Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Goodbye, Dolly: Rejecting Cloned Food

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 10:12 AM
Original message
Goodbye, Dolly: Rejecting Cloned Food
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/feb2007/tc20070215_290758.htm?campaign_id=rss_daily

The executive director of the World Society for the Protection of Animals on why Americans should say no to food from animal clones

by Dr. Allan Kornberg

Over the past decade, news of Dolly's birth and subsequent announcements that scientists succeeded in producing clones of cows, pigs, goats, and other animals—even cats and dogs—have been hailed as amazing advances in biotechnology. The fact that Dolly died prematurely of a lung disease that typically afflicts much older sheep, and more importantly, the severity of animal suffering and the welfare issues associated with cloning, have not been as widely reported.

In a country where current farming practices already produce more meat than we can consume, we must ask ourselves the question, "Just because we can produce food from cloned animals, should we?" To those of us who care about animal welfare and the suffering that cloning animals for food will cause, the answer is a resounding, "No."

The FDA has said that it "does not have authority to address the ethics of animal cloning," but the evidence for welfare problems in animal clones is scientifically verified and huge in its scale and depth. The FDA's December, 2006 statement that "Cloning poses no unique risks to animal health," is misleading. Most clone embryos die before birth, and many of the few clones that are born alive suffer from serious abnormalities and premature death. In addition, many of the animals being cloned are those with particularly high productivity, such as cows with excessively large udders that produce more milk but also suffer from major leg problems and painful diseases. It is unconscionable to use biotechnology to knowingly create animals that will suffer in order to produce milk and meat that most Americans would prefer not to consume. If the FDA refuses to listen to reason and allows these products to be brought to market, they must be labeled so that consumers can make informed choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. More like warning labels for informed choice, like cigarettes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC