Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rudy lies -- and the press takes it lying down

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 10:43 AM
Original message
Rudy lies -- and the press takes it lying down

http://pmcarpenter.blogs.com/p_m_carpenters_commentary/2007/10/rudy-lies----an.html


Rudy Giuliani lies. He doesn't merely stretch the truth, as any ambitious pol is wont to do. He just makes stuff up. And when done with abandon, making stuff up is called lying. There is simply no better, no more accurate way to put it -- and in this presidential election cycle, with all that's at stake, we had better start calling a spade a spade, lest we get stuck with another liar of unchecked width and depth.

-snip-

The advanced condition of both Rudy's pathology and journalism's indifference to it was brought home to me early this morning upon reading this entry in the Washington Post: "Giuliani's Bid to Woo New Hampshire Independents Centers on Health Care," written by no less than two Post reporters, the camera-hugging Chris Cillizza and Shailagh Murray.

-snip-

"In the radio spot, Giuliani mentions his battle with prostate cancer and notes that his chances of surviving the disease in America were 82 percent, while in England his chances would have been 44 percent."


This just as naturally caught and then raised my eye. It seemed an astounding "fact," one either uplifting or thoroughly depressing, depending on one's gender and country of residence. It also seemed quite literally unbelievable. Yet there it sat, in print, with no journalistic probing of it.


So, deploying my vast research skills, I Googled "England prostate cancer survival rate," and up popped the Web site of "Cancer Research UK," the "leading funder of cancer research" in the Queen's realm. Want to know what I found?


I shall quote: "The relative five-year survival rate for men diagnosed in England in 2000–01 was 71%," which indicates that Rudy's flat figure of 44 was creatively arrived at, statistically speaking. Not only that, for mates in Rudy's current age group, 60-69, the survival rate is 83 percent -- one uptick higher than his vaunted statistic for us ruggedly male, American individualists. Yet those socialist bastards are doing it on the government plan.
-snip-
-----------------------

we all know Rudy lies, so Chris and Shailagh have some explaining to do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. The U.S. survival rate is based on treated cancer
I don't think it includes everyone who is not treated for it in the U.S. with surgery. Of course they don't make that distinction in the UK since everyone gets the treatment they need.

Here's the U.S.'s glowing statistics:

The patients' ten year survival rates were as follows:

-- Prostatectomy (surgery) 83%
-- Radiotherapy 75%
-- Watchful waiting 72%
-- Hormone therapy 41%
-- Other treatment 71%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Repiglickin Media Wants Rudy to be President, So Rudy can Do No Wrong
If Rudy says the Earth is flat, all the pundits will hold forth about how we were wrong all these years about it being round.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. lots of important lies here, yet the M$M completely ignores them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-28-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. what are those figurines in your sig?
sorry to be off topic but i see them and i am facinated with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC