|
If they are using a set height-weight chart, they need to account for frame and bone structure.
The age 5 child of Tom Cruise (hahahahahaha...never mind...couldn't help it) and Calista Flockhart is going to be smaller and finer boned than say, the same age child of Refrigerator Perry and Roseanne Barr. There's genetics, there's heredity, there's height and frame. And there are TONS, excuse the pun, of ways to measure "obesity"--and weight isn't the best measure always. There's calipers, tape measure, the water tank for displacement--it's a fat to muscle ratio that needs to be considered, too.
And there's also that research that shows that obesity may be caused by a virus. If that turns out to be true, well, in any country other than the UK, which kind of says "Fuck it, whinger, we MEANT well" to anyone who complains when the government screws up, it would be lawsuit time--imagine excoriating a family, making them feel bad, making the kid feel like a fat shit, for something that turned out to be caused by a virus???
All 'food for thought,' anyway...
I think EVERY kid should get a letter with weight listed, and perhaps some nutritional guidance that might or might not be based on having the kid answer some nutritional questions over time (what did you have for dinner last night? Breakfast? What did you eat yesterday? At the weekend? etc...to get an idea of what even the skinny kids are eating--no veg or fruit, that's a problem).
To single out just the fat kids is dumb. The fat kid who eats a low-meat diet is probably gonna be better off, heart and healthwise, even with extra weight, than Little Harry Hereditarily Skinny, who eats fatty sausages, greasy chips and crisps all day but doesn't gain an ounce.
|