Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Obama is elected President... Should Affirmative Action end?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:03 AM
Original message
Poll question: If Obama is elected President... Should Affirmative Action end?
A repug on Washington Journal brought this up.

What do you think?

I don't think an Obama win would necessarily signal a major shift in race relations, although it would be clear that America has come very far since the 50s. Therefore, my vote would be no--it should not end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Affirmative Action is not predicated on the
success of one individual. Dumb question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I know that, but I've heard this idea of racism being eliminated, particularly
if we have a black president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. We didn't end it
when Thurgood Marshall was seated on the Supreme Court. We didn't end it when Oprah made her first billion. We didn't end it when Tiger Woods won the Masters.

Again, it has nothing to do with the success of any individual, so I don't quite "get" the argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. What is the turn of switch? I'd agree that we aren't there yet
But how would we know when blacks have equal access to jobs and society?

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. There are demographic and sociological
metrics that can tell us that. When African Americans have the same graduation rates, the same income, etc. etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. And women
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Of course
I only mentioned African Americans because that seemed to be what the OP was about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. How about when job applications with the names 'Shaniqua' and
'Antwone' are not routinely shifted to the bottom of the pile?

When suspicious store clerks follow white kids around the store as much as they do black kids?

When black burglars stop getting 20 year sentences while white burglars get plea deals?

When questions like this are asked and the response is "Huh? What are you talking about?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I think Monkeyfunks answer is better n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Actually, I agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. NCevilDuer
makes a good point. Studies show resumes with "black" names are ignored at a far greater rate than identical ones with "white" names on them.

That's a problem, and a more pernicious one to deal with because it gets to individual biases instead of societal ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I don't think it ever can or will fully end. It seems to be hardwired into the primate mind.
Distrust of "the other" was probably a very useful evoltuionary tools when we were primates scrounging on the savannahs a million or more years ago. Many who didn't have this innate mistrust were naturally selected out - to take the point to it's extreme - any australopithecine who didn't know not to try to pet the sabre-tooth tiger was likely not to survive long enough to pass their genes on - and in the cases of other austalopithecines, they likely had dangerous predators more dangerou, devious, and forward-thinking than any tiger.

But NOW, as with many other of our animal traits that we have not been able to put aside at least enough to guarantee a human future, this evolutionarily-selected trait works against us.

Don't get me wrong, I am not bringing this up to say that we shouldn't try to get rid of racism or to make equality for all regardless of race, creed, color, or orientation a goal of our society.

In fact, the belief that prejudice and racism, to some degree is hardwired into human consciousness, makes it even more impertaive that we continue striving for something which probably can never be 100% fully attained, for as we can see once the pressure in to evolve and move forward is removed, human societies rapidly devolve backwards.

As Imperial Amerika hads been doing since 12-12-2000, the day everything changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. Racism NEVER ends.. it just goes "dormant" for short periods of time
and stays underground until people feel "threatened".:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fightindonkey Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Obama Will Not Win The Nomination, and Affirmative Action Should End
or at least be changed dramatically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Affrimative Action should have had benchmarks to achieve or a timeline for completion
It is insane to continue this as an open-ended policy into the foreseeable future.

Let's set some benchmarks and make a timetable to end this. Affirmative Action has done great good for many deserving people (and, like any human endeavor, for some undeserved people also - Clarence, I'm looking at yoooouuuu-whhhhoooooo) but it should nto be permanent national policy.

Therefore, whether Obama wins or not, it should begin reducing itself preparatory to ending at some agreed-upon point (or set of achieved benchmarks) in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Affirmative Action is going to be ballot referndum in
at least 10 states.

Just as the Ban Gay Marriage was used to get out the GOP
voters---you guessed it. Affirmative Action is the hot
button issue along with Immigration. This is how GOP
wins election. At the last minute, bring out issues
which stir emotions to the gut. Get them to the polls
smd they vote GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I hadn't heard that... Oh my
That's so sad and upsetting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Last week Buchannan explained this on MSNBC
Ward Connerly is working the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnotherGreenWorld Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. Obviously not...
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. Didn't Clarence Thomas prove affirmative action not necessary?
:sarcasm:

One man (or woman) achieving a high position does not erase the broader sociological and historical implications of race (or gender) in this country. Doh.

But thanks for pointing out to me why the Republicans have liked to elevate the occasional black man (Thomas, Powell) or woman (Rice) to hoigh position: so they can argue that race and gender are no longer barriers in this nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
16. Where does Obama stand on Affirmative Action?
Affirmative Action isn't universally supported by all minorities, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. google is your friend
try it some time. B.O. on affirmative action:

"I want to make sure that today’s decision upholding affirmative action remains in force, and that the doors of opportunity remain open to all those who make up our nation.”

“This administration sought to slam the doors of higher education in the face of African Americans and other minorities. It’s a sad day for the cause of equal opportunity when the President of the United States, the land of opportunity, calls for the Supreme Court to rule against policies that seek to open institutions for historically excluded racial minorities.”

By the way, when you google search a topic, you have to learn to sift out the wheat from the chaff.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
21. Affirmative action should be improved/increased regardless of what happens in the next election
It isn't about any one person. It's about our society as a whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pingzing58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
22. Affirmative action should help every minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T.Ruth2power Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
25. No
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC