Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MoD knew of crews' fears over Nimrod spy planes years ago

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:43 PM
Original message
MoD knew of crews' fears over Nimrod spy planes years ago
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article3104675.ece

By Andrew Johnson
Published: 28 October 2007
Yet more safety fears over the RAF's ageing Nimrod spy planes have come to light, showing that the fleet continued flying despite hundreds of crew reports warning of potentially lethal faults on the aircraft.

Concerned flight crews complained repeatedly for years about problems ranging from leaking fuel pipes and smoke and fumes coming in from bomb bays, MoD documents confirm.

As part of our Military Covenant campaign, this newspaper has been calling for better equipment for Britain's armed forces.

More than 100 incidents were reported in the months between September last year and June 2007, when the records end. British troops suffered their biggest single loss of the conflict in Afghanistan when a Nimrod crashed in September 2006, killing all 14 aboard. Leaked emails revealed this week that the MoD had been aware of concerns about fuel leaks on that aircraft.

The incidents recorded on the Defence Aviation Centre database all resulted "in the aircraft sustaining damage or a person receiving an injury or which discloses a flight safety hazard or potential hazard". In the past 20 years, pilots and crew have reported about 2,000 such incidents. Other documents obtained under freedom of information legislation show that the planes' manufacturer, BAE Systems, flagged up a potentially lethal problem earlier this year – that if a fire broke out in the bomb bay, there was no mechanism for putting it out.

The fleet of 18 planes was put into service in the late 1960s, and a £3bn project to replace it is behind schedule and over budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Hawker Siddely Nimrod


BTW, this was the same plane that crashed at the Toronto Air Show in 1995.
http://www.pilotfriend.com/disasters/crash/crash.mov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC