Bush had nothing whatever to say. By scheduling this press conference at the precise hour Republicans who oppose his Iraq "surge" began to speak on the House floor, he hogged the TV screen, assuring that the dissenters would not be seen on air.
*
WP: A Man of Many Beliefs Gives a News Conference With Few Answers
By Dana Milbank
Thursday, February 15, 2007; Page A02
President Bush answered in non-answers or in generalities, as in "I believe Iran is an unbelievably vital nation." (By Chip Somodevilla--Getty Images)
President Bush must have heard that National Public Radio was reviving the 1950s program "This I Believe," because his news conference yesterday sounded like an audition.
On Iran: "I believe Iran is an unbelievably vital nation."...
***
Bush has always supported a faith-based initiative, but his recitation of beliefs in the East Room yesterday -- he listed no fewer than 18 principles he holds to be true -- sounded less like a question-and-answer session than a reading of the Nicene Creed. The only thing the president did not believe in was answering the questions he was asked.
When ABC News's Martha Raddatz asked whether he shares the intelligence community's view that Iraq is in a civil war, the Great Believer grew suddenly agnostic. "We've got people on the ground who don't believe it's a civil war," he dodged.
"Do you believe it's a civil war, sir?" Raddatz pressed.
"It's hard for me, you know, living in this beautiful White House, to give you a firsthand assessment," he punted....
***
The president seemed petulant in his refusal to answer questions; he was, after all, the one who summoned reporters to the White House for the purpose of questioning him. Probably, it was the tone of the questions that set him off: While Bush freely voiced his beliefs, the reporters seemed disinclined to accept his statements of faith.
Steve Holland of Reuters asked about Iranian weapons in Iraq. "What makes you so certain that the highest levels of Tehran's government is responsible?"
Bush admitted he doesn't know "whether or not the head leaders of Iran" were involved. "But here's my point: Either they knew or didn't know."...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/14/AR2007021401593.html