Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bob Herbert: Until the War Ends ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 12:40 PM
Original message
Bob Herbert: Until the War Ends ...
Edited on Wed Feb-14-07 12:44 PM by ProSense
Sunday, February 11, 2007

Bob Herbert: Until the War Ends ...

Snip...

The war — which, in addition to its human toll, will ultimately cost $2 trillion or more — has put America in a straitjacket, precluding progress on a range of important issues that will only worsen with continued neglect.

Snip...

We’ve moved beyond the absurd when it comes to the war. President Bush responded to the antiwar sentiment in last November’s election by escalating U.S. involvement in Iraq. Vice President Dick Cheney, lost in a zone of unreality, is blithely spreading the fantasy of “enormous progress.” He may not have noticed that the last three months have been among the worst of the war.

The Democrats who benefited from the antiwar vote reacted to the president’s thumb in the eye of the voters with their usual timidity. They’ve put their hearts and souls into a marathon effort to pass a nonbinding resolution opposing the troop surge. Be still my heart.

The bottom line is that nothing has changed. The horror stories continue to spew out of Iraq: the helicopters being shot down, the mass killings in marketplaces, the steady stream of U.S. soldiers returning in body bags.

We need to stop pretending that there is something sane about continued U.S. involvement in this ruinous war. We keep sending troops into the combat zone and they keep sinking ever deeper into the ancient Middle East sand. To keep sending young people off to die in a war that everybody knows is pointless is criminal.

more...


Bush's $2.77 trillion budget included a Record $622 Billion Budget Requested for the Pentagon. (Billions could be saved by withdrawing troops from Iraq.)

Money for war and everything else gets cut, cut, cut:

The Bush Budget Fails Gulf Coast Hurricane Survivors

Just days after opposing the Baker-Landrieu bill (H.R. 4100), a bipartisan plan to redevelop the Gulf Coast region’s flooded areas, President Bush presented a budget proposal for Fiscal Year 2007 that deals another painful blow to hurricane survivors. The Bush budget shows his Administration has learned little from the Gulf Coast hurricanes that displaced over 1 million Americans, caused 1,350 deaths, destroyed 275,000 homes, and caused $40 billion in property damage. Instead of addressing the ongoing economic development, recovery, rebuilding, housing, health care, and education needs of Gulf Coast communities, President Bush proposes cuts to the very programs that would help the hurricane survivors. For example, President Bush proposes slashing funding for Community Development Block Grants (CDBG)—the program his Administration pointed to as a reason for opposing the Baker-Landrieu bill. As recently as last week, Donald E. Powell, the administration’s federal coordinator for Gulf Coast rebuilding said:

Snip...

If the Bush Administration believes that CDBG money is the best way to rebuild the Gulf Coast, then why does the Bush budget for Fiscal Year 2007 cut funding for CDBG grants by $736 million? To make matters worse, the President’s budget takes away funding from state and local authorities and relies on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to administer federal funds for hurricane relief. This report examines the various ways President Bush’s budget fails hurricane survivors.

Bush Budget Shortchanges Disaster Prevention Programs

Bush budget cuts funding for the Army Corps of Engineers. The Army Corps of Engineers is responsible for carrying out projects that help prevent flooding and coastal damage, including levee projects. Yet the Bush budget would cut funding for the Army Corps of Engineers by 11 percent or $596 million, from $5.3 billion to $4.7 billion in Fiscal Year 2007. This includes a 34 percent cut in the construction budget. The President’s budget would cut funding by $2 million for emergency streambank and shoreline protection and by $40 million for aquatic plant control and ecosystems. Funding proposals for 596 projects in last year’s Energy and Water Appropriations bill were not included in the President’s budget request.

Bush budget cuts funding for storm warning and detection programs. Early warnings of natural disasters can help prepare the public and give government officials more time to plan for and implement emergency plans. The Bush budget, however, would cut millions in funding for the very government agencies and programs that help provide these services. The National Weather Service (NWS) provides warnings and forecasts to ensure public safety and mitigate property loss and economic disruption. The Bush budget would cut funding for the NWS from $107 million to $98 million in Fiscal Year 2007. Funding for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration would be reduced by $169 million, from $3.850 billion to $3.681 billion in Fiscal Year 2007, including the National Ocean Service ($113 million cut); the Oceanic and Atmospheric Research program ($18 million cut); and the National Marine Fisheries Service ($37 million cut).

more...


NPR took An Inside Look: President Bush's 2007 Budget, and found cuts:

Budget Proposals Trim Health Care Spending
Education Spending Declines
Spending on Environment Cut

And there are more cuts:

Veterans face consecutive budget cuts

Bush’s ‘08 Budget Slashes Middle-Class Assistance


Where are all the prominent figures of the Democratic Party?

They need to make some, or some more, noise about ending the war because until the war ends, people will continue to die and essential programs that benefit the living will continue to suffer budget cuts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let see.....
I guess this will become the norm:







IMPEACH NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. The problem is quite simple
America no longer has the ability to think clearly.
So, spend more billions, send more troops, ignore more news, take another drink,
think about Anna Nicole.
Seriously, this is now the most stupid fucking country on earth.
"Goddamn Communists under the bed are tryin' to give me health care. Where's my rifle?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Sad but true.
But I have to laugh at my mental picture of the Commy hunter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. The legacy of death, mutilation, destruction and fiscal recklessness is staggering,
mind-boggling, and ruinous, but W must be given everything he wants and surely must not be thwarted in any manner as if this were a constitutional republic where a measure of accountability and checks and balances is built in. Long live the King. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dwahzon Donating Member (338 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mloutre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. ditto. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Republicans up for reelection in 2008
21:

Alexander, Lamar (R-TN)
Allard, Wayne (R-CO)
Chambliss, Saxby (R-GA)
Cochran, Thad (R-MS)
Coleman, Norm (R-MN)
Collins, Susan M. (R-ME)
Cornyn, John (R-TX)
Craig, Larry E. (R-ID)
Dole, Elizabeth (R-NC)
Domenici, Pete V. (R-NM)
Enzi, Michael B. (R-WY)
Graham, Lindsey (R-SC)
Hagel, Chuck (R-NE)
Inhofe, James M. (R-OK)
McConnell, Mitch (R-KY)
Roberts, Pat (R-KS)
Sessions, Jeff (R-AL)
Smith, Gordon H. (R-OR)
Stevens, Ted (R-AK)
Sununu, John E. (R-NH)
Warner, John (R-VA)

Make then accountable for Iraq, contact them about ending the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Edwards: Congress should cap funding; if elected would pull out a third of combat troops
A third? Huh?

WASHINGTON (AP) — Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards said Wednesday that he would immediately pull about a third of U.S. combat troops out of Iraq if he were president.

Congress should also cut military funding to force President Bush to do so, Edwards said.

Edwards is going a step farther than rivals Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record), who want to cap the number of troops in Iraq to prevent Bush's increase, but are reluctant to cut funding while soldiers are on the ground.

"At this point, the escalation is under way, so blocking it is not enough," Edwards told reporters in a conference call. "So what I'm doing today is calling on Congress to take the next step, which is to cap funding."

Edwards spoke as the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives debated a measure opposing Bush's decision to send 21,500 troops to Iraq to help the 130,000 that were already there at the beginning of the year. Edwards said the non-binding resolution being debated is not enough.

link


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaukraut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. k&r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. K & R
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dwahzon Donating Member (338 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Martin Eden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. "a war that everybody knows is pointless"
I wish EVERYONE knew that because if they did we'd be outta there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Herbert left out this part
"a war that everybody (except war profiteers) knows is pointless"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC