Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Death by Dust

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 10:30 AM
Original message
Death by Dust
The frightening link between the 9-11 toxic cloud and cancer

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0648,lombardi,75156,2.html

This is not the story of rescue and recovery workers at ground zero getting sick with respiratory illnesses from their exposure; you have read those stories, and you have heard those cases.

This is the story of 9-11 and cancer.
To date, 75 recovery workers on or around what is now known as "the Pile"—the rubble that remained after the World Trade Center towers collapsed on the morning of September 11, 2001—have been diagnosed with blood cell cancers that a half-dozen top doctors and epidemiologists have confirmed as having been likely caused by that exposure.

Those 75 cases have come to light in joint-action lawsuits filed against New York City on behalf of at least 8,500 recovery workers who suffer from various forms of lung illnesses and respiratory diseases—and suggest a pattern too distinct to ignore. While some cancers take years, if not decades, to develop, the blood cancers in otherwise healthy and young individuals represent a pattern that experts believe will likely prove to be more than circumstantial. The suits seek to prove that these 8,500 workers—approximately 20 percent of the total estimated recovery force that cleared the rubble from ground zero—all suffer from the debilitating effects of those events.

The basis for the suits stems from the plaintiffs' argument that the government—in a desperate attempt to revive downtown in the wake of the catastrophic events on 9-11—failed to protect workers from cancer-causing benzene, dioxin, and other hazardous chemicals that permeated the air for months. Officials made these failures worse by falsely reassuring New Yorkers that they faced no long-term dangers from exposure to the air lingering over ground zero.

"We are very encouraged that the results from our monitoring of air-quality and drinking-water conditions in both New York and near the Pentagon show that the public in these areas is not being exposed to excessive levels of asbestos or other harmful substances," Christine Todd Whitman, the then administrator of the EPA, told the citizens of New York City in a press release on September 18—only seven days after the attacks. "Given the scope of the tragedy from last week, I am glad to reassure the people of New York . . . that their air is safe to breathe and the water is safe to drink."
More............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. alpha radiation short term fallout from the nukes
The thermite/thermate hypothesis is absurd,
the towers were brought down by next generation micro-nuclear weapons
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0510/0510071.pdf
http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/military.htm
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html

Blood disorders are the result of alpha radiation exposure, yes, and
all the illnesses are coming on too soon as they are disorders of
a different nature than from inhaled fallout particles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. What was the cause of the 9/11 toxic cloud? Where did it come from?
The building itself, the bodies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The building
It was loaded with asbestos. A few years earlier there was a figure tossed around about how much it would cost to remove it all . The amount was more than the building was worth.

Toss in all the pulverized concrete, chemicals in the building,toxic materials from computers and such and you have yourself one hell of a toxic soup.

Bodies ,what bodies? They couldnt find anything bigger than half a telephone pad. No desks no computers, no nothing, just steel and finely pulverized concrete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That is why they (the towers) were selected as the target.
The lawsuits that would have resulted in a normal demolition were too potentially expensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC