Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone explain this Blackwater "immunity" deal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:59 PM
Original message
Can someone explain this Blackwater "immunity" deal?
Edited on Tue Oct-30-07 07:00 PM by Canuckistanian
How can a government agency offer immunity (from prosecution, I imagine), when there is NO court case?

Isn't immunity offered only by prosecution lawyers or US Attorneys in the course of difficult trials?

Or is this some different version of "immunity" that I've never heard of before?

Or, if this IS a legitimate immunity deal, then who is offering it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Doubt Anyone Can
They just make up this shit as they go along---remember Scooter's pardon?

A clear case proving a nation ruled by one man's whim instead of by law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I find this bizarre in the extreme
Have all three branches of government melted into one large putrifying lump?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's Darth Cheney's private death squad,
he decides who gets immunity and who doesn't. Duh! :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I don't think the man understands
How much he'll be hated for generations in Iraq (and elsewhere).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. It was written into Iraqi law, I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Oh, no. Not another one of Bremer's "Laws"
It thought it was referring to US laws.

Things are starting to clear up for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Yup Order # 17 of the 100 orders of Bremer...
Edited on Tue Oct-30-07 09:20 PM by walldude
This immunity thing has been in place since the beginning of the war..

Edit to fix spelling of Bremer.. I guess A-s-s-h-o-l-e didn't quite do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Immunity from possible prosecution or legal action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. But by whom? The DOJ?
Iraqi justice?

And how can you have "pre-emptive immunity"?

Can you REALLY grant immunity even before charges are laid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Anyone. The government (executive branch) is saying it isn't playing ball
on the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. OK. Alright, I get it now.
This isn't "immunity" in the normal sense.

It means "Relax guys, false alarm". Nobody's about to be prosecuted soon.

Right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Pretty much.
They will run interference on efforts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. the State Department (going over the DOJ's head)
Edited on Tue Oct-30-07 09:30 PM by foo_bar
They've deemed it "limited immunity", meaning they can be charged with crimes but not as a direct result of their testimony, so prosecutors can still lodge a case but most of their evidence is off-limits:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Limited immunity has been routinely offered to private security contractors involved in shootings in Iraq, State Department officials said Tuesday, denying such actions jeopardized criminal prosecution of Blackwater USA guards accused of killing 17 Iraqi civilians. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack declined to discuss specifics of the agency's role in the investigation, but said any immunity deals should not stop the Justice Department from prosecuting.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g8-DEMtAE9q4i4ySQ0eV_qZefmRQD8SJS39G0

The FBI took over the case early this month after prosecutors in the Justice Department's criminal division realized they could not bring charges against Blackwater guards based on their statements to the Diplomatic Security investigators, officials said.

Officials said the Blackwater bodyguards spoke only after receiving so-called "Garrity" protections, requiring that their statements be used only internally and not for criminal prosecutions.

http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5hYgmhcK7MrwQHLVu9sDyh9tYHsZw


one last link:

The Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS) is the security and law enforcement arm of the U.S. Department of State. DS is a world leader in international investigations, threat analysis, cyber security, counterterrorism, security technology, and protection of people, property, and information.

http://www.state.gov/m/ds/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Thanks for this
A totally UN-Constitutional mess.

Looks like a situation for the SCOTUS to figure out.

IF it ever gets there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. It means the fix is in.
Obvious coverup of murder and massacres by our federal government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC