Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shame, shame, shame

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 04:40 PM
Original message
Shame, shame, shame
WHY on earth is the "hearing" being shown wall-to-wall on what used to pass for "news channels"?

JUST BURY THAT POOR WOMAN SOMEWHERE, AND FIGHT OVER HER CARCASS IN PRIVATE.

They can always exhume the casket and move it later if necessary.

I know she was a "public" figure, but SHEEZ,, she did not discover a cure for cancer, solve the middle east crisis, serve in public office or any other vital-to-humanity service.

She was famous for being pretty. It's beyond obscene to have the whole country sitting around watching as her "family and friends" pick her bones clean :puke:

Every family has "problems", and just because someone's famous, the general public should NOT have the right to know intimate details of their family histories.. It's indecent.

Shame on the judge for not having this be a private hearing.

Anna sounds like a typical "wild-child" growing up, and with a cop for a Mom it's not a stretch to see how there would be "issues" between them. Most "wild-child" kids do not become rich and famous, and eventually there is a denouement within the families, but in this case it did happen. The fact that they were estranged should have NO bearing on where she is buried.

She bought TWO cemetery plots when her son died.. THAT fact says it all..

Let that poor woman rest in peace..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. She was famous for being pretty.
Oh, that's not what she was famous for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. I find myself feeling very, very sick for the child involved
in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm just glad she's too young to be involved in this, but she will grow up
and i can imagine her as a 10 year old surfing the net reading and watching all this stuff about her mother..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think the judge is cashing in on his 15 minutes of fame, and the media
whores are fulfilling his wish. God forbid they actually have to do something productive, like work, or dig up stories (apologies to Dana Priest), or report on actual news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laruemtt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. they're OCD - they glom onto a "story"
and can't let it go. that, and they're just plain lazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Poor Anna Nicole. She always wanted publicity, but I doubt this is what she had in mind.
She bought TWO cemetery plots when her son died.. THAT fact says it all


That indeed says a lot. Her intention at the time is quite clear, and it hasn't been that long ago, so it's doubtful much changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. OK, well then SHAME on me too
Edited on Tue Feb-20-07 05:02 PM by TNOE
but I am honestly interested in this. Its not so much about Anna, as about a little innocent baby - and maybe a murder. The more I hear, the more I am beginning to seriously consider the fact that Howard K. Stern did indeed intentionally give Daniel the Methodone, which no doubt killed him. And then oooppps, Anna Nicole dies - suddenly and the story with the nurse is fishy as hell. The nurse doesn't call 9/11, calls the body guard and Howard first - and Howard is "unreachable" for 2 hours! What kind of freaking nurse was she?!! AND, she said she didn't know how long Anna had been laying there not breathing because she was busy doing other things. Its in a motel room for God's sake, how far away or out of sight could she have been - adn what in the hell was she so busy with. I say give the nurse immunity and get her under oath! I feel like now I'm watching a murder mystery unfold.

Apparently Anna Nicole wanted to get Howard K. Stern out of her life there for a bit - and refused his calls for awhile, etc. - then he's back, and then Daniel's dead, and now Anna is dead - and he has the baby, which I don't believe for a second is his.

The tragedy would be IF he IS a murderer - and he somehow gets away with it. Another OJ case, but worse, because there is a baby involved.

Ooopppssss - & on Edit: Howard bought the burial plots - not Anna. They are in his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meldroc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Breaking news! Anna Nicole Smith is still dead!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. It is beyond sickening
but it's fall down funny watching the taking head vultures and the media hacks discuss others who are doing exactly what they're doing -making money off a dead woman.

Everytime I think MSM can't sink lower, they dive deeper :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Howard K Stern said 4 cemetery plots
He said something like she wanted them all to be together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Hmm. I had heard about two, but FOUR makes it even more likley that
she did not want to be buried anywhere but next to her son, and that she was planning to stay there permanently..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC