Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maybe we should bring back duelling.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 12:56 PM
Original message
Maybe we should bring back duelling.
Edited on Tue Oct-23-07 01:00 PM by backscatter712
That Stark apology was fucking humiliating. I'm sick of this capitulations, these dishonors, this bullying. So I asked what the Founding Fathers would have done.

They would have shot each other.

If 18th Century Congressman Stark had said that comment about the troops going to war to die for Bush's amusement, 18th Century President Bush would have turned around, slapped Stark with the glove, and said "You have insultified my honor and I demand dissatisfaction." Later, they'd meet at the field of honor, take their duelling pistols, walk ten paces, turn and fire.

Am I the only one who doesn't think of that as entirely bad?

There's a certain romance to demanding death before dishonor.

The funny thing is that at duels, half the time, killing each other wasn't really the point. Defending one's honor was the point. Some (but not all) of the time, duelists would fire shots in the air, or aim just to wound, or deliberately miss. The point was to show that you were courageous and honorable enough to look down the barrel of your opponent's gun and take a bullet rather than show cowardice.

Or maybe I'm just sick of seeing those who "represent" me cower in humiliation. Stark should not have apologized, even if he got censured, lost all his committee seats, his chairmanships, and none of his bills, earmarks or other legislation saw the light of day again. At least he'd still have his dignity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Zell? Is that you?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
momster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fighting with Walking Sticks
on the floor of the Senate was a popular way to settle disagreements among 'gentlemen' as well. Now they could put it on Pay-Per-View.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If we want to keep it relatively non-lethal, I recommend Mensur
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensur

It's a German form of fencing/duelling with sharp blades. Protective clothing is worn including goggles, throat and arm padding, chain mail shirt and gauntlets so you don't get run through, but lots of areas such as the cheeks are left unprotected.

When fencing in this style, dodging or flinching is not allowed - you have to stand your ground. And yes, you'll get slashed if you participate in this sport. The resulting scar on the side of your face is a badge of honor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
momster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. A Sip from the Soup-Plate of Honor
so called because the hand guards on the swords were so enormous. An interesting relic but Americans wouldn't vote for a president with large scars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The caning of John Sumner 1856..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdlh8894 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dissatifaction?? Insultified?? Honor?????? ???? EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Isn't that how 18th Century Bush would talk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC