Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RHODE ISLAND DESALINATION PLANT POLLUTING LOBSTER NURSERY

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 05:55 PM
Original message
RHODE ISLAND DESALINATION PLANT POLLUTING LOBSTER NURSERY
Yachts or rare lobsters? seems like a no brainer to me but then obviously I'm no eggspert.
--###--

original-peer

or Immediate Release: October 15, 2007
Contact: Carol Goldberg (202) 265-7337

RHODE ISLAND DESALINATION PLANT POLLUTING LOBSTER NURSERY — Concentrated Brine Outfall for Yacht Club Illegally Placed in Shallow Waters

Boston — A desalination plant for a new Rhode Island yacht club is seriously jeopardizing an adjacent lobster nursery habitat, according to an investigation conducted by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). The problem is that the submerged outfall was installed in water much too shallow to prevent toxic buildups of brine, in direct violation of its state permit requirements.

The Sakonnet Point Club in Little Compton recently completed a near-shore brackish well water desalination plant to service their marina and yachting facility. The brine effluent from desalination contains high levels of arsenic, copper, and nickel from the rock strata of the wells in addition to concentrated sea salts. In order to protect against over-concentration of the toxic brine, the state permit requires placement of the outflow (called a diffuser) in at least 23 feet of water. After being notified by a public employee, PEER hired a scuba diver who found the diffuser submerged in only eight feet of seawater at near high tide.

The discharge point is located at what is considered a rare and important lobster nursery and grow-out habitat for a struggling industry already staggered by a lobster population crash and operating under severe harvest restrictions. The permit allows discharge of up to 3,000 gallons per day, which contains enough copper, for example, to exceed three times the lethal dose for an adult lobster and six times the lethal level for lobster larvae (over a 96 hour exposure).

“The coastal shallows of Narragansett Bay are the last place we can afford to see this type of pollution,” stated New England PEER Director Kyla Bennett, a biologist and lawyer who formerly worked for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

PEER is demanding that the state Department of Environmental Management (DEM) immediately close the plant, revoke its permit and not re-issue it until the outfall is re-installed properly. DEM had verbally informed Dr. Bennett that it had told the Club not to operate the desalination unit, but this directive was never put in writing. In addition, conflicting information from DEM and the Rhode Island Department of Health, together with eyewitness observations, indicates the system may have actually been piloted throughout the month of August, precisely at the time of wind and current delivery of larval lobsters to the area.

The DEM permit specifies that the “submerged outfall with a multi-port diffuser, consisting of eight (8) ¾ inch diffuser ports, …terminates in 23 feet of water…” . The diffuser pipe is supposed to promote rapid dilution of the toxic effluent with receiving waters. The deeper the water, the quicker is the mixing.

“This is a crystal clear violation of the permit for which we have provided DEM photographic evidence and a sworn affidavit,” Bennett added. “So, we are mystified as to what DEM needs to motivate it to act.”

If DEM continues to stall, PEER is preparing a formal petition that will trigger intervention by EPA, including possible criminal prosecution if it is found that the violation is deliberate.

###












complete release including links to related sources
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. unfortunately the EPA works for the other side now. They'll eat the poor lobsters for dinner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why do I get the funny feeling involving the EPA won't help???
If I were in charge, I'd just shoot first and ask questions later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Brackish well water?
That does not make all that much sense to me since you would have a lot of extra stuff in your drinking water. It seems to me brackish well water would also have a lot of abrasives that would prematurely wear pumps, seals and regulating valves. Why not take suction from the Bay itself instead?

It's a reverse osmosis system

Some more info:

http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/director/adminadj/pdfs/02007wra.pdf

Some interesting conflicts of interests. I doubt that the yacht club made a "lobsters or yachts" decision since that would make no sense. I suspect these yacht club people were fleeced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC