Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whoa whoa whoa WHOA...hang on here...Am I really seeing this?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:06 PM
Original message
Whoa whoa whoa WHOA...hang on here...Am I really seeing this?
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 06:07 PM by WilliamPitt
Justice Dept. Sets Criminal Inquiry Into C.I.A. Tapes
By MARK MAZZETTI and DAVID JOHNSTON
Published: January 2, 2008

WASHINGTON — Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey said Wednesday that the Justice Department had elevated its inquiry into the destruction of Central Intelligence Agency interrogation videotapes into a formal criminal investigation to be headed by an outside prosecutor.

The announcement is the first sign that investigators believe C.I.A. officers, possibly along with other government officials, may have committed criminal acts in their handling of the tapes, which depicted the interrogations in 2002 of two Al Qaeda operatives and were destroyed in 2005.

The tapes were never provided to the Sept. 11 commission or to the courts, and the question of whether to destroy them was for nearly three years the subject of deliberations at the highest levels of the Bush administration.

Mr. Mukasey assigned an outside investigator, a federal prosecutor from Connecticut, to lead the criminal inquiry in tandem with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The prosecutor, John H. Durham, is likely empanel a grand jury to hear testimony to determine whether there is enough evidence to bring criminal charges, which could include obstruction of justice.

As an outside prosecutor, Mr. Durham oversaw an investigation into the F.B.I.’s use of mob informants in Boston. He has been lead prosecutor in several successful corruption cases in Connecticut.

More: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/washington/02cnd-intel.html?_r=1&hp=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1199314920-RsEHPhPx3i81I86I25dT7g

=====

JOHN H. DURHAM TO INVESTIGATE MISSING TORTURE TAPES; BUSH SAID TO PEE
Posted by Archer

Wednesday, January 02, 2008

All I know is, if I were being investigated by John H. Durham, I'd probably save him the trouble and commit suicide.

Durham is the First Assistant United States Attorney in the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut. Durham shaves with a .45 and brushes his teeth with a wire grille brush. He is so incorruptible that when Angelina Jolie propositioned him he immediately jumped out of the window and deliberately fractured both his knees so he couldn't do anything. Then he called his wife and made her drive him to confession.

Okay, I made that up. But it's true that when the city of Boston got caught discovered that its FBI office was in bed with the mob and had been murdering people and framing other people for the murders, they called in John H. Durham. Within five minutes all the bad guys were in maximum security.

This pissed off the mob and they tried to kill Durham, but the cops loved Durham so much they volunteered by the dozen to stake out his house. Cops generally love Durham. Hell, even defense lawyers love Durham. He's Dudley Do-Right but somehow he manages not to be a jerk about it. Nobody can figure out how.

I hope when he is finished with this investigation the Capo goes to jail. Durham has never lost a case.

Of course he never had one in which the Capo could pardon himself, either.

http://lawyerworldland.blogspot.com/2008/01/john-h-durham-to-investigate-missing.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. I knew a guy, who knew a guy, who got prosecuted by that guy!
Seriously though, I did hear about a friends friend who got busted in Boston in a federal probe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:10 PM
Original message
I'll take your word for it, Will and I just want to add:
Sweeeeeet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R..........n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yep. Ain't it grand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. He is a Republican, though -- WP
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/02/AR2008010202060.html?hpid=topnews

He is a registered Republican, according to Connecticut voter records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. So was Fitzgerald. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. No.
Patrick Fitzgerald is not now, nor has ever been, a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. I thought I remembered reading that
maybe because he was republican-appointed.
Mea Culpa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Self delete - posted wrong spot
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 06:28 PM by Junkdrawer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. You could have read
it, because some people on DU have claimed that numerous times. However, it is not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I *did* get that information here
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. I think that
a couple people who had an agenda that included spreading misinformation started that rumor on DU. After seeing it a few rimes, a number of good people believed it. Sadly, that is the way that disinformation campaigns work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #38
81. There is a deeper issue, but I can't speak to its validity...

some claim that Fitzgerald became compromised in the investigation of the '93 bombing of the WTC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #81
87. That is something
that I do not consider to be serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #28
53. Here is a very interesting 2005 WP about Fitzgerald that discusses his
background. I'm excerpting the portion about his lack of political affiliation, but the whole article is quite interesting.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A55560-2005Feb1

Fitzgerald is careful to be apolitical in his targets and his public life alike. He registered to vote as an Independent in New York, only to discover, when he began receiving fundraising calls, that Independent was a political party. He re-registered with no affiliation, as he did later in Chicago.

He spit fire last year when reporters asked whether the racketeering indictment of Muhammad Hamid Khalil Salah, a fundraiser for the Islamic militant group Hamas, was timed to boost President Bush's reelection campaign. The case was trumpeted first by Attorney General John Ashcroft.

"I am not running for an election. I'm not part of a political party," Fitzgerald said at the time. "The election is irrelevant to this case. The reason we brought this case now is we're ready to proceed."

Nor has Fitzgerald signaled where his own ambitions lie. He insists that he has already advanced further than his imaginings, but he is clearly aware of his emerging star status. Asked about the notion of becoming FBI director after Robert Mueller, another prosecutor who quit private practice to put bad guys behind bars, he laughs. "That's probably Director Mueller when he's having a bad day, trying to unload it on somebody else."

He did not say he was uninterested, just that he is not thinking beyond his current job.

In the high-profile Chicago job, he still works killer hours and he chairs the attorney general's advisory panel on terrorism. And while he will not publicly discuss details of love, politics or religion, others say his social life has improved, along with his apartment. "It's a really nice place. My wife walked in and said, 'I know Pat's got a girlfriend,' " says Comey. "Fitz wouldn't know eggshell from burnt orange, but he's got a life."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
56. he was appointed by the republican senator- same name-fitzgerald
to clean democratic machine in illinois instead he brought down the republican machine. he`s finally getting around to taking down the democrats starting with the governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. I also seem to remember he was an Independent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
62. How do you know what he is?
There is no party registration in Illinois.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. Most of his life
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 08:21 PM by H2O Man
has not been spent in Illinois.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Good point
I have been following his investigations in Illinois for so long it just seems like forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #26
72. Pls forgive me, but regardless, I do wish he'd gotten more results. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. So were Archie Cox, Eliot Richardson and William Ruckleshaus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. True. I do hope he is in the same league.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. It is a step in the right direction.
Actually, I'm thrilled with enthusiasm...but trying to not get disappointed at the same time.:thumbsup: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
61. And more recently,
Judge Reggie Walton. I can remember some people were concerned that because he was a conservative republican, he would favor Libby. I could appreciate why people were concerned then, and I do now, as well. But there are times when a conservative republican can be perfect for a specific situation. It depends on two things: the situation, and the individual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. There ARE honest Republicans.
Take note that the party isn't running them for office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
50. If I was an honest Republican, I'd want all the Republican criminals apprehended.
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 07:07 PM by Kablooie
To clean house would be better for the party in the long run.

Unless there weren't any Republicans left, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandyd921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R!
Wow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. O holee fuck! The opening of that second article! Bwahaha! K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. I passed out holding my breath for impeachment, I would probably do the same with this
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. John Durham
is a serious man, Mr. Pitt. I am surprised the AG picked him.

You may remember him from the Boston case involving the FBI and mob. There is a book about the corruprion titled "Black Mass"; it focuses on the crimes before Reno put Mr. Durham on the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I've read it twice, and was here for all that stuff.
Yeah, the name is a familiar one.

Be sure to read both the Boston Globe and Boston Herald tomorrow. Give special emphasis to the Globe; they were the ones who did the best reporting on the Bulger/FBI scheme, and the two guys who wrote "Black Mass" were Globe journalists.

Interesting as Hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
51. You did notice the limited scope of the investigation right? He isn't going to investigate
the illegal torture or rendering of people. He is not going to investigate the many frauds of the BCF. He is only going to investigate the burning of the tapes. What about the lies that there were no records? It is a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. Yeah, I did.
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 07:24 PM by WilliamPitt
That's why I asked.

Am I seeing this?

Apparently not. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
64. Not good enough. A special counsel is needed on this one. n/t
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 08:15 PM by Zorra
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. In and of
itself, it is absolutely not enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think that Chuck Schumer will be vindicated with Mukasey
I stood up for Schumer and had my head handed to me here for my giving Chuck Schumer the benefit of the doubt on Mukasey.

Mukasey was the best we could have gotten from this President as A.G.

While this will not satisfy everyone, it is a good move and I'm welcoming it.

Thanks for the article.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. I'll write my apology and put it safely away in a sealed envelope.
Yes. That's what I'll do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
42. I think that's a fair thing to do.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
44. I do not have
a very high opinion of the Attorney General. Thus, I am surprised that he would select John Dunham. It is certainly possible that Mr. Mukasey was deserving of Senator Schumer's support.

While I assume that there are people who will look to make this into something other than a serious investigation, I am confident that Mr. Dunham is the best we could get from this Attorney General. This could become very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm holding off on getting too excited till I understand the difference
between a "special" prosecutor and an "outside" prosecutor.

From what I've read here this person still reports to Mukasey, so... I'm not sure how much this is worth, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. Good news, I guess. Looks like Mukasey's caught between them
the buck has to stop either with the CIA or the White House, and someone like Rodriguez must be threatening to protect himself and sing. Mukasey wants to survive 2009, so he's acting to get it out to somewhere where he can't be blamed for not investigating.

Please note that this paean to Durham is long on the metaphor, but let's hope it's even 50% true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. Patrick Fitzgerald was supposed to be our man of justice
but somehow he felt it acceptable to let Rove lie to him four times before accepting his fifth testimony of "the truth". Nothing will stick to any of these assholes and nothing will be done about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HERVEPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Ahhh, somebody else with a memory (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
36. I Have to Admit
I have little faith in this system. I hope I am wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gonnuts Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
84. Call me cynical
Call me cynical but I can't see anyone Mukasey appoints to investigate anything doing anything that would harm this administration.

The article itself says that stonewalling is all but inevitable and if anything comes close to looking like indictments of higher-ups or impeachment might come to fruition look for a nice little orchestrated attack(s)from those there terrorists to take our minds off of justice and ratchet up the fear factor for the coming election.

Prediction: Jose Rodriquez falls on the sword and gets pardoned by W.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. Very nice :) K&R!!
Looks promising :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. Oh god, I hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. Heard someone on the radio describe it like this:
"the list of possible defendants grows by the week. The seriousness of the crimes has already surpassed Watergate.." etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
23. Interesting, but
until I actually see some results other than the usual BS, I'm going to reserve judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
24. Whaaa?
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
choie Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
32. hello?
Are we all forgetting who Mukasey is? The guy who would not give an opionion as to whether waterboarding is torture or not? There is no way this guy or this Justice Department, with all its Bush minions from Liberty Law School or wherever, will vigorously investigate the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Here is another note of caution from the TPM:
There's some question about whether it is proper to call Durham an "outside counsel." He will not have the independence of Patrick Fitzgerald, for example, in the Plame investigation; rather, as acting U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, he will report to the deputy attorney general just like any other U.S. attorney. The U.S. Attorneys Office for the Eastern District of Virginia has recused itself, presumably because most of the most important terrorism cases have been handled by that office.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Ahhhhh..... How Convenient (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #37
57. sounds like he`s "going by the book"
i`ll go with the following the proper procedures for now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #37
77. Jonathan Turley: This guy's boss is the AG-->the WH. A different command structure needed!
Edited on Thu Jan-03-08 10:49 AM by seafan
Criminal Probe Opened Over CIA Tapes


This is the *catch* in an otherwise seemingly competent counsel--- John Durham will STILL report to the people he is investigating.

We won't be fooled again.


Chuck and Diane, that obviously doesn't apply to you.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
34. I'm from Missouri... Show me...
Rudy was an "incorruptible" mob prosecutor too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
35. whoa is right
I naturally presumed it was gonna be one of these type of tiresomely predictable procedures.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3121838&mesg_id=3121884

Pleased to possibly be wrong in this instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
39. Reading WilliamPitt's take gives me a little more hope.

And I do remember Cox, Richardson, et al. But, it's been such a long time since we saw honorable people in D.C.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
40. The "investigation" will take more than 384 days to complete
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 06:33 PM by SoCalDem
and once September rolls around, people will forget all about it with the campaign frenzy..

the new president will feel pressure to "quit wasting money", and the whole thing will just fade away and we will all stare at the sunset, link arms and sing cumbaya :eyes:..like democrats have done since time began..they will forget and forgive and the criminals will slink back to texas and lick their wounds, only to return again..(hopefully after I am dead and gone :)..)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockybelt Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Me thinks that you hit ye olde nail on the head! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. you took the words right outa my head
and we'll see headlines "investigators meet with congressional staff", "more time needed to complete investigation into....."

Delay/denie/delay/denie.......it's the way the game is played.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
45. *Co Wouldn't Have Allowed This If They Didn't Already Know That.....
some underling is going to take the rap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
47. The SP will indict CIA agents for obstruction of justice per Cheney's orders as payback for Scooter
and that is all he will do. There will be absolutely zero accountability by the White House. I am sure that they didn't pick this guy without making sure that they had something they could hold over his head--like blackmail material or a strong desire for a federal judge appointment.

Dream on, if you are dreaming that this prosecutor is going to do justice. His job is to get revenge for Cheney and to muddy the CIA's name so that the NeoCons can throw doubt upon the Iran NIE.

Congress should proceed with its own investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Bingo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #49
63. I'll see that bingo and
double it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #47
59. why would the cia agents be indicted for obstuction of justice?
the congress can proceed with an investigation at any time but it`s wise to let the first investigation go forward. after the first is concluded the house has more information to decide how to go forward with their investigations and hearings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. Because DeadEye Dick is trying to hang his crimes on CIA.
Nice, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #47
88. You took the words out of my mouth McCamy.
BushCheney has created some powerful enemies at CIA, and they've been getting rather uppity lately. Time for a smack-down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
48. "Outside" not "independent" prosecutor.
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 07:04 PM by sfexpat2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. Good point
Looks like a whitewash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
54. I'd like to feel encouraged, but I don't trust Michael "i don't know if waterboarding is torture"
Mukasey at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaStrega Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
58. *crosses fingers*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
60. Compartmentalization works
99.99% of the CIA can honestly say they know nothing about it. The trick is finding the other 0.01% who do know something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
69. the justice dept is going to investigate itself...and this is a good thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
70. Within five minutes all the bad guys were in maximum security
Well all but one. But that one has probably been dead the entire time he has been on the lam. Whitey knows/knew way too much to ever show up in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
71. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruiner4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
73. oh your back..
yay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
74. So, I heard about this from one of my partners
and I thought he was joking. I'm very confused. I'm also quite a bit saddened that my response to a governmental agent doing his job the way it's supposed to be done is extreme surprise.

Alas, I suffer from grave doubt that this will go anywhere, not because it doesn't have great potential but because I have disappointment fatigue. Fuck, this has been a long seven years, hasn't it? As an aside, I had someone tell me I had sour grapes about Washington because "my side" isn't in the oval office. Yeah, that is so it. :eyes: Time was, I would have blasted him or on a good day, tried to enlighten him. I just said, "Well, that was a short, but stupid conversation." and walked away.

Apparently, I suck at the long view. I liked your discussion about the long view. It makes sense, it just doesn't feel like my heart is in it right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #74
78. Perfect reply.
Short and sweet. Anyone holding that view after all that has gone on for the last seven years isn't worth having any further conversation with, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
75. Is Mulcasey doing this because bush is a lame duck?
Is he another rat jumping ship and looking to the future in order to keep his job with an incoming Democratic White House? That's my guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
76. Linguistics...
He's an "outside investigator" - not a "special investigator". In actuality, he may be an "inside investigator"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave123williams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
79. And it'll only take him a year to get the investigation rolling....

Just long enough for the crooks to get out of town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
80. Wow, perahps we'll see justice in the form of handcuffs vs. impeachment?
I'll take it! And, isn't it 'fitting' that the prosecutor has experience with "the mob?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
82. This is almost as good as another "bipartisan" investigation!
You know, the ones that have been led by Lieberman and Snowe!

Goody! Hurray!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
83. Perhaps this is a thrown bone diversion
with an eventual scape-goat-individual/s which will keep the demanding populace "satisfied" that justice is being served, while the real crimes continue to get shuffled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #83
90. You are hitting it pretty squarely here
And it will be some small fry.

Same ole same ole....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElboRuum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
85. Now...
Replace "John H. Durham" and "Durham" with "Chuck Norris".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
86. They are only investigating the destruction of the tapes, not what was on the tapes
So I'm not holding my breath about anything significant showing up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
89. Good call;
And I predict that Durham will conclude his investigation in exactly 383 days, the day after bush pardons about 100 people complicit in this fiasco; including himself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC