Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why don't they just rename the Nobel economics prize the Ronald Reagan-Milton Friedman prize?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 12:12 AM
Original message
Why don't they just rename the Nobel economics prize the Ronald Reagan-Milton Friedman prize?
Nobel in economics yet another for University of Chicago
The Associated Press
Monday, October 15, 2007

CHICAGO: One of the world's most influential schools of economics has done it again. The nearly 120-year-old University of Chicago, once the academic home of free-market advocates such as Milton Friedman, can boast of yet another Nobel prize in economics.

With Monday's naming of University of Chicago professor Roger B. Myerson as one of three winners of this year's prize, the school claims ties to 24 Nobel prize winners in economics — more than a third of the 61 individuals so honored since the first Nobel in the field was given in 1969... "Good ideas eventually get recognized, and Chicago has produced more than any other university," said David Boaz, an executive vice president at the Cato Institute, a free-market oriented think tank in Washington, D.C.

Part of the explanation for the school's influence and fame in recent decades is that many of its economists — like Friedman, who won in 1976 — began advocating free-market prescriptions as far back as the mid-20th century, when the notion of unfettered markets was distinctly out of favor in government and academia. So when movements to reduce the role of government in the economy began to take hold in the '70s and '80s, led by politicians like Ronald Reagan, the stature of University of Chicago economists like Friedman soared.

Today, policy makers in fledgling markets from Eastern Europe to China look for guidance to "the Chicago school," a direct reference to the University of Chicago and the hands-off economic policies many of its economists have promoted...

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/10/15/business/NA-FIN-US-Nobel-Economics-Chicago.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ehhh, it's not really a Nobel Prize anyway.
Edited on Tue Oct-16-07 12:22 AM by tuvor
Unlike the physics, chemistry, medicine, literature, and peace prizes, a prize for economics was never requested by Alfred Nobel in his will. The award was established some 70 years after his death by the Bank of Sweden on its 300th anniversary in 1968. The prize is awarded by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences...

(snip)

The prestige of the prize derives in part from its association with the awards created by Alfred Nobel's will, an association which has often been a source of controversy. Among the most vocal critics of the economics prize is the Swedish human rights lawyer Peter Nobel, who is a great-grandnephew of Alfred Nobel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize_in_Economics

You can listen to an interview with Peter Nobel from an episode of CBC's The Current from last week: http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/2007/200710/20071009.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty quoin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Didn't know that. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Good info. Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. As I noted on another thread, over half the winners have been
Americans, almost all conservative Americans.

No women have ever won, either, unlike the other prizes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TimBean Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. What's wrong with the winner?
Please explain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Rabble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Pretty simple.
What the winner advocates, as do all of "the Chicago school" people is absolutely NOT "free market" anything. They specifically advocate for heavy government intervention in the markets, but rather than for the good of people, it is done for the good of the rich and powerful; the corporations.

You need only look at what has been done in the US over the last 30 years to see this in action. Our economy is largely Pentagon based. It is a system whereby the taxpayer pays all of the research and development costs, and once a technology becomes viable, it is turned over to private corporations for profit.

Aerospace, Internet, Computers, etc....

So, the problem with the "free market" ideologues is that they are in no way interested in the "free market", unless that means free of risk for them, and free to profit from state intervention and investment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. Some Keynesians Or Neo-Keynesians Have Won
Paul Samuelson and Joseph Stiglitz...

I suspect , on most college campuses, economics professor agree about a lot more than they disagree upon...

Economics like all the social sciences is concerned with observing human behavior and human behavior is fairly predictable...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC