Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh Pelosi...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:04 PM
Original message
Oh Pelosi...
<snip>

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was in a determinedly good mood when she sat down to lunch with reporters yesterday. She entered the room beaming and, over the course of an hour, smiled no fewer than 31 times and got off at least 23 laughs. But her spirits soured instantly when somebody asked about the anger of the Democratic "base" over her failure to end the war in Iraq.

"Look," she said, the chicken breast on her plate untouched. "I had, for five months, people sitting outside my home, going into my garden in San Francisco, angering neighbors, hanging their clothes from trees, building all kinds of things -- Buddhas? I don't know what they were -- couches, sofas, chairs, permanent living facilities on my front sidewalk." Unsmilingly, she continued: "If they were poor and they were sleeping on my sidewalk, they would be arrested for loitering, but because they have 'Impeach Bush' across their chest, it's the First Amendment."


And...

Holders of high office typically avoid discussions like that because it makes them look, well, political. But Pelosi did not hesitate to plunge into the political, explaining that "it was so important for us to bring the president's numbers down two years ago on Social Security" because it discouraged Republican candidates from running for Congress. Pelosi may have realized that her words sounded too calculating, for at one point she begged the reporters' indulgence for her to "be allowed a partisan moment." She smiled at her joke, then chuckled.

The ready grin seemed at odds with other body language that suggested Pelosi was not having an enjoyable lunch. She ignored her salad and roll, then waved off the chicken and vegetables and left her dessert untouched. "The tea is fine," she told the waiter, taking her first sip more than halfway through the lunch.

But the smile had its uses. She smiled warmly while telling a reporter in the room that his story was completely wrong. She laughed heartily when somebody mentioned the awkward interview in which Whoopi Goldberg expressed a lust for Pelosi's husband. She grinned when mentioning the fight over children's health care. And she laughed while discussing how she has "striven" to work with Bush on Iraq. "Is that a word? 'Striven'? " she asked. It seemed that only the antiwar advocates had the power to wipe the smile off Pelosi's face. Speaking about ethics legislation, she boasted that "we have drained the swamp" in Congress and pleased government watchdog groups. "At last," she added, "some advocates from the outside who are satisfied."

<snip>

Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/09/AR2007100902006_pf.html

Damn Nancy... And I had such high hopes for ya.

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Advocates from the OUTSIDE?
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 09:08 PM by sfexpat2000
Outside of what?

Is that better than Monday when she called me an agitator?

That damn First Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU9598 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dennis Hastert was so much better
Unreal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And apples taste more like apples than oranges do.
Can you believe that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I make in my pants sometimes.
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The 'sarcasm' tag is your friend.
I almost had to destroy you. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. But you expect disgusting crap from a Repuke
Not a Democrat. That's why We The People voted for the Dems...to make a change from the Hastert B.S. Not for the same-old-same-old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. Like a big sack of shit better. What was better?
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 10:09 PM by lonestarnot
:rofl: His muffins? I can talk about my sister, but you can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Me too.
Seems we were hoodwinked. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. She's clearly frustrated on the war. She's in a tough spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. So, she's attacking her constituents.
Got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. She sounds aggravated, but I must have missed the "attack".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. She's marginalizing us by calling us "advocates from the outside"
just as the other day she called us "agitators".

That's just a stupid thing to do. She knows or should know better than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. I dunno, I might be alittle grumpy if somebody was camped on my lawn
she seems to wonder why the protests aren't being aimed at the Republicans. Sometimes I wonder that as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. If our rep was a Thug, we'd be at that address, I guess.
What a mess. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. So are we to assume she does not appreciate the value of American citizens
enjoying their first amendment rights when she doesn't happen to agree with them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Well, to be fair, if they're going into her garden, that's trespassing--NOT First Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Code Pink didn't do that.
And I LOVE the way she say they should have been arrested JUST LIKE HOMELESS PEOPLE ARE ARRESTED.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Nowhere in the article did she say that
She said if they were poor and outside her house, they would have been arrested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Edit:
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 09:30 PM by sfexpat2000
You may not know this, but poverty is being criminaized just now in San Francisco. They are making it illegal to stand on the sidewalk too long and Nancy was referring to that.

It's a big deal here at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I don't care who does it, the woman should get a little peace, privacy and safety
at her own home. Go sleep outside her office, for Chrissakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I didn't attend those actions because they made me uncomfortable
but, I back Code Pink's right to protest on public property.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU9598 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. So do I ...
but that does not include damaging property, littering, or being unreasonably loud in a neighborhood where people live and try to raise a family. Her frustration is justified, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Next time, she could just have a townhall meeting and save
her neighbors from all that hassle.

She's frustrated? At least she isn't DEAD like the service people and the Iraqis that have died while she told us to wait for the Betrayus report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #26
36. Better Frusterated than
Dead, nancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. I know..that was real tactful...
looks like the protestors are causing Nancy to lose her famous cool.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Fair enough and valid point but I think that she has not honestly explained
to us her reasons for keeping impeachment off the table enough that it quiets the feeling of impending doom with each day that passes while this country goes further and further away from the country most of us once enjoyed and was proud of.

I have heard what many have argued were the reasons discussed and debated on du many many times and yet I found not one valid enough to ignore the growing echo of Impeach Now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I don't understand it either, and I'm not happy with her about it--
but constant harassment just tends to create a "me against the world" obstinacy--if you give in to what you feel is undue harrassment and badgering, you'd feel like you were letting these forces get away with those tactics, even if you might be inclined to agree with some aspects of their positions. Just human nature. I do not advocate bothering people at their homes. Fuck, I HATE it when I am unshowered, still in my jammies at noon, and the doorbell rings, and it's the damn Boy Scouts selling their popcorn, or whatever. If my career was wheeling, dealing and negotiating with people at her level, I'd want some fucking peace at home too. For many of us, it's our only inviolable (is that a word?) sanctuary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. In that respect your entirely accurate that everyone should be deserving of some down time..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #30
45. Beginning with our stop lossed troops. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. True as well....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. I am the first to critisize our Democratic leaders, however, the press are the ones to be questioned
Where were they when the run up to this war was being made? Were they the objective "reporters" they should have been or proxies and cheerleaders for the administration the past 7 years?

THEY HAVE NO RIGHT TO ASK ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC BASE, WHO ARE THEY?

they aren't jounalists that is for sure.

Why don't they go bother bush at his lunch. Oh, wait, I have a better idea, why don't they go to hell


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Harrassing someone at their home isn't the way to change things
That kind of behavior is not okay and she has a right not to like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Fair enough. And I have the right not to like her enabling
of Bush's war AND her refusal to have a town hall meeting with her constituents for over a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
37. As a constituent, you have a special perspective. Fair enough in return
She represents you, and shouldn't be afraid to communicate with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. I apologize for posting mad as hell and I am.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. It's not easy being a REAL leader during trying times.
I expect that Pelosi mis-spoke, i.e: "some advocates from the outside who are satisfied". I do agree that it is wrong to go to her house.
Still, I expect that she would do more to counter Bush, such as killing Bush's draconian Soviet Styled spy-bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. If she'd had the decency to meet with her district
there would have been no need to protest outside her home. She refused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
27. Is there no way to put Pelosi on the table and get rid of her?
Her condescending attitude needs adjusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
31. good gods in heaven -- people are arguing about whether folks should go to her yard or not?!!!!1
:wtf:

howzabout the part where her answer was ALL. ABOUT. HER.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Yeah, "they arrest homeless
people, don't they?" :grr:(nancy)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. They're just being good little liberals. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. "Hey, you, get offa my lawn -- I have a war to fund!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
32. they....
"...would be arrested for loitering, but because they have 'Impeach Bush' across their chest, it's the First Amendment."

....testy, testy, testy....try doing the peoples business properly and you might not have such problems, nancy....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
38. Love the "advocates from the outside". Indeed. Outside the Beltway power structure.
We are the "outside" because she is not on our side, she is on the side of political aristocracy.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. The truth comes out under stress.
Were we "agitators" on the "outside" when we were phonebanking for her?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. People need to get over the false idea that it's Dems vs. Repugs.
What's really going on is that it's the DC power structure against the rest of us.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. i'm glad to see you on this thread. i really don't understand some of
these posts. someone upthread noticed her response to the base being angered over her failure to end the war and her answer was "ALL. ABOUT. HER."

no shit.

if i was in the neighborhood i'd be going to stand out on her sidewalk tonight. this bullshit response of hers just really pissed me off--to be honest i can't even stand to look at her anymore (i have acquired a pelosi aversion just as i have for bush).

again, i'm glad to hear your dissenting voice within this supposed "dissenting" group.
(this crap about well, if they were walking through her garden, well she really needs down time---wtf?? i say well, maybe if she'd put an end to this fucking war she could get some peace and quiet and even have a guilt-free night's sleep for a change. she's been looking a little medicated to me for the last number of months. but i think if i was in her shoes i'd be fucking medicating too! out of guilt!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
47. Opelosi. That's just north of Opelika.
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 11:38 PM by BuyingThyme
You can't buy booze on a Sunday unless you eat at the Red Lobster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. "Don't cry for me, San Francisco!"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Where's SwampRat When We Really Need Him, LOL !!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC