Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FEMA trailers making people sick

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 04:21 PM
Original message
FEMA trailers making people sick
www.gorillanewsnetwork.com

FEMA-supplied trailers for displaced Gulf Coast residents have been found to emit formaldehyde vapors, causing serious health problems.
Along the Gulf Coast, in the towns and fishing villages from New Orleans to Mobile, survivors of Hurricane Katrina are suffering from a constellation of similar health problems. They wake up wheezing, coughing and gasping for breath. Their eyes burn; their heads ache; they feel tired, lethargic. Nosebleeds are common, as are sinus infections and asthma attacks. Children and seniors are most severely afflicted, but no one is immune.

There’s one other similarity: The people suffering from these illnesses live in trailers supplied by the Federal Emergency Management Administration.

An estimated 275,000 Americans are living in more than 102,000 travel trailers and mobile homes that FEMA purchased after Hurricane Katrina. The price tag for the trailers was more than $2.6 billion, according to FEMA. Despite their cost of about $15,000 each, most are camperlike units, designed for overnight stays. Even if the best materials had been used in their construction—and that is a point of debate—they would not be appropriate for full-time living, according to experts on mobile homes. The interiors are fabricated from composite wood, particle board and other materials that emit formaldehyde, a common but toxic chemical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hummmmm, makes me wonder, if the trailer was sprayed
with something before giving it to homeless Katrina victims.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wildewolfe Donating Member (470 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Naw...
Edited on Thu Feb-15-07 04:40 PM by Wildewolfe
...thats just part of the normal construction of those... Not saying this is a good thing, but it is a common thing.

Of more concern is why we paid over 25k per trailer if they are only retailed at 15k. That's a bit over a billion dollars of non accounted for overhead...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But Brownie did a heckuva job!! Made someone an extra billion.
It's in the pocket of some boosh supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is the result of
voluntary compliance. Many other countries have set limits for exposure to formaldehyde but the US maintains voluntary guidelines for manufacturers.
There are NO established limits for consumers in the US - the only exposure limits are for workers.

Formaldehyde is a cheap chemical that solves lots of problems for manufacturers so it is used in so many products. Those trailers are gas chambers and the people who are sick will have to deal with this for the rest of their lives - many as totally disabled.

It is already known that 15-20% of the population will have adverse reactions to formaldehyde as it is a known sensitizer. We will continue to push the numbers higher as more and more products have formaldehyde - especially building products.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-18-07 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. hear here!
So true, KT!

Those trailers are gas chambers and the people who are sick will have to deal with this for the rest of their lives - many as totally disabled.

It is already known that 15-20% of the population will have adverse reactions to formaldehyde as it is a known sensitizer. We will continue to push the numbers higher as more and more products have formaldehyde - especially building products.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-18-07 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Dying for a Home" - bump for the larger issue
From the Nation:

Dying for a Home
by AMANDA SPAKE

(from the February 26, 2007 issue)

Along the Gulf Coast, in the towns and fishing villages from New Orleans to Mobile, survivors of Hurricane Katrina are suffering from a constellation of similar health problems. They wake up wheezing, coughing and gasping for breath. Their eyes burn; their heads ache; they feel tired, lethargic. Nosebleeds are common, as are sinus infections and asthma attacks. Children and seniors are most severely afflicted, but no one is immune.

There's one other similarity: The people suffering from these illnesses live in trailers supplied by the Federal Emergency Management Administration.

An estimated 275,000 Americans are living in more than 102,000 travel trailers and mobile homes that FEMA purchased after Hurricane Katrina. The price tag for the trailers was more than $2.6 billion, according to FEMA. Despite their cost of about $15,000 each, most are camperlike units, designed for overnight stays. Even if the best materials had been used in their construction--and that is a point of debate--they would not be appropriate for full-time living, according to experts on mobile homes. The interiors are fabricated from composite wood, particle board and other materials that emit formaldehyde, a common but toxic chemical.

"Formaldehyde is a very powerful irritant," says Mary DeVany, an industrial hygienist in Vancouver, Washington. "When you inhale the vapors...the breathing passages close off." The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified formaldehyde as a human carcinogen. The Environmental Protection Agency has said that more than 0.1 parts per million of formaldehyde in air can cause eye, lung and nose irritation. Few scientists dispute the chemical's power to worsen respiratory health. Yet there is no federal standard for formaldehyde in indoor air, or for travel trailers, and no consensus on whether any "safe" level exists.

Last summer FEMA began distributing a leaflet to trailer residents explaining that the materials used in the interiors can release toxic vapors. The agency suggests residents keep windows and doors open and the air conditioner on, yet reduce heat and humidity. (The Gulf's hot, humid climate increases the rate at which materials release formaldehyde.)

FEMA has not responded to requests for the total number of complaints it has received about formaldehyde--some media reports put the number at forty-six. The agency does say that seventeen trailers in Louisiana had to be replaced because of the chemical.

Many residents suffering from symptoms, however, are afraid to complain to FEMA, fearing the agency will take away the only housing they can afford. It was complaints of respiratory problems to the Sierra Club that led the organization to test fifty-two FEMA trailers last April, June and July. Some 83 percent of the thirteen different types tested had formaldehyde in the indoor air at levels above the EPA recommended limit.

Air sampling by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration at holding stations where groups of trailers were kept before they were set up revealed high formaldehyde levels even in outdoor air. At the holding station in Pass Christian, Mississippi, formaldehyde in outdoor air was thirty to fifty times the level recommended by the EPA, and several times OSHA's workplace standard.

One of the first to notice an unusual number of illnesses among trailer residents was pediatrician Scott Needle of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. "I was seeing kids and families coming in with repeated, prolonged respiratory illnesses--sinus infections, lingering coughs, viral infections that didn't go away," Needle says. The mothers told him that their children had never been sick like this before. Some of the infants had to be hospitalized. "Over the course of three months, I saw several dozen families with these health problems. That's really high, and this isn't something I'd seen in my practice before. All of them were living in FEMA trailers."

Angela Orcut, a preschool teacher, and her 3-year-old son, Nicholas, are typical of Needle's patients. "Ever since we've lived in this trailer, Nickie wakes up every morning choking and coughing," Orcut says. "He's had so many sinus infections since we moved in here." At night, when the family returns to the closed-up trailer, "the smell burns our noses and our eyes," she says.

Like many trailer residents, Orcut has not filed a complaint with FEMA. "I'm afraid if I complain, they'll take the trailer away," she says. "Then where will we live?"

Paul and Melody Stewart have a similar story to tell about their health problems, which began shortly after moving into a FEMA trailer at the site of their storm-ravaged house. "When we got here, it smelled bad," says Paul, a former Waveland, Mississippi, policeman. Melody woke up the first night they stayed in the trailer, gasping for air. "Within a week," he says, "we both had nosebleeds."

One morning the Stewarts found their cherished pet cockatiel lethargic and unable to stand. They rushed the bird to the vet, who said the cockatiel would die if he were kept in the trailer. Stewart began doing research and discovered that the wood products used to make cabinets, walls and other interior parts could emit formaldehyde, especially in hot, humid climates.

He bought a testing kit for airborne contaminants and sent it back for analysis. In winter, with windows open and the air conditioner on, the test showed, the formaldehyde level in the Stewarts' trailer was more than two times the EPA's limit. Still, FEMA refused to replace the trailer until a story about the Stewarts' formaldehyde problems ran on the local television news. FEMA called the next day to say they were bringing a new trailer.

When the new trailer arrived, the couple could smell formaldehyde before they opened the door. Another was delivered with mold covering the walls. The Stewarts lived in their truck until they took what remained of their insurance settlement and their retirement savings to buy a new trailer at a dealer's lot. This one was made with low-formaldehyde-emitting materials. Their respiratory problems are gone, but plans to rebuild their home are on hold.

Hilda Nelson, 75, of Coden, Alabama, was not as lucky as the Stewarts. When she moved into a FEMA trailer at the site of her former house, she was in good health, says her son, Paul. Three weeks later, he says, "she was having trouble breathing." Not long after, she was diagnosed with pneumonia, then congestive heart failure, a chronic illness that can cause breathing difficulties.

In June 2006 Paul Nelson ordered a kit to test his mother's trailer for formaldehyde. The results showed the level of the chemical inside her trailer was 50 percent over the EPA's recommended limit.

Scientists familiar with toxics agree that elderly people, like infants, are highly susceptible to the hazards of formaldehyde, particularly if they have underlying illnesses. "We started testing in Alabama," explains Becky Gillette, co-chair of the Mississippi Sierra Club, "because we got reports from social workers there that so many elderly people living in the trailers were being hospitalized for respiratory conditions. And many of them were dying."

In October 2006, at the age of 76, Hilda Nelson died, one year and one month after moving into her FEMA trailer. Doctors "never had an answer" as to why her health deteriorated so quickly, says her son. "But I have my suspicions. I point the finger at the formaldehyde."



http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070226/spake


The concentrated doses of formaldehyde in our environment are very dangerous to our health. A little googling will bring up articles like this:

Neurobehavioral impairment and seizures from formaldehyde
Archives of Environmental Health, Jan-Feb, 1994 by Kaye H. Kilburn

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0907/is_n1_v49/ai_14930016



The larger message is that we, as a nation, are being slowing poisoned by such chemicals as formaldehyde. Many in the medical field know this but are helpless to speak out. Google and read about "The Tomato Effect" to see what I mean.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-18-07 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Doctors don't know about chemical injury and toxicologists work for industry -- their main job is
Edited on Sun Feb-18-07 06:47 PM by AikidoSoul
mainly to limit liability of employers.

Duppers, the last line of the article you posted said, "In October 2006, at the age of 76, Hilda Nelson died, one year and one month after moving into her FEMA trailer. Doctors "never had an answer" as to why her health deteriorated so quickly, says her son."

"Doctors 'never had an answer'.....

The problem is that medical doctors are only required to take 2 hours worth of toxicology in medical school.

They are brainwashed to believe that the viral / bacterial paradigm is the only one that we need to be concerned with.

The chemical / pharmaceutical industry spends billions of dollars making contact with physicians and "educating" them, via conferences, fully paid-for-seminar vacations, educational materials, etc. NO effort is made to teach about chronic low level exposures to chemicals and the insidious damage they can do to every system in the body

Any doctor or scientist who speaks out about chemical injury is vilified by the extraordinary power and influence wielded by chem/pharm and its lackeys. This is being done all over the world. I have a long list of doctors and scientists whose lives have been ruined for speaking out.

edited for clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-18-07 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks, AS
I know most doctors do not know beans about chemical sensitivity, much less chemical poisoning---just from personal experience. I once had an allergist laugh at me when I related the fact that perfume made me dizzy!

I should have said FEW in the medical field and less in the general public know.

As always, AS, you shed much needed light on an important subject--important to all of us!

:yourock:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-18-07 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. WTF?! Aren't some DUers living in those trailers?
Wow, talk about adding insult to injury! This is a total outrage! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC