Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush taking more authority over military lawyers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 10:22 AM
Original message
Bush taking more authority over military lawyers
This guy is way too dangerous; why can't Pelosi see that?

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/061114.php

Bush taking more authority over military lawyers
12.15.07 -- 9:24AM
By Steve Benen

The Bush administration? Undermining the independence of military lawyers with a dubious power grab? You don't say.

The Bush administration is pushing to take control of the promotions of military lawyers, escalating a conflict over the independence of uniformed attorneys who have repeatedly raised objections to the White House's policies toward prisoners in the war on terrorism.

The administration has proposed a regulation requiring "coordination" with politically appointed Pentagon lawyers before any member of the Judge Advocate General corps - the military's 4,000-member uniformed legal force - can be promoted.

A Pentagon spokeswoman did not respond to questions about the reasoning behind the proposed regulations. But the requirement of coordination - which many former JAGs say would give the administration veto power over any JAG promotion or appointment - is consistent with past administration efforts to impose greater control over the military lawyers.

The former JAG officers say the regulation would end the uniformed lawyers' role as a check-and-balance on presidential power, because politically appointed lawyers could block the promotion of JAGs who they believe would speak up if they think a White House policy is illegal. (emphasis added)


Charlie Savage's piece, which is well worth reading, adds that the plan would direct broad new power over the JAGs to William "Jim" Haynes, the Bush-appointed general counsel at the Pentagon, best known for writing the Pentagon's infamous 2002 policies endorsing physical and mental duress on terror prisoners, and reportedly cutting top military lawyers out of the loop if they were likely to object.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. He is moving fast.
It's the endgame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It certainly is and they have much more to do to finish it by January 2009.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. He say he is in "Sprint mode"
I suspect that everything we have seen in the last seven years woin't hold a candle to what is coming up..He has absolutely nothing to lose and he knows now is the time.. The Democrats are helpless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. the shit pile deepens with every passing hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bottom Line
The infusion of conservative values in the JAG corps will do away with competence as a gage for promotion. Lawyers in conservative world should talk politics, not the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. Please K & R. This is under the radar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. soviet-style 'political' officers ?
wow, what a horrid concept
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. They're trying to prevent another Lt. Swift
Edited on Sat Dec-15-07 06:10 PM by Marie26
Guantánamo defense lawyer forced out of Navy

By Carol Rosenberg

Lt. Cmdr. Charles Swift defended bin Laden driver

NEWARK, N.J. — The Navy lawyer who took the Guantánamo case of Osama bin Laden's driver to the U.S. Supreme Court — and won — has been passed over for promotion by the Pentagon and must soon leave the military.

Lt. Cmdr. Charles Swift, 44, said last week he received word he had been denied a promotion to full-blown commander this summer, "about two weeks after" the Supreme Court sided against the White House and with his client, a Yemeni captive at the U.S. Navy base in southeast Cuba. ...

Still at Guantánamo as an enemy combatant, Hamdan halted his war-crimes trial by challenging the format's constitutionality through civilian courts.

The justices ruled in June that Bush overstepped his constitutional authority by creating ad hoc military tribunals for prisoners at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, sending the Pentagon back to the drawing board for the trials.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003294468_lawyer08.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is a very dangerous move.
It will end any independence within the JAG and consequently remove their ability to check unconstrained illegal military activities by the executive, for example torture of prisoners, illegal tribunals, and other war crimes.

It is another step toward dictatorship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kickysnana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-15-07 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC