Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Contradicta Rice's State Department) Officials balked on '05 Blackwater inquiry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:31 AM
Original message
(Contradicta Rice's State Department) Officials balked on '05 Blackwater inquiry
Slightly too old for LBN, but newsworthy nonetheless.


Officials balked on '05 Blackwater inquiry

State Department e-mails obtained by ABC News discuss how to deflect a Times reporter's questions about a civilian shooting death.

By T. Christian Miller, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

October 26, 2007

Even as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice defended her department's oversight of private security contractors, new evidence surfaced Thursday that the U.S. sought to conceal details of Blackwater shootings of Iraqi civilians more than two years ago.

In one instance, internal e-mails show that State Department officials tried to deflect a 2005 Los Angeles Times inquiry into an alleged killing of an Iraqi civilian by Blackwater guards.

"Give what we can and then dump the rest on Blackwater," one State Department official wrote to another in the e-mails, which were obtained by ABC News. "We can't win this one."

One department official taking part in a chain of e-mails noted that the "findings of the investigation are to remain off-limits to the reporter." Another recommended that there be no mention of the existence of a criminal investigation since such a reference would "raise questions and issues."

more...


http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-em...

Gawd forbid those pesky 'questions and issues' get in the way of Condi's diplomattin'. Does anyone know whether there's a possibility she's already perjured herself in testimony already given? Hard to believe she didn't know anything about events that occurred over two years ago. Even if she didn't know, her ignorance is proof of gross incompetence on her part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC