Tim Ryan owns the Iraq debate
VIDEO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zx463pjcwA&eurl=As we approach the final day of the debate on this resolution, I have enjoyed the debate thoroughly; I have found it humorous at times...
Our friends on the other side of the aisle have tried every argument they could muster; they've talked about President Clinton; they've talked about Vietnam; they're trying to bring up Israel;
And my friend from Indiana also mentioned something about the issue of consistency; and I find it funny that the pro-life--
the self-proclaimed pro-life party is the party that wants to keep extending the war.I find it ironic that all of the great budget hawks of the Republican Party want to throw 8 billion dollars a month to keep going and going and going as we borrow the money from China;
But I also found the debate at times disappointing; where
members of the other side have questioned our side; when they've said 'Whose side are we on?' and 'How can we say that we support the troops?' and that we're somehow unpatriotic.And I would just like to say that, you know, when the Republican Party and this President didn't send enough troops,
we didn't call you unpatriotic; and when you sent our young soldiers over there without the body armor, we never called you unpatriotic....................
So if you vote against this resolution, you're voting to send our troops over there without the proper equipment. Before it could be excused. Because we trusted the president and assumed, but now we know. And finally, Mr. Speaker, we've heard a lot over the past couple days about the American Revolution, and the Civil War, and World War Two. Well Mr. Speaker,
our President today is not Washington, he is not Lincoln, and he is not Roosevelt. And so I think our Republican colleagues should take the advice of the Secretary of Defense, and that is YOU GO TO WAR WITH THE PRESIDENT YOU HAVE. You don't go to war with the President you wish you had.more at:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/2/16/11256/2058