|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 08:53 PM Original message |
All the redactions in Valerie Plame's book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. Why not? Because the black pages themselves are very educational. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Olney Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'm glad it's there. It's a documentation of how covert she was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 08:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Excellent point. You are right about that. The redacted portions just peaked my curiousity even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 02:59 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. That's "piqued." /grammar nazi (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. that's our democracy in black & white....speaks volumes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasProgresive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
4. Sounds, like Ms. Plame wants the readers to know how much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
6. Well the CIA can redact all they want but the truth is in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rusty quoin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
7. I thought she would rewrite it in a way to make it coherent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
8. Are you truly a journalist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
9. I think the OBVIOUSNESS of the redactions is a very effective message. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libnnc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
11. Because it serves as a visual reminder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC