Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld’s revenge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 10:17 AM
Original message
Rumsfeld’s revenge
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/20/rumsfelds-revenge/

Rumsfeld’s revenge.

A story in tomorrow’s Washington Post reports that early in 2004, then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld became angry that the Pentagon was losing control over reconstruction efforts in Iraq. In return, he refused to provide military security for diplomats, forcing the State Department to rush to Blackwater:

The next year, as the United States prepared to return sovereignty to the Iraqis and the State Department began planning an embassy in Baghdad, Rumsfeld lost a bid to retain control over the full U.S. effort, including billions of dollars in reconstruction funds. A new executive order, signed in January 2004, gave State authority over all but military operations. Rumsfeld’s revenge, at least in the view of many State officials, was to withdraw all but minimal assistance for diplomatic security.

“It was the view of Donald Rumsfeld and {then-Deputy Defense Secretary} Paul Wolfowitz that this wasn’t their problem,” said a former senior State Department official. Meetings to negotiate an official memorandum of understanding between State and Defense during the spring of 2004 broke up in shouting matches over issues such as their respective levels of patriotism and whether the military would provide mortuary services for slain diplomats. {…}

State chose the most expedient solution: Take over the Pentagon’s personal security contract with Blackwater and extend it for a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Rumsfeld
May he be scalded in Hell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minerva50 Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. He took his revenge on civil servants too!
He got a new personnel system inserted into the defense authorization bill in the conference committee a couple of years ago. It's called National Security Personnel system (NSPS), but has nothing to do with security. It has everything to do with dis-empowering unions, demoralizing the workforce, enabling cronyism and cutting wages. I'm just glad I'm within 3 years of retiring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loves_dulcinea Donating Member (384 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. rofl
i'm more patriotic than you!
nuh-uh, i'm the real patriot.

fucking stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. You know, if this doesn't spell coup and civil war, I don't know what does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Protecting the homeland?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. So we can thank Rumsfeld's hissy-fit for the ascendancy of Blackwater..
He should be in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC