Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

True or False: Blackwater is the 21st Century's version of the SA brownshirts.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 09:49 AM
Original message
True or False: Blackwater is the 21st Century's version of the SA brownshirts.
I say True.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. False.
I wish people would learn more about history before comparing everything and every one to Nazis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudeboy666 Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Concur
It seems that any authoritarian tendency or action on the part of the opposition is automatically labeled 'Nazi' (or its derivatives).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. I carefully said a 21st century version of the SA
I didn't casually label them "Nazis"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. If they would learn more from history
Edited on Sat Oct-13-07 11:34 AM by seemslikeadream
they would KNOW they are the brownshirts

They have even turned on our own soldiers, how brown do ya have to get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. I know plenty of history
an extra-national military force serving the political interests of a group with clear fascist leanings

how is that not comparable to the SA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. You just scared me.
Ohmygod. I had not thought of that. I cannot get the image of the head of blackwater at the congressional hearings with that disrespectful smirk on his face. They have no regard for American authority or law. They are brownshirts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. False. Eric Prince would
have fit right in, but this isn't about ideology a tenth as much as it is about big bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. And SA means? Secret Army - Please spell out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. well the $$$ are near the top but...
You forget that Prince is a religious zealot and ideologue, and that trumps greed almost always. I haven't one iota of doubt that he would participate or gladly lead an overthrow of the government. Cheney and Rumsfeld have shown over and over that they grasp human psychology and simple history at a level near the chimps: they will never understand what they unleashed.

imo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimpy McCokespoon Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. You don't think Blackwater is about ideology?
Eric Prince is all about Rove, Delay, Gingrich and the rest who are trying to create a permanent Republican one party state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. Prince is an ideologue
his dad got Gary Bauer going, Prince aligns with Dobson. Scahill's book about Blackwater is good. In fascism, money and power are synomymous with "might makes right." Cheney wants his private military. again, Jesus Plus Nothing, from Jeff Sharlet, is an important article about this american form of fascism that is stronger than it has ever been. the kind during WWII wasn't so aligned with a religious block.

not only that, but, as noted many times before, Blackwater employs mercenaries from Pinochet's Chile, Apartheid South Africa... Prince apparently has no problem with hiring people who participated in death squads. Cheney, remember, supported the Apartheid Gov. until it fell. He's no great friend of Mandala's to this day.

no fascist movement is ever the same... there are distinct characteristics of one nation vs another that determine who aligns with fascism. In this country, as Sinclair Lewis noted, the religious right make up one of the most dangerous sects in this nation. Look at the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, too, and their coercion of non-fundies from officers.

to me, to say "x is our x" in relation to fascism is only to draw a parallel to something that people know of from history so that they can see the dangers of, say, a private military that is obtaining its own weapons, planes, trying to create outposts in the south, north (Chicago) and west (San Diego.) They are dangerous, and not just because of the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. you haven't been paying attention if:
a) you don't think Blackwater and Prince are motivated by an ideology

and

b) you don't think that "big bucks" ARE an ideology--it's all about power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, and the Marines are Bush's SS
because they clap louder

:eyes:


This was actually posted here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. Potentially true.
The foundation has been laid, but hopefully the recent spotlight on their actions and even more hopefully a regime change in 2008 will prevent it from becoming much worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. True.
Edited on Sat Oct-13-07 10:44 AM by backscatter712
Blackwater is a private army. The SA started off as a private army.

Too many people don't have a clue how close we are to totalitarianism.

Maybe the people who say "False" are right in that the volume hasn't been turned up as high, but don't think it can't happen. The establishment of fascism is an incremental process. We're just earlier in the process.

Bobbieo: SA = Sturmabteilung - the official name for Hitler's "brownshirts".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. WORSE. They answer to a single corporate CEO, not a government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. goons and thugs that would kill anybody for $$$$? hmmmmm nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. The republican administration COULD be called Fascist and they deserve the title
Fascism requires the government in charge to be in collisions or controlled by corporations. This administration definitely can be said that.I don't think there is any sensible person in this country does not realize the similarities of the bush administration to the Nazi regime. Every single thing they have done comes from the pro type of the Fascism government.

Religion.....
Censuring the media....
Dissolving most of the social programs..
Playing on so call patriotism....
Discriminating against certain groups....
AND NOW BLACKWATER...............

And I am damn sure there are plenty more. Calling the bush regime NAZI or Fascist is one hundred per cent. Disprove...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. collisions eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
12. True in a sense. Close enough.
They are not restricted by laws and are loyal to the administration. They are a private paramilitary. Many authoritarian governments have had a variation of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. But the SA was the ONLY Nazi Organization NOT found guilty at Nuremberg
The SA was more street mob than actual soldiers thus to compare them to Black-water is incorrect, the more likely comparison would be the mob that intimidated the Vote counters in Florida in the 2000 re-count (The SA job was to intimidate voters NOT insurgents)

Black-water is more like the Warren-SS, armed troops whose job is NOT to fight to contests elections, but to fight people who opposed the Nazis and fought the Nazis (Waffen SS like Black-water were noted for excessive violence against civilians and enemy soldiers).

For more on the SA see the following:
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERsa.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. That's closer I think. You are right IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. the SA were a paramilitary private gang of thugs
Blackwater is more sophisticated and, if anything, MORE ideological

but these are more sophisticated times and the religious zealots are completely out of control

I see your analogy, but the SS were an official arm of the state...of course, the "State" soon became personally equated to Hitler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. I dunno...private armies led by authoritarian Catholics certainly predates the Nazis...
welcome to the fucking middle ages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. LOL
and it ain't funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. No, that would be the YOUNG REPUBLICANS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThePowerofWill Donating Member (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. I say false.
Blackwater is more akin to say the Pinkerton's of the 1800's. Think of the old robber baron days and how they used private security as their own little armies. Not the SA, but a sample of the regressive era leading us back to the golden age of the industrialist.

I have been getting very concerned at the wealthy, and the way they can hire security. This hired security can seriously fuck you up, and just be doing their job in the eyes of the law.

Ah, GOP policy dragging us back to the 1800's-early 1900's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Yep. For many years I thought they were trying to drag us back to the 50s.
It's finally become apparent that they are trying to drag us back to the Gilded Age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThePowerofWill Donating Member (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Thats what their after the "Gilded Age".
The 50's were much too progressive for them. Strong unions, emerging middle class, beginning of the civil rights movement, all that middle classdom allowing so many more to attend college, which fueled what we saw in the 60's. No they don't want the 50's again.

The thing i find funny is this. There have been two great Repub Presidents i admire greatly Lincoln, and T. Roosevelt. Lincoln ended slavery in the South, Roosevelt began the dismantling of corporate power. The Repub's of this day are working furiously too undo the work of their two greatest representatives.

I've been saying this for awhile. The GOP's new motto should be "The Republican party draggin America back 100 yrs."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. more like the dark ages
the actual powers used the jingoistic bigoted idiots who DO want us to go back to the "safe white 50's" to get raygun elected.

they used the note-quite-uber-wealthy who DO want a return to the 1880's or 1920's to get bush into power.

the real agenda, though, is a return to a time more akin to the feudal dark ages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThePowerofWill Donating Member (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Something i found funny in your remark.
The "safe white 50's" So few realize those "safe white 50's" are/were a media driven fantasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. hence the quotation marks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. they are descendants of the Pinkertons
but much more military

and being used in foreign occupation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThePowerofWill Donating Member (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. I'll agree with that point about being a bit more militaristic.
The foreign use.....well it is the 21st century gotta think on a global level. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. And there are South Africans
amongs them too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
35. True. All they need to do is wear little skull & bones lapel pins, and voila!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stimbox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
37. Mostly true.
Edited on Mon Oct-15-07 10:39 AM by stimbox
More like Italy's Blackshirts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
38. Well, yes they are in fact. The psycho-in-chief's very own PRIVATE military.
What else could they be called? Blackwater/Brownshirts....

In 1921 Adolf Hitler formed his own private army called Sturm Abteilung (Storm Section). The SA (also known as stormtroopers or brownshirts) were instructed to disrupt the meetings of political opponents and to protect Hitler from revenge attacks. Captain Ernst Roehm of the Bavarian Army played an important role in recruiting these men, and became the SA's first leader.

Hitler's stormtroopers were often former members of the Freikorps (right-wing private armies who flourished during the period that followed the First World War) and had considerable experience in using violence against their rivals.

The SA wore grey jackets, brown shirts (khaki shirts originally intended for soldiers in Africa but purchased in bulk from the German Army by the Nazi Party), swastika armbands, ski-caps, knee-breeches, thick woolen socks and combat boots. Accompanied by bands of musicians and carrying swastika flags, they would parade through the streets of Munich. At the end of the march Hitler would make one of his passionate speeches that encouraged his supporters to carry out acts of violence against Jews and his left-wing political opponents.


When Ernst Roehm left Germany to work in Bolivia in 1925, Heinrich Himmler took over the leadership of the SA. However, in 1931 Hitler recalled Roehm to Germany and asked him to head the SA. In just over a year Roehm expanded it from 70,000 to 170,000 members. By 1934 the SA had grown to 4,500,000 men.

In 1933, General Werner von Blomberg, Hitler's minister of war, and Walther von Reichenau, chief liaison officer between the German Army and the Nazi Party, became increasingly concerned about the growing power of the SA. Ernst Roehm had been given a seat on the National Defence Council and began to demand more say over military matters. On 2nd October 1933, Roehm sent a letter to Reichenau that said: "I regard the Reichswehr now only as a training school for the German people. The conduct of war, and therefore of mobilization as well, in the future is the task of the SA.<snip>

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERsa.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-15-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
39. Illegal combatants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC