PNAC: "Going Soft on Iran:" Realists vs. Idealogues; Iran WMDs, and Al Queda IN IRAN.

[The Cleaner]

Damn, I can't copy and paste from this PDF document. But it is very interesting, worth a read. Basically it outlines the PNAC position on Iran, which naturally is "go get 'em, and NOW."

It claims a distinction between Ideologue policy and Realist policy, and pretty much eschews the realists (particularly from the Bush 1 Presidency). It claims Iran harbors Al Queda terrorists, and that Iran has secret WMD programs that it hid from the IAEA. At the end, it pretty much encourages Bush to take military action: get them before they get us. The same thing we heard on Iraq. Suprise suprise suprise!

Anyway they are clearly worried Bush is listening to the advice of the realists as opposed to their ideological/neocon views. Will the neocon PNAC policy win over the realists? That is yet to be determined, but if history is any judge, the answer would be a resounding yes.

NOTE: This document is from 2004, therefore they do not mention Ahmadinejad.

http://www.newamericancentury.org/iran-20040301.pdf
(PDF document)

[PDJane]

1. Oh, yes..........

And you need to read the document that advocates removing 2/3 of the world's population (please note, they didn't say how that would occur, but the US has gone back to research on biological warfare).

I detest these people, truly.

[AX10]

2. We must also purge any Neo-Cons from the Democratic party too.

These people are truely a danger to the world.

[magellan]

3. And there are a few of them

Here's a list of the Dems who serve/d as "special advisors" for The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD), a neoconservative think tank (regardless of their claim to be non-partisan; see the link for background info):

Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) - 'Distinguished adviser'
Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY)
Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY)
Rep. Jim Marshall (D-GA)
Donna Brazile

There are doubtless many other Dems affiliated with neocon think tanks like these.

edited for clarity

[kimmerspixelated]

6. Schumer, really?

I guess you don't know who to trust.

[magellan]

7. That's what the Right Web says

If you check the link in my post you'll see they appear to have done a great deal of research on the FDD and who's connected to it. (Or was at the time of writing; it appears to be about a year out of date.)

Remember too: we aren't supposed to trust the government. This may be just another example of why.

[madrchsod]

8. the correct term is neo-liberal

yes they should go away or join their brethren in the neo-con movement. i tired of the "white man`s burden"

[screembloodymurder]

4. Do you have a link?

I'd really like to read that.

[PDJane]

9. Go to the PNAC Website

And download "Rebuilding America's Defences"

http://www.newamericancentury.org/defensenationalsecurity.htm

“Advanced forms of biological warfare that can target entire genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically-useful tool.”
– Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz, in PNAC’s Rebuilding America’s Defenses

“Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world.”
– Dr. Henry Kissinger, National Security Study Memo 200

The biowarfare stuff is partly at:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=ROS20070205&articleId=4688

[kimmerspixelated]

5. That's a chilly thought!

:scared: