Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Empowering Veterans, Inc. Unveils its "Worst 10" Senators

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:16 PM
Original message
Empowering Veterans, Inc. Unveils its "Worst 10" Senators
Empowering Veterans, Inc. Unveils its "Worst 10" list of incumbent Senators up for reelection in 2008. These people are very pious in the "Support the Troops" rhetoric, but most hypocritical when it comes to voting to support members of the Armed Forces and their families and veterans and their families.


Empowering Veterans Unveils it "Worst 10" List of Senators

My name is Ralph Parrott. I am a 65 year old retired Navy Supply Corps Captain and retired businessman from Fairfax Station, Virginia. I served in the US Navy from March 1963 until September of 1990, over 27 years.

(snip)
The "Worst 10" on issues relating to members of the Armed Forces and their families and veterans and their families are:

Alexander of Tennessee
Chambliss of Georgia
Cochran of Mississippi
Coleman of Minnesota
Cornyn of Texas
Dole of North Carolina
Graham of South Carolina
Roberts of Kansas
Sessions of Alabama
Sunnunu of New Hampshire

more
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/2/20/91939/0056
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick to keep exposing this bullshit. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edith Ann Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Senators
I just passed out. Imoff of Oklahoma isn't on the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. The website is up and running. . .
www.empoweringveterans.org

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Normie scored!
Which post-Congressional job is waiting for him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Hey, I missed that the first time around
Can you say Senator Franken?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mconvente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wow, their ALL republics... gee, there's a concept...
So who really supports the troops - I think a great majority of the American people know it's the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is the truth - something the corpmedia will NOT acknowledge.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hypocrisy thy name is repug...... nant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. I just sent MY Senaator, Saxby, an email, congratulating him on
making it to the TOP 10!

I sent him the link to the actual article with the map, and then asked him is this made him PROUD!

AH! I know I won't hear from him, butit made me feel better to at least tell him how much we really LIKE him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks for the idea! Did the same:
Congratulations! You made the Top Ten Senator Dole:

http://www.empoweringveterans.org/

NEVER SERVED IN THE MILITARY AND IS NOT SERVING THEM NOW
Awarded a Grade of D- by the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America
Awarded a Rating of 0% in 2004 by the Disabled American Veterans
Awarded a Rating of 42% in 2005 by the Disabled American Veterans
Awarded a Rating of 60% in 2006 by the Disabled American Veterans
The Lives of Military Personnel OR Tax Cuts for the Rich Dole voted “NO” to:
$25.41 Billion for increased military procurement of equipment.
(S Roll Call 008, 02/02/2006)
$16.9 Billion for increased Army maintenance funding.
(S Roll Call 008, 02/02/2006)
$4.5 Billion for increased Marine Corps maintenance funding.
(S Roll Call 008, 02/02/2006)

Please do not run in 2008 and allow a deserving member of society fill your slot. Governor Easley would fit just nicely!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
34. Didn't dear Libby get into murky waters when she
Edited on Wed Feb-21-07 03:11 AM by anitar1
was head of the Red Cross. Seems as if there were some financial questions, if I recall correctly. she resigned soon after that.Nothing more was heard about the matter. edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. They left out McCain and Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R
I want to hear those fuckers tell me again how *I* don't support the troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. And of course they are ALL REPUBLICANS!
k/r

Coleman and Sunnunu can be ousted next year!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Republicons HATE troops and veterans of the US Armed Services
They love to honk the patriot horn, but they vote against the troops and veterans over and over and over, so they will have more money to give to their fat-cat war-profiteer republicon cronies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Wars are cheaper if the soldiers don't survive them.
Therefore, the Republicans skimp on protection for the troops in the field and caretaking after they return broken and insane.

After all, troops, like oil and profits, are fungible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Oh, I see, that's why they fancy themselves conservatives!
They conserve by skimping on our sons and daughters in uniform, giving them shitty subpar equimpment manufactured by fat cat War Profiteering republicon cronies, and they 'conserve' by giving shitty, or no, health care and benefits for our veterans. That leaves more gravy for the republicon war profit pigs. Very clever. Very traitorous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Fuckin' A.
Edited on Tue Feb-20-07 10:13 PM by sofa king
This might be a good time and place to bring up two-time Congressional Medal of Honor winner and military coup (in America) foiler Smedley Butler.

In his blunt treatise War is a Racket, Butler proposed a few simple measures which would almost certainly reduce the numbers of wars-for-profit that Americans were already notorious for starting. One suggestion was to "conscript" the war industries in time of war--that is, eliminating profits and paying everyone, especially the executives, the same as a private in the U.S. Army. Another was to have the soldiers themselves vote on whether or not to have the war. A third suggestion was to restrict the defense budget to the point where an offensive war is no longer feasible.

I'd like to go a step further and have mandatory conscription for the children of all current and former Members of Congress and Senate-approved employees of the Executive Branch. I'd also like to see a universal wartime profits tax of 100% above the salary of a middle class American.

If you make people pay to fight instead of profit from it, I suspect the world will become a much, much more peaceful place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. That's not true. They don't 'hate' the veterans.
Edited on Tue Feb-20-07 10:57 PM by TahitiNut
They're indifferent to them (like a jogger is indifferent to ants on their path). But they LOVE the money and the PROFITEERING from the death and injury to others!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. One more reason for Franken to run in Minnesota
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. Gee, and they're all "We Love the Troops" Repugs...
Making the world safe for hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. I believe it, but how come Mitch isn't on there? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. Seven of them are from the south.
Lindsay Graham and Lizzie Dole?

I'm guessing the freepers are busy dissing Captain Parrot for picking on their congress critters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. And Graham was a military lawyer? I don't know how that creature
manages to spill words that make him sound compassionate and a little normal. He is not. He will always be remembered by me for his unusually enthusiastic mission to castigate Clinton with his little sneers and 'hard, pompous work'. Wasn't he the one in a team who delivered the House verdict to the Senate? What an uppity moralistic pontificator. Now we know just how moralastic he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #23
37. He is the evil spawn of the devil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Any right-winger attempting to besmirch Ralph's character is wasting his/her time
I know Ralph and his spouse personally. We worked together securing signed petitions getting Jim Webb on the ballot in Virginia, and throughout the primary.

Ralph and his wife are honorable, decent people of the highest integrity. Too bad the same thing can't be said of the Congressional Representatives and Senators named on Ralph's website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
22. K&R. The usual suspects, but Biddy DOLE? da Viagra's been straying? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. All southern Senators, except for Sunnunu, Roberts and Coleman
Why do they hate the troops?

I think it's time to reveal their contempt for real service men and women.

And thanks for revealing your identity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
28. Kick
:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkyisBlue Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
29. Sununu was the Repub. caught up in the phone-jamming scandal in NH.
Wonder if he would have won without cheating?

He has every reason to be afraid of being thrown out of office next year. In the recent election, our two Repub Representatives (Bass and Bradley) were defeated by Democratic candidates. There seems to be every indication that voters are not happy with Sununu either. The only good thing I can say about Sununu is he's better than our other Repub Senator, Judd Gregg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
30. HA HA--------so the Repugs SUPPORT the troops Huh??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
31. Tony Snow says Bush "certainly was aware" of conditions at Abu Reed Building 18


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3123976&mesg_id=3123976

Tue Feb-20-07 03:10 PM
Original message
Tony Snow says Bush "certainly was aware" of conditions at Abu Reed Building 18 Updated at 5:06 PM

Snow: President Bush ‘Certainly’ Was ‘Aware Of The Conditions In The Wards’ At Walter Reed

In today’s press briefing, a reporter asked White House Press Secretary Tony Snow about the Washington Post’s two-part series over the weekend, highlighting the Walter Reed hospital’s dilapidated conditions. Snow stated that “the president certainly has been aware of the conditions in the wards where he has visited, and visited regularly.” Snow also affirmed that the administration was aware of Walter Reed’s conditions “before the articles appeared in the paper.” Watch it:

The Army began repairs on the facilities yesterday, only after the media reports and intense public criticism. Apparently, Bush is fine with U.S. troops living in squalid conditions — as long as no one else knows about it.

(The Progress Report has more on the state of veterans under the Bush administration. Read it and sign up to receive the newsletter HERE.)

More:
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/20/bush-walter-reed /
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
32. Oh wow-what a surprise-they are ALL Republicans
Not...

There ya go Freepers...your party really "supports the troops" doesn't it :eyes:?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
33. Well then the troops must hate the troops.
Why else would you speak out against a prowar republican senator?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
35. Why am I having images of Star Ship Troopers?
keep pushing you assholes... and you just may get it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
36. All lapel pins, no action. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. There should be a lapel pin for Congress critters who have actually served.
Edited on Wed Feb-21-07 11:36 AM by Straight Shooter
Or a lapel pin for those who have children currently serving.

That way, when they get up in public and start spouting off about escalating the war, or "standing down when Iraqis stand up," and other such bullshitsical nonsense, we can look at their lapel and see whether they know from firsthand experience what war is really all about.

McCain is a weird one, though. He's lost control of his mental faculties. We can paste the lapel on his forehead to show the extent of how seriously some men can be damaged by the ravages of war, particularly when combined with blind political ambition.

edit to add: SalmonChantedEvening, we can call the "all lapel pin, no action" Congressmen, "Lapel Republicans." Sounds French, too :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Mais Oui! Certainement!
McCain never thought all this posturing would would be necessary when running a Catering Business. Weathervane politics in action, that man.


I always try to make in clear when I speak of service, I tread lightly. I have never served, and I glean the nature of it solely from those accounts vets would speak of. What matters most to me is the dignity that these people deserve is being taken away from them by a corporate bungler and his cashbag junkie pals. I can scream at the top of my lungs that bunnypants is an inept idiot without fear because of the people who serve and defend that wondrous liberty.


There is no way to justify what is being done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC