Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Keep in mind that Bill Clinton helped to resurrect a legacy for George HW Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:27 AM
Original message
Keep in mind that Bill Clinton helped to resurrect a legacy for George HW Bush
by endorsing him in his efforts in the Tsunami, etc.
It makes me wonder if the back room deal was struck that if Hillary gets the nod, if she will help out Junior's legacy?
I'm sorry. These two families are almost incestuous.
Gives me the creeps and I absolutely adored Bill Clinton at one time.:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. I LOVE a good conspiracy theory. If the Clintons are that smart/organized, they should be in the WH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Just another rephrasing of the Bush Clinton Bush Clinton meme.
I admire the artfulness of putting a new look on that tired smear. Bringing the tsunami into it!

We should start a point grading system for this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. as we should for those who do everything to enable
the corporatist rot to take over our party.
Sorry, you are still at a C-.
Try harder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
23. It's not a "meme"
It's a pattern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
69. You mean that corrrupt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Beyond belief.
Clinton went as an emissary of the United States. Do you think he would have been sent WITHOUT George Daddy?

So you are going to keep your body and your politics holy and pure and untainted? You will never do business with anyone who has ever done a bad thing?

Are you kidding me? Are you 12?

DID THEY GET THE JOB DONE? But you think it should have been politicized (you know, what Bush does) and no one who disagrees with you should have been allowed to help anyone after the tsunami? And that makes you different from Bush in what way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I have put out my eyes so that I don't run the risk of even looking at a Conservative
Why haven't you? Are you some kind of Bush lover?

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I certainly don't sleep with my enemies
What was wrong with Clinton calling on Carter to help? Clinton has always had the world by the tail. The world community loves him. Poppy not so much.
Why Bush?
These people supposedly made his life living hell.
Why enable them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Bush is President. HE appointed Clinton and his father to represent the U.S.
Get it? Clinton couldn't appoint himself and then "call on" Carter. He's not President anymore.

And politicians have always "slept" with their political enemies. Ted Kennedy is good friends with Orrin Hatch, for example. Until very recently, most politicians were able to keep their personal and political views separate. I think this is one of the problems with the current political culture, starting with Newt Gingritch and his ilk -- it's not a good thing that we are so rarely able today to put aside differences and work together for the common good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. Clinton has never viewed Republicans as enemies. Listen to him talk sometime.
He's about competing ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. I think this is why some DUers are so suspicious of him. They want him
to treat Rethugs in the same way that creeps such as Gingritch and Delay treat the Dems.

But nothing in Clinton's nature could ever make him behave like those two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Sure. But - I agree - thats just not who he is. There's a reason he was very popular
as President and had a lot of crossover votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. Clinton is one of those rare birds who doesn't let politics..
effect his personal feelings. He doesn't appear to hold grudges at all. It's all just a game to him. You win some, you lose some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #29
42. I'm not sure that "it's all just a game to him." I think it's that he's
learned not to take things personally, which is a good quality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. The political part, not the public service part..
I guess that didn't come out right. I think he's truly dedicated to making a difference in the world, and he always has been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #29
70. That's why...
... he lost it in that TV interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
61. Clinton's nature. I'm happy for you that you got that pegged.
I'm still wondering.
There are other 'natural' laws at work here. Mostly against most of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
66. For one, Bush appointed Clinton and his father
Secondly, Republicans don't like Clinton and Carter. By having the two of them lead the initiative they would be alienating a potential donor base that Poppy could tap into.

This wasn't politics, it was Tsunami and Katrina relief and the objective was to raise the most money for the people in need of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bill Clinton wanted to be President. Not Activist-in-Chief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Translate into English?
Edited on Wed Oct-24-07 09:37 AM by aquart
We can start by you trying to explain what you THINK you're saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Bill Clinton is a mainstream Democrat. He wanted to be President. He is not,
and never has been, about waging war against other Americans. He's a consensus builder. So of course he's going to work with other ex Presidents on causes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
30. NAFTA was not "mainstream Democrat". Nor was his welfare "reform".
His economic policies otherwise were proven excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #30
40. nor was the telecom act of 1996.
and as to his economic policies- the tech boom is what made them work so well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
43. You're assuming that "mainstream" equals liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yeah, the whole "yin & yang" thing they have going is creepy.
The Clintons appear to believe that the Bushes are really fine, good Americans who are just wrong on some things and maybe a little inept. Both Clintons are far too intelligence and "in the know" to actually believe this, so one is left with thinking that the two families are in collusion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I get that impression too. I never understood why there would be
any kind of relationship between those two families, and yet the Clintons and the Gores don't pal around together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. The Clintons are behaving like gracious people who expect the best in others,
Edited on Wed Oct-24-07 09:49 AM by pnwmom
not like the nasty Newt Gingritches or Tom Delays, who want to demonize their political enemies. This doesn't mean that they had blinders on, or let themselves be taken advantage of. But, with regard to their common aim for the good, they give their political opponents the benefit of the doubt. Until the onset of Gingritch, this is how the majority of Senators behaved. This is why Senators have always had friends "across the aisle" and why Presidents and ex-Presidents refrained from criticizing former or current Presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. So many people here want Dems to behave as Gingrich, Armey did. Not I. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. Don't forget - a lot of DUers are just waiting for "the revolution" and aren't
interested in working in the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #25
37. "working in the system"?
The system is broken.
How do you work within that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Case in point. Don't expect presidents to lead a revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #17
32. Bush has destroyed this country precisely because he has been
given the "benefit of the doubt". The "doubt" is long past. Anyone in this country who still doubts Bush's motives and his aims is either stupid or lying. Anyone who says that Bush and his administration is trying to do what is best for this country is either stupid or lying. The reason this country is in the shape that it is in is because politicians who should have known better treated this regime as "politics as usual" and gave it the "benefit of the doubt". I have no use for that kind of politics any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #32
44. You're right that Bush's motives are now clear. But Clinton was able to help the
tsunami victims, and so he did. That doesn't mean that his eyes, and HRC's, haven't been opened to the evils and stupidities of the current administration.

But a good poker player doesn't show his hand. I bet Clinton is a good poker player.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #32
71. Exactly...
... I agree with the OP 100% and I expect HRC to be about as good a president as Bush is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. Why did Clinton go? He was trying to help the TSUNAMI VICTIMS, not Bush, Sr.
Maybe you should write a novel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I understand that
and will save the novella for you.
However, WHY allow Poppy to ride on HIS coattails?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. The cause transcended political division.
Edited on Wed Oct-24-07 09:49 AM by TwilightZone
Having former presidents from both sides ensured that it would remain that way.

As far as "coattails", perhaps Mr. Clinton was unconcerned with who should get credit.

Edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. Why allow Poppy? Who said he had a choice? Bush invited him AND Poppy
to fundraise for the tsunami victims. Clinton agreed to go. Period. No big conspiracy necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. Jr's buddies and beliefs are at odds with Pappy's crowd....
That is why the consternation and gnashing of teeth in the back rooms by the NeoCons about Bob Gates. Gates is no prize, but he is a dues paying member of the Globalization of business' crowd.....which leads directly to your subject! Clinton is also a member, so is Jimmy Carter, although his dues may be in arrears at this time.

BIG business depends upon STABILITY, that is how you can then carefully plan and follow through on long range takeovers and mergers, and price settings. Instability blows all planning out the window. It provides openings fro 'newcomers' such as Halliburton et nausum. Notice it has taken almost three hears for the 'usual suspects' GE, Boeing, etc to actually get a proportionate share of the Iraq pie.

Scary, and sickening thought, but it just may be that those global corporatists may be the only ones with sufficient clout and resources to cleanse the NeoCONS and religious zealots bent on achieving their 'god' ordered missions.

Sometime a deal with an evil devil is necessary to defeat the insane devil.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
24. My personal view is that it's more about mutual respect...
Bush pulled out all the stops to take the Clintons down and he couldn't do it. Probably the first people in his whole life he couldn't get to, and I think he gives them their props.

I'm sure Poppy gave Clinton some invaluable assistance and advice over the years as well. I think Poppy also flaunts his friendship with Bill Clinton, obviously someone little boots hates and despises, in front of his son, because he in fact has nothing but contempt for him.

We simply could never know the mechanics behind that complicated relationship, but there has probably been some sort of truce between the two. I will never in a million years buy that Poppy or any other Bush is enabling Hillary Clinton's run for the White House though. Too much time and money is being spent trying to tear her down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Um... what did Bush ever do to take the Clintons down?
I presume you mean during the RW attacks on the Clinton presidency? How was Bush involved?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Poppy Bush...
you don't think he was involved in the right wing smear attack against the Clintons? Look at who his friends are, especially in the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. That's a pretty weak association...
His friends in the media plus the rest of the media played their role. As involved I would characterize people like Scaife, Olin, Gingrich, Hyde... where's even the oblique connection (like GWHB to coke dealing/Iran-Contra)? He may have enjoyed it, but where was he, or any of his usual crew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Don't forget the Moon connection...
Poppy's very good at keeping his fingerprints off things though, all the more reason to suspect he was pulling levers behind the curtain.

One anecdotal note: I knew some people at the time Clinton won office who were appointees in the Poppy administration. Clinton made the fatal mistake of keeping a lot of those people on for a while until he could get his transition completed. That bunch hated him with a passion and were all about revenge and smear. I don't think the Clintons ever dreamed the levels that these people would stoop to in an effort to trash them. That's of course where Linda Tripp came from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
47. Don't you remember? The whole Rethug crowd was beside themselves that
Edited on Wed Oct-24-07 12:15 PM by pnwmom
"trailer trash" like the Clintons had invaded the domain of the "patrician" Bush family. The Bushes very clearly helped orchestrate the attacks that began from practically the minute Clinton took the oath of office.

You really think the Bushes, with all their dynastical pretensions, weren't a huge part of all that, behind the scenes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #47
57. I don't know -
what I can see is Scaife, Olin, Hyde, the entire nomenklatura of pundits including many faux-liberals, the Paula Jones operation - orchestration by Papa Bush and crew is an assumption. I'm not aware of any of his usual cronies being prominent in it.

Bush had his mistress too, remember?

I can also see Clinton & "Papa Doc" Bush very buddy-buddy today, far beyond what tsunami charities might require.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. I think that Clinton pretending to be buddy-buddy with Poppy is
a wonderful way to needle the Shrub -- whose narcissism must be severely wounded each and every time someone calls this to his attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. Sorry if I think that face value is a value
When you never engage in straight talk about a criminal regime, how much does it matter if some minor actions can be questionably interpreted as "needling"? This hour calls for something decidedly more, and the Clintons as usual are playing self-serving games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
26. Now I've said that Clinton is the son Poppy always wanted, but I don't hold the
Tsunami thing against him. It was supposed to be a joint bi-partisan effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
28. I don't understand the coziness. Father/Son wannabe's, whatever. Poppy is still the son
Edited on Wed Oct-24-07 10:02 AM by WinkyDink
of a Nazi, still a contender for JFK murder involvement, still the former head of the CIA, still the Iran-Contra shadow figure, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. Yeah, and still an un-indicted former President too....
hopefully the same won't be said of his son in a few years...:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #28
50. The coziness is in your mind, planted there by the spin of the media.
It's not real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #50
62. No, not real at all....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
35. Bill Clinton and George Sr. were asked as former Presidents to
work to help alleviate the suffering caused by the tsunami. They worked together in a humanitarian, not political, effort as emmisaries of the US and that is exactly as it should have been, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #35
49. ITA!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
39. It's even worse than you can imagine
The Clintons were the one's who planted the nuclear bomb under the ocean and detonated it to cause the tsunami
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. Don't give up your day job
because you really aren't that funny. I'm positive I'm not the only one who has told you that though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
45. IMO there are some things beyond politics
Edited on Wed Oct-24-07 12:11 PM by LeftishBrit
I'm no fan of Daddy Bush, and even Clinton, though I respect him, was a bit too conservative for my socialist tastes; but tsunami relief was SO important that I think one needed to endorse ALL efforts there. If Maggie "Evil One" Thatcher had been raising money for tsunami relief, I'd have endorsed her efforts!

As far as Hillary helping out Dubya in anything similar, I don't think you'd need worry, because there is NO WAY he'd make the effort to do anything constructive, or achieve any success if he did try. Look at his horrific uncaring incompetence with regard to Katrina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
46. OH MY GOD.
THEY HELPED THE TSUNAMI SURVIVORS!

HOW COULD THEY?!??/1/1/1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. It doesn't surprise me in the LEAST that that is what YOU took
out of this.:eyes:
But the hillary apologists are ever faithful and ever diligent to do everything they can to misinform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #53
64. So I'm a Hillary apologist now, eh?
That's fucking rich. I'm certainly no fan of Hillary. I'm also not a fan of bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #46
56. They also appeared together at a couple of Super Bowls
Did tours, expressed friendship, joked for press, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
51. Ah yes...don't vote for Hillary because
Her husband worked with a Bush to get aid to Tsnumi victims, therefore touching a much broader base, so obviously he didn't really care about the victims he was just trying to make the former Bush Prez. look good after he is dead so that the former Bush would help get his wife elected.

It all becomes clear now........

The victims didn't need any help anyway. This helping people shit just has to stop. It is far more important to make BushI continue to look like a ass then it is to help real people.


GEEEEEEEEEEEEZ............. this place has some twisted fucking logic sometimes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. not to bounce you off your soapbox
BUT I NEVER said the tsunami victims didn't need help.
It's that ASSumption thing that "some DU'ers" do so well.:eyes:
Please read what I wrote. It might be a stretch for you to understand, but I will try to help you wrap your head around it.
WHY.DID.BILL.CLINTON.LEND.A.HAND.TO.HELPING.THE.POPULARITY.OF.GHWB?
Bill didn't NEED the help of ANY Bush to raise money for the tsunami victims.
He didn't NEED Jr's help. He didn't NEED Poppy's help.
He could have probably raised just as much as Private Citizen Clinton.
But instead, he helped the legacy of Poppy Bush--which had taken a severe beating.
Now wrap your little head around the truth, will you, and stop making up shit as you go along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. So when Clinton was asked by the Bushes to help out the tsunami victims..
because they needed his worldwide name and popularity to get it done, he should have said FUCK YOU, I'LL DO IT MYSELF?

C'mon, you can't be that petty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
54. I'm no fan of Hillary, yet this isn't a reason that I won't vote for her
I thought that the two former presidents setting aside political differences to help people in need was great. It was actually one of the few things that I think President Bush did that was right.

And in the greater scheme of things, history isn't going to take that event in order to give Bush Sr. a good legacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. New odd couple: Hillary Clinton and Newt Gingrich
New odd couple: Hillary Clinton and Newt Gingrich - International ...
The two former rivals have teamed up on a number of issues, including health care and the New York senator's presidential prospects in 2008.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/05/13/news/clinton.php

The Clintons are the Great Triangulators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-24-07 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
63. I know...UnFuckingReal..
but there ya have..and we're suppose turn the ol' blind eye to the Big DOOOOG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
65. Give me a fucking break...
Clinton and Bush working together on Tsunami and Katrina fundraising made the efforts nonpartisan as they should be in order to be as effective as possible.

If anything Bush's legacy is resurrected because compared to his son, he wasn't nearly as much of a fuck up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
67. Bill Clinton supported Tsunami relief efforts
wow what an evil asshole, I am shocked by such behaviour. Let's purge him from the Democratic Party right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
68. The important thing is always to be attacking Democrats. Never Republicans. Just Democrats.
Edited on Sun Oct-28-07 06:47 AM by Perry Logan
Anything that pops into your head is all right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC