As to the issue of women's votes, though I cannot bring myself to say that women should be denied the vote, I also cannot deny that women, by and large, have made a hash of suffrage ever since receiving it. For all the 60's BS about women and men being "equal" (by the liberal definition, identical except for some random plumbing), women consistently let their emotions sway their decisions more than men do. (And no, it's not "cultural" either--- women in EVERY culture and time period have done the same thing.) What can you say of a given group's alleged right to vote, when--- no matter how educated or prosperous or experienced they are--- they consistently vote by a large percentage for those individuals who represent their best interests the least? Consider the swooning female support they gave to Clinton--- a philanderer, sexual harasser, and accused rapist, who never once did anything to help any women anywhere....save to speak in support of abortion (which, I might add, the the women's rights movement once denounced as being just another means for philandering men to control women's bodies...oh, but for the lack of perspective of their forebears! )--- and their visceral fear, hatred and loathing of Bush.... who, by overthrowing the Taliban and dethroning Saddam, did more for women's rights in the world than the last 40 years of feminist activity by N.O.W. combined?"

"Women are, by nature, overcautious nurturers. They react with visceral negativity to aggression, risk-taking and competitiveness--- which is why men are the heads of households. If women ran the world the way their hormones dictate, we'd all still be wearing leaves and eating our food raw because the womenfolk didn't want the younguns playing with that nasty, dangerous stuff."

"Unfortunately, fewer and fewer women tell their hormones to shut up when they enter a voting booth. But, like it or not, they're half the human race--- so their perspective has to be incorporated. (Now, if liberals would settle for THAT, instead of demanding that the womanish worldview constantly PREDOMINATE...)"

http://rhjunior.livejournal.com/389309.html

Face it, what woman with any brains whatsoever would even WANT to go out with this misogynist, bigoted asshole?

[Lasher]

1. It's best that way.

The last thing we want is for him to contaminate the gene pool.

[Canuckistanian]

4. That's why it's called natural "selection"

Women will not choose to mate with a genetic defective.

[Lasher]

12. The Darwin Awards

A Chronicle of Enterprising Demises

Honoring those who improve the species...by accidentally removing themselves from it

http://www.darwinawards.com/

[gateley]

2. Ann Coulter, maybe? nt

[saracat]

3. Does he know anything about history? Does he know that the woman in Iraq were not repressed and were

doctors and lawyers? Does he know that in A fganistan the women are back to burkas? And they don't go to school? And the same is now happening in Iraq? But of course he wouldn't care , would he?And what was that Bush has done for women again? What an asshole. No intelligent woman would go near him.I have a cousin that thinks just like him.He can't get a date either.

[charlie]

5. That...

...and this:



I'd forgotten about that idiot. The trace-from-other-sources "cartoonist."

[LaStrega]

6. "I agree quite a great deal with Coulter."

That, right there, would be a quintessential deal breaker for me.

[Warren DeMontague]

7. Why you've not dated this... ...individual?

The operative question being- good grief! Was it even a consideration???

I suspect this dude isn't getting a whole lot of non-inflatable dates, period.

[charlie]

8. Maybe

they're put off by meeting his parents on the first date, which usually comes much, much later.

Can't be helped though... he lives with them. Really.

[Archae]

18. Not just that...

He constantly begs for money from his readers, is a die hard Ken Ham-type creationist, total religious bigot and constantly gets into arguments with other artists.

http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/RHJunior

[Warren DeMontague]

19. You know what's funniest about Ken Ham? His uncanny resemblance to Planet of the Apes' Dr. Zaius.

Irony Alert!

[trusty elf]

13. non-inflatable dates

Nice one!

[zanne]

15. I suspect this guy could be abusive, also.

RUN!

[kimmylavin]

9. Oh...

I'm sure he'll find some self-hating masochist to treat badly some day...

Saying that Bush has done more for women's rights because a war he started moved some very small parts of the world up to the 15th century (in a very convoluted and bloody way)? While meanwhile he has done more to destroy women's rights at home than any president in recent memory?

Saying its a bad thing to bring emotion into decisions? Yeah, the robot in the White House has proven that taking emotion out of decisions will help make everything better!

As for Clinton, the only thing he ever promised me was to uphold the Constitution and run the country well. That other thing? That was a different promise, to someone else, and it was between the two of them.

As for this "overcautious nurturer", I think Sally Field may have been on to something!

[distantearlywarning]

17. There's actually research out there investigating emotion vs. reason

in decision making. It's been shown that people who use "intuition" tend to make better decisions than those who stick to pure logic.

Also, there is a part of the brain that controls emotion in decision making. People who have had that portion of their brain damaged are generally unable to make decisions at all, and the decisions they are able to make are quite poor.

The OP should find some of those studies and send them to this guy.

Of course, he'd probably just complain about "liberal professor bias", as they always do when science disproves their crazy beliefs.

[shenmue]

10. That first sentence tells it all.

No further explanation is necessary.

[Swamp Rat]

11. Why isn't he fighting in Iraq?

[Archae]

14. I'm getting a lot of posts in my LiveJournal about Coulter, and his groupie.

This entry:

http://archae.livejournal.com/78215.html

Notice the Coulter phanbois (and maybe one phangirl) refuse to address the points?
And whine about my "hatred?"

[distantearlywarning]

16. And I bet you a brazillion bucks

that if he ever did meet a woman who was aggressive, competitive and risk-taking, he would be extremely threatened by her and demand that she get back into the nursery and kitchen immediately to work on her nurturing skills!

It's the no-win argument with people like this. If women aren't nurturing, there's something wrong with them and they should become that way immediately. If they are nurturing, that's just proof they aren't able to effectively compete in a man's world.

The only thing you can do with these neanderthals is refuse to date them, and warn your friends off too. And beat the living hell out of them in the workplace, at games, and at athletic pursuits, because it's fun to see how mad they get. And maybe hunt them down first when the war between good and evil finally comes. Oops...that wasn't very non-aggressive and nurturing of me, was it?