Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Peace Activist, Retired Col. Ann Wright, Detained at Ottawa Airport

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 04:22 PM
Original message
US Peace Activist, Retired Col. Ann Wright, Detained at Ottawa Airport
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/10/25/4814/

US Peace Activist, Retired Col. Ann Wright, Detained at Ottawa Airport

OTTAWA - An American peace activist denied entry into Canada earlier this month is being detained at Ottawa airport.

Retired U.S. Army Col. Ann Wright was to speak at an antiwar news conference with New Democrat MPs on Parliament Hill today.

But while other passengers passed through Customs, Wright was held back.

She was to have been accompanied on the trip by fellow activist Medea Benjamin, but Benjamin was arrested and jailed Wednesday during a protest in Washington.

Wright and Benjamin were refused entry at the Rainbow Bridge in Niagara Falls, Ont., earlier this month because their names are on an FBI crime database.

The women say they shouldn’t be on the database - which is supposed to inform border officials about serious crimes - and that the FBI hasn’t explained why they’re on it.

The pair suspect it’s because they have been arrested at peaceful protests against the war in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. this is what I've been suspecting about those "watch lists"
Edited on Thu Oct-25-07 04:28 PM by Lisa
They've been padded out with the names of those whom the authorities wish to inconvenience or hassle.

My cousin applied for a job in a Canadian government agency, and was red-flagged -- turned out that they had gotten her name mixed up with her mom's (a Japanese-Canadian internee during WWII) and had never bothered to correct it. Also the fact that she played in a folk band and was therefore a potential "political subversive" (really!) made it into her RCMP file.

In the case with Col. Wright -- ironically one of the reasons for the press conference was to protest watch lists. One of the other participants in the forum is Dr. Mazigh (wife of Maher Arar).


"OTTAWA – The NDP is urging the Harper government to allow US Peace Advocates Medea Benjamin and retired US Army Colonel Ann Wright to share their message of peace in a public forum on Parliament Hill scheduled for Thursday.

In a letter sent today to Harper, the Public Safety Minister, and Foreign Affairs Minister, the NDP MPs advised that Medea Benjamin and Col. Ann Wright, cofounders of Code Pink, have been invited to address legislators and representatives of civil society in a public forum to be held in Ottawa on October 25. The letter requested the government to “ensure unimpeded entry into Canada, to enable Ms. Benjamin and Colonel Wright to share their message of peace with Members of Parliament, and the broader community.”

“New Democrats are deeply concerned that Canadian border police are enforcing rules determined not by our own Canadian government, but by the FBI and other US security agencies,” the letter states. “Foreign government ‘watch lists’ should not form the basis for automatically denying entry into Canada of US citizens, or any other nationals. Government policies, not the individuals who oppose them, often present the greater threat to democracy, security and freedom.”

Ms. Benjamin and Colonel Wright will participate in a panel of distinguished experts including Canadian rights advocate and spouse of Maher Arar, Monia Mazigh, and Roch Tassé, Director of the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group."

http://www.ndp.ca/page/5813

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't retaliation against peaceful political dissidents a BAD THING?!!!!
Both the US and Canada are now retaliating against peaceful political dissidents.

Damnit!

Well, ladies, all I can say is, apparently YOU ARE MAKING AN IMPACT!!!! :patriot:
Meanwhile, it's time word about the retaliation and suppression concerning you must get out and about!! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder how she got into Canada?
TSA at its best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think everyone that suspects they may be on the list
should get together and decide a way to prove this expansion of the no fly list is targeting Americans too. Maybe go all on the same day? Or the first and third of the beg. of a month..

Something needs to be done to bring this into FULL VIEW. They'd apparently have massive detaining at the airports and a lot to answer for, wouldn't ya think?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's an interesting idea.
Edited on Thu Oct-25-07 04:48 PM by sicksicksick_N_tired
However, it would have to be on the same day and preferably the same place. Plus, well, some of if not most of us have difficulty financing that sort of activity.

Still,...yours is a notable idea. I'm thinking something like that could produce some attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Agreed, money a big factor, but
I bet there are some pretty big names on that list too. Naomi Wolf for one spoke about her experience of being on the list and mentioned some others on it also. The bigger the name, the more the people, the most effective this would be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Too bad Ted Kennedy's not still on the list - he'd make a big noise. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Kennedy flying COMMERCIAL???? Bwahahahahahaha nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. and no one really knows till they try to board a flight to pass to another country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. MORE at the STAR here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. “It seems completely absurd for Canada to turn around and say that we will adopt the FBI interpretat
The women say they shouldn’t be on the watch list — which is supposed to inform border officials about serious crimes — and that the FBI hasn’t explained why they’re on it.

The pair was listed for convictions on misdemeanours, similar to summary convictions in Canada, and paid related fines of $200 or less.

NDP MP Alexa McDonough, who had invited the women to Canada, urged Ottawa to stop arbitrarily using such watch lists in the absence of clear border policy.

Peaceful protest is “a time-honoured tradition” in Canada, she told a news conference after waiting in vain for Wright to emerge from Customs at the airport.

“It seems completely absurd for Canada to turn around and say that we will adopt the FBI interpretation of events.

“I’ve heard from a great many Canadians how distressed they are that this is another worrisome example of the increasing integration of Canada and U.S. policies.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. REC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. What's going on here?
I haven't heard of this news and I LIVE in Ottawa.

The same with this post by Tierra_y_Libertad:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2134570&mesg_id=2134570
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. More here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. I hope everyone realizes how awful this is--how unconstitutional, illegal and
unamerican. And, even if it were not true that Col. Wright and Medea Benjamin represent the vast majority of Americans, a whopping 70% of whom oppose this war and want it ended, while George Bush and Dick Cheney, who are even now demanding $50 billion MORE of our tax dollars to keep killing Iraqis until they sign over their oil rights, and to keep war profiteer pockets padded to levels that beggar the imagination, represent less than 25% of Americans, if that (Cheney's approval rating was at 17% last time I looked--about a year ago)--even if these things were not true, and Wright and Benjamin were members of a minority, detaining them at the border, for having expressed their views in peaceful protest, would be unconstitutional, illegal and unamerican.

The fact that they represent MOST Americans--while the criminals who are harassing them represent a small minority--just makes it all the more ironic and outrageous.

That it can happen quietly--that it is a struggle for these patriotic Americans to even be noticed, when their rights are grossly violated--is damned scary. I don't use those words very often--"damned scary"--because there are a whole lot of things that are scary, and that not even our congress members seem to give a fuck about. There is hardly a one of them who can prove that he or she was actually elected. That's scary. We know Bush and Cheney weren't. Yet they command our lives and our treasure. And there are a whole lot of real scary laws and unprecedented precedents that could, at any time, be used to bring the fascist boot down on all of us. I don't think it's useful to tell people, "Be afraid." What they need to know is what to DO--based on good, open-eyed analysis of our government.

And there ARE things we can do, right now, that will materially affect our situation, primary among them, working to restore TRANSPARENT vote counting, in state/local venues (where ordinary people still have some potential influence). Transparent vote counting is the bottom line of democracy. Without it, change is not possible. With it, reform can begin occurring very fast. We have a window of opportunity to get this done, I'd say to about 2012. If we have not restored transparent vote counting by then, American democracy will be over, and we will have to reckon with ALL of us being caged in--on "no fly" lists--with no rights, with no recourse, subject to the whims of a fascist government. And I don't think it makes much difference which of the would-be emperors gets anointed by our global corporate predators rulers as "president." None of the frontrunners have disavowed the unbelievable and unprecedented fascist powers that Bush/Cheney have pioneered. Any of them are potential Hitler IIs. You might trust one or another more, but should your right not to be detained without due cause, not to be held without charge for an indefinite period, not to be spied upon and not to be tortured, be a matter of "trust"?

That was the whole point of the American Revolution, it seems to me. If your rights depend on "trust," you WILL lose them. NO ONE can "trusted" not to abuse monarchic power. The rule of laws, not men. That was why so many fought so hard, why so many died, why so many pledged their lives and treasure--to establish a government in which our rights are INHERENT, and and are guaranteed by law, not by individuals who may be President or may be a Homeland Security director, or may be a Blackwater mercenary, or may be the local highway patrol. Enshrined in plainspoken, unambiguous language, as the law of the land.

The right of free speech.
The right not have state-imposed religion.
The right to be secure in our persons and our homes from illegal search and seizure.
The right to know the charges against us, spoken in open court, if we are arrested (habeas corpus).
The right to a speedy and public trial.

The Bush Junta, and complicit Congresses, including the present one, have violated all of these rock-bottom provisions of the Constitution. And hardly a one of them can prove that they were actually elected. And it seems to me that the fact that virtually none of them can prove that they were elected is intimately connected to their view of our rights, to their unconstitutional laws, and to their violations of their oaths of office. What do they care about us or our Constitution if they are no longer beholden to us for their power, but are now beholden to rightwing Bushite electronic voting corporations and their 'TRADE SECRET' vote 'counting' code?

To me, that's the scariest thing of all. But I view the matter very practically--until such time as we no longer have the power or influence to change it. Until then, there IS something we can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. Y'know what, it's time people started just jumping the fence.
Yeah, just like what happens at the other U.S. border.

If Canadian Customs isn't willing to respect due process and civil rights, why should we respect their laws?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC