Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush used "Presidential Bully Pulpit" to get the Armenian genocide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 11:45 AM
Original message
Bush used "Presidential Bully Pulpit" to get the Armenian genocide
...bill pulled in his news conference today. I say that a nation which committed massive genocide 100 years ago is quite capable of doing the same thing again, especially if that country has never been held accountable even if done under a totally different ruling system. Bush is wrong to block this bill and congress is right to define who we choose as allies in our war on terror.

<snip>
Key Dems Pull Support For Genocide Bill
House Bill To Condemn Armenian Genocide In Jeopardy
ISTANBUL, Turkey, Oct. 16, 2007


Armenian Deaths Ruled Genocide

A house committee has ruled that mass slayings of Armenians in Turkey 92 years ago was in fact an act of ethnic extermination. Chip Reid reports.

Bush Discourages Resolution (0:40)» More Videos

(AP) A House vote to label the century-old deaths of Armenians as genocide was in jeopardy Tuesday after several Democrats withdrew their support and sounded alarms it could cripple U.S. relations with Turkey.

The loss of support is a major setback to Pelosi and other Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill, who have fiercely defended the resolution to Republicans and the Bush administration as a moral imperative in condemning the World War I-era killings of up to 1.5 million Armenians by Ottoman Turks.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., told reporters Tuesday that the plan remained to vote on the measure before Congress adjourns by the end of the year.

But, he added, “there are a number of people who are revisiting their own positions and we'll have to determine where everyone is,” he said.

The most notable Democratic challenge mounted this week came from Rep. John Murtha, an anti-war ally of Pelosi, D-Calif., and chairman of the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee. Murtha fought against a similar measure 20 years ago.

“From my discussions with our military commanders and foreign policy experts, I believe that this resolution could harm our relations with Turkey and therefore our strategic interests in the region,” Murtha, D-Pa., said in an e-mailed statement on Tuesday.

Also this week, at least six Democrats withdrew their sponsorship of the bill and two other Democrats, Reps. Alcee Hastings of Florida and John Tanner of Tennessee, asked Pelosi to forgo the vote.

Hastings, who has voted against combat funding for Iraq, and Tanner, a member of a conservative Democratic coalition known as the Blue Dogs, said they feared backlash from Turkey would cut off U.S. access to a critical air base.

From my discussions with our military commanders and foreign policy experts, I believe that this resolution could harm our relations with Turkey and therefore our strategic interests in the region.

Rep. John Murtha, chairman, House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee“More than half of the cargo flown into Iraq and Afghanistan comes through Incirlik Air Base and this base would be a key component of any plans for redeployment of our troops in the future,” the lawmakers wrote.

Rep. Ike Skelton, D-Mo., chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, and Rep. Solomon Ortiz, D-Tex., sent Pelosi a similar letter last week.

In response to last week's approval of the resolution by the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Turkey recalled its ambassador in Washington back to Ankara for consultations and asked the Bush administration to stop the resolution from passing in a final floor vote.

Turkey denies the deaths constituted genocide, saying that the toll has been inflated and that those killed were victims of civil war and unrest.

At the Pentagon, Lt. Gen. Carter Ham, operations chief for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was asked whether the U.S. military was considering providing assistance to Turkey in the event that it went after the rebel Kurdistan Workers' Party, or PKK, in northern Iraq.

“It would be inappropriate for me from this standpoint to say we are ruling out or ruling in specific military options,” Ham said, adding that Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, and other commanders are watching the situation closely.

“I don't know specifically what they are planning to do if this matter continues to evolve,” Ham said.

He also said that because there is only one principal overland route from Turkey into northern Iraq for transporting military supplies, a Turkish land offensive southward would have “a significant effect” on the U.S. military's ability to resupply its forces in northern Iraq.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/16/national/main3375896.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Call me goofy but I think this is a waste of time and takes the focus....
off Bushco's attack on the Constitution. Worry more about warrantless wiretapping and less about something that happened 100 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Allow Turks to invade Northern Iraq and commit genocide against
...Iraqi Kurds then? Because that is exactly what Bush and Cheney and Rice want. Expanded war in the region and more chaos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC