Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newspaper staff jailed protecting web-readers' identities re: corrupt sheriff story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 10:43 AM
Original message
Newspaper staff jailed protecting web-readers' identities re: corrupt sheriff story
Edited on Fri Oct-19-07 10:50 AM by nashville_brook
Anyone interested in the freedom/fascism push-me-pull-you going on, might be interested in this latest affront to Constitutional liberty: a corrupt sheriff has teamed up with a butt-monkey prosecutor in an attempt to chill THE READING OF THE NEWS. Usually the chill is placed squarely on the production of journalism (rather than the CONSUMPTION). Now, we have the thought police coming after our IP addresses in the hopes of chilling our reading habits (you out there Prof Plum?). According to the article, the subpoena is an "attempt to research the identity, purchasing habits, and browsing proclivities of our online readership."

At issue is a story run by the Pheonix New Times (an alt-weekly paper...you know, the kind that actually still does "journalism"), that outed the sheriff's hidden commercial real estate investments, and providing an address for the public figure at the bottom of the article as it appeared in the online edition.



From the story:

In a breathtaking abuse of the United States Constitution, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas, and their increasingly unhinged cat's paw, special prosecutor Dennis Wilenchik, used the grand jury to subpoena "all documents related to articles and other content published by Phoenix New Times newspaper in print and on the Phoenix New Times website, regarding Sheriff Joe Arpaio from January 1, 2004 to the present." Every note, tape, and record from every story written about Sheriff Arpaio by every reporter over a period of years. (snip)

More alarming still, Arpaio, Thomas, and Wilenchik subpoenaed detailed information on anyone who has looked at the New Times Web site since 2004. Every individual who looked at any story, review, listing, classified, or retail ad over a period of years.


http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2007-10-18/news/breathtaking-abuse-of-the-constitution/



here's the wording as it appears in the subpoena:




The subpoena demands: "Any and all documents containing a compilation of aggregate information about the Phoenix New Times Web site created or prepared from January 1, 2004 to the present, including but not limited to :

A) which pages visitors access or visit on the Phoenix New Times website;

B) the total number of visitors to the Phoenix New Times website;

C) information obtained from 'cookies,' including, but not limited to, authentication, tracking, and maintaining specific information about users (site preferences, contents of electronic shopping carts, etc.);

D) the Internet Protocol address of anyone that accesses the Phoenix New Times website from January 1, 2004 to the present;

E) the domain name of anyone that has accessed the Phoenix New Times website from January 1, 2004 to the present;

F) the website a user visited prior to coming to the Phoenix New Times website;

G) the date and time of a visit by a user to the Phoenix New Times website;

H) the type of browser used by each visitor (Internet Explorer, Mozilla, Netscape Navigator, Firefox, etc.) to the Phoenix New Times website; and






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. kicking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't the usual accusation in such cases that this is "a fishing expedition"?
i.e. give us absolutely all the information you have, relevant or not, and leave it to us to find something wrong...

The judge should know better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. a fishing expedition by any other name... i think it's retribution. the paper targeted
the sheriff's pocketbook (real estate investments), so he hit back by targeting their pocketbook (their readership).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. Joe Arpaio is a special kind of asshole.
I hope the fucker eventually ends up dying of heat stroke in his own tent jail. There's always vacancies for fuckers like that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. just for kicks, tell us a little about him if you have a sec...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Start with Wikipedia
Wikipedia: Joe Arpaio


Arpaio has been called "America's Toughest Sheriff" for his controversial approach to operating the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, mainly in regards to his treatment of inmates. He has a large number of vocal supporters for his toughness on crime and criminals. Many civil libertarians denounce him for what they believe to be a willingness to ignore constitutional rights in favor of blind enforcement. Arpaio has stated that his goal is to have the most populated jail in the country.

...

Arpaio believes that inmates should be treated as harshly as legally possible to emphasize the punishment aspect of their incarceration. Thus, upon his initial election Arpaio began instituting the controversial changes for which he would later become noted.

Arpaio began to serve inmates surplus food (mainly outdated and oxidized green bologna)<1> and limited meals to twice daily. Meal costs would be reduced to 90 cents per day; as of 2007 Arpaio states that he has managed to reduce costs to 30 cents per day. Certain food items were banned from the county jail, mainly coffee (which also reduced 'coffee attacks' on guards), but later salt and pepper were removed from the jail (at a purported taxpayer savings of $20,000/year).

...

Shortly after taking office, Arpaio reinstituted chain gangs, the controversial form of inmate labor which had been virtually eliminated in the United States.


I'm pushing the paragraph limit for excerpting. This guy has bragged that he spends more money on the animal shelters and treats and feeds the animals better than the inmates. His jail is a big tent city in the Arizona desert, where inmates routinely die of heat stroke in the 110+ degree heat. Oh, he also humiliates inmates by forcing them to wear pink underwear.

He's probably the biggest douchebag of a sheriff in the United States. And I'm from Colorado, not Arizona, so I'm getting this from a distance, that should say something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. holy crap! it didn't occur to me to Wiki him!
thank you for this!

btw -- is there a copyright restriction on Wikipedia?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArbustoBuster Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Wikipedia basically has few copyright restrictions.
Edited on Fri Oct-19-07 01:40 PM by ArbustoBuster
Wikipedia's articles are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Their policy, from their website, is: "The license Wikipedia uses grants free access to our content in the same sense as free software is licensed freely. This principle is known as copyleft. That is to say, Wikipedia content can be copied, modified, and redistributed so long as the new version grants the same freedoms to others and acknowledges the authors of the Wikipedia article used (a direct link back to the article satisfies our author credit requirement). Wikipedia articles therefore will remain free forever and can be used by anybody subject to certain restrictions, most of which serve to ensure that freedom."

Their information on how their articles can be used is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights#Reusers.27_rights_and_obligations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds like Joe is a bit worried about something or someone,
and has to find out who knows what about him. Or in other words-he is paranoid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is the same sheriff Jeff Faris on Nova M has talked about....
a real scumbag it seems. I am sure I have visited the Phoenix New Times website within the year, I guess I will be on the list as well.

Geez, it seems like so long ago when the courts addressed the law and not the political wishes of corrupt politicians. Like so much else, this too is the "new" reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. Please, Lord, let that fucking pig Arpaio go down hard!
The worst pig in America, and that's saying a lot.

Sorry, Mr. Timoney, you only get second place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. This is the same guy who webcams his prisoners, feeds them nothing but baloney, and painted
the inside of his jail pink, and sent the overflow into tents in the desert.

Now he wants to warrantless surveillance records of an on-line newspaper and its readers. Who does he think he is, Gen. Michael Hayden?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. He feeds them spoiled green bologna.
The prick should serve time in his own jail for being a public health menace. See how he feels to eat green bologna, wear pink underwear and sweat in tents in 110 degree heat. Then when it looks like he's about to collapse, throw him in one of his chain gangs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. terrifying, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well the only way Arpaio can get away wiht this
is that this is yet another new normal

He has been testing boundaries for literally YEARS

But yes, this is another marker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. the new authoritarianism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Reminds me of the days of the KKK
these were the same techniques they used to intimidate citizens and take control of entire towns back during their heyday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. what did the jury do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. k/r
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tesla78 Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
20. Simple Solution:
Don't keep logs of ip addresses. They can't request records that do not exist. Many ISPs work this way when it comes to sensitive user browsing information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvccd1000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
21. ALL CHARGES DROPPED! (See link below)
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1020newtimes1020.html

<snip>

A criminal case against Phoenix New Times fell apart Friday amid a crush of public outrage and admissions that a special county prosecutor made serious mistakes.

<snip>

Thomas' announcement came just hours after the State Bar Association confirmed that it had received multiple complaints and had launched an internal investigation into Thomas and special prosecutor Dennis Wilenchik for their actions in the New Times case and an unrelated one.

<snip>

"There have been serious missteps in this matter," he said. "I am announcing that Mr. Wilenchik will no longer serve as special prosecutor."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Thank you for posting the update
and welcome to DU!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
22. Sheriff Joe Arpaio is a pathological liar: made up war stories, claims of arresting Elvis...
Ready to know the truth about "Sheriff Joe"?



Sheriff Joe Arpaio: He arrested Elvis Presley.

Truth: Actually, Sheriff Joe Arpaio sometimes claims to have arrested Elvis and other times he claims to have stopped him for a traffic violation. No police records nor Presley family records have ever surfaced to show any contact between Elvis and Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

:shrug:



Sheriff Joe Arpaio: He was a Korean War veteran.

Truth: This one is tricky. He was in the Army during the Korean War but he never set foot there. His overseas assignment was in France.

:eyes:


Sheriff Joe Arpaio: He is the "Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the County" and has authority over all police departments and the DPS.

Truth: Another meaningless title. He has no authority over other police agencies.

:dunce:



Sheriff Joe Arpaio: He broke the famous "French Connection."

Truth: The people really involved in this case never heard of Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

:argh:



Plenty more where those came from...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. He sounds like he hangs out with Guiliani
though, I'm sure the competition for the lying, egotistical asshole award would be fierce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
26. Didn't Arpaio hire a con man as a deputy who ended up
fondling a female prisoner? I saw it on one of the TV magazine shows like Dateline, but forget the specifics.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvccd1000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Not sure you can lay that one on him...
... much as I don't like the guy, I believe he does run the largest sheriff's office in the nation. I don't think anyone could keep ALL the bad apples out of the barrel when you have that many employees (~4,000, I believe).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. No, he personally deputized him. Found a CBS link:
It was a CBS 48 Hour episode on a con man named David Pecard. I should've looked it up when I first posted instead of just running with an old memory of a TV show. From this program, I remembered Arpaio more than the con because of what was said and shown about the sheriff and how he runs his department.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1999/11/10/48hours/printable55788.shtml

- snip -

"He has to probably be one of the biggest conmen in the United States of America," says Arizona's Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who in 1996 was conned into deputizing Pecard. "How could he pose as military police; agent, U.S. marshall, FBI, you name it? And he got by with it!"

"Doors can be opened if you know how to open them," Pecard says. "I am a chameleon. I adapt. It's what I've been my whole life."

As a high-profile sheriff known for being tough on crime, Arpaio doesn't seem like a likely mark. But in 1996 Arpaio met Pecard, then an Army sergeant, doing military investigations in the Phoenix area. Pecard came to Arpaio's office with a lieutenant colonel.

He told Arpaio that he could help the sheriff with getting military equipment. "I just believed him, and I'm always looking for free equipment," Arpaio says. The sheriff personally deputized Pecard, and told his executive officer, Tom Bearup, to set him up with an office and whatever he needed.

"To my knowledge we never did a background investigation or anything," Bearup says. "Joe walked him through."

Pecard basically worked without supervision, Arpaio admits.

- snip -

Pecard's odyssey came to a crashing halt in November 1996, when Pecard allegedly checked two female inmates out of the county jail and sexually abused them. Three days after being accused, he was arrested.

Much more at link ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvccd1000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. OK, I guess you CAN lay that one on him. :)
I remember that case now that you bring it up. Sounds like Sheriff Joe wasn't the only one that guy scammed (although he certainly should have known better)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC