Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DC Madam Invesitigation Leads to Monica Goodling, Attorney Firings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 07:07 AM
Original message
DC Madam Invesitigation Leads to Monica Goodling, Attorney Firings
http://alternet.org/blogs/peek/65882/#more

DC Madam Invesitigation Leads to Monica Goodling, Attorney Firings

This post, written by Pheonix Woman, originally appeared onFireDogLake

Poor David Vitter. The job security of Deborah Jeane Palfrey's most prominent client just got a bit shakier.

See, the main (if not only) reason his fellow Republicans aren't currently trying to boot him like they are Larry "Wide Stance" Craig is because a Democrat is -- for the next couple of months -- governor of Louisiana. But when Piyush "Bobby" Jindal is sworn in as governor of the Pelican State, Louisiana will join Larry Craig's state of Idaho in having a Republican governor, one that will appoint a Republican to replace Vitter should he be forced to leave his seat for any reason.

And his reasons for doing so just got a bit hotter, with the heating up of the long-simmering "DC Madam" case:

CLG exclusive: Citizens for Legitimate Government (CLG) has learned that a US Judge will hear a selective prosecution argument made by the so-called DC Madam, Deborah Jeane Palfrey, on Monday. Palfrey told CLG that Monica Goodling "likely will be subpoenaed in this matter - along with many others at Justice - in the near future."

Oh, my. And get this:

According to Mr. Sibley, to support this contention, Ms. Palfrey "will be offering a composite exhibit of statements, news articles and a memo from Monica Goodling which collectively detail the politicization of the Department of Justice in a manner which lends credence to Jeane's argument of selective prosecution. At the conclusion of the argument, Jeane will be asking the Court to issue subpoenas and conduct an evidentiary hearing into these allegations."

Double oh my.

This ought to be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder if Monica Goodling ask for immunity...again? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Citizens for Legitimate Government is not a credible source.
They're not as bad as Prison Planet, but they're not especially known for tempering their enthusiasm with journalistic rigor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I didn't know that. Maybe they're just outraged at this illegitimate government!
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Their heart is in the right place. They just don't always get their facts straight. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Oh so they're not banned from DU yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. The madam keeps shaking the tree hoping that something will fall out
Edited on Tue Oct-23-07 07:53 AM by Mike Daniels
Desparate acts by a woman who has practically nothing to show for all her claims that her list carries high profile clients.

Given the number of people scouring her phone records if there was truly something to see it would have appeared by now.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. This matter has been languishing in the wings. So many crooks, so little Justice
We were discussing this on DU during the Senate Hearings. This brings together the S&L scandal, Iran-Contra, Abramoff, and more.

A lot of the context:
DEAL OR NO DEAL? Abramoff's and Rove's ex-aide has "useful information" about Abramoff, White House
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x995236#1001068
Response to Reply #21
22. Monica Goodling's Lawyer at Akin Gump, also Boss of DC Madam Escort?
May-30-07 by L. Coyote

Law Blog Question of the Day: Who pays Goodling’s legal bills? Akin Gump’s Dowd is one of D.C. top white-collar defense lawyers whose rate, we’d venture to guess, is too rich for young Monica’s blood. Assuming he has some flexibility, does he cut his fees? Does he take the case pro bono for the opportunity to work on a fascinating case with lots of free publicity? Through an Akin Gump spokeswoman, Dowd declined to comment. Beltway lawyers: How does this work?
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/category/dismissed-us-attorneys

============================
OMG: The Akin Gump Escort Worked For... Monica Goodling's Lawyer!!!
Is this source reliable?
http://www.abovethelaw.com/2007/05/akin_gump_on_the_dc_madams_app.php#more
We have confirmed, with knowledgeable sources, what was previously rumored in reader comments. The Akin Gump Escort worked for John M. Dowd, the high-powered head of the firm's criminal litigation group.

...............We emailed Mr. Dowd to confirm that the (alleged) Akin Gump Assistant Madam worked as his secretary. We didn't receive a response from him. But a few hours later, we were contacted by a firm spokesperson:

Per your query, I write to advise that this is an internal personnel matter, and as such we will not provide comment.

============
For the Googling researchers, spin-off thread here:
Monica Goodling's Lawyer at Akin Gump, also Boss of DC Madam Escort?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1001082

Research revealed that John McCain was a former client during the S&L scandal, and that the law firm is a lobbyist firm too, raking in millions from the impoverished Gila River Indians in Arizona. This is just unbelievable, $$millions$$ per year! This is also very reminiscent of Abramoff, which McCain so kindly covered up before 2004 to save Bush's election! Gila River also gives huge amounts to McCain.

Akin, Gump et al
2003 - Total Lobbying Income: $25,790,000
2003 - Gila River Indian Community $2,040,000
================
2004 = $27,960,000
Gila River Indian Community $2,180,000

2005 = $28,460,000
Gila River Indian Community $1,260,000

http://www.opensecrets.org/lobbyists/firmsum.asp?txtnam...

Mr. Dowd has represented a U.S. senator before the Department of Justice and the Senate Ethics Committee; a U.S. Army colonel in the Iran Contra Hearings; a U.S. senator before the Senate Ethics Committee; and a U.S. governor in litigation with the Resolution Trust Corporation and in a fact-finding hearing before the House Subcommittee on General Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs, which inquired into the failure of the savings and loan industry. .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Hide your diapers, dudes" - republcion national committee
Edited on Tue Oct-23-07 08:18 AM by SpiralHawk
"Diaper sex with hookers is, um, perfectly, um, normal (for republicons)"

- Republicon Senator David Vitter (Louisiana)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC