Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wow. I support Edwards, but I have to give Hillary a couple of points for this:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:01 AM
Original message
Wow. I support Edwards, but I have to give Hillary a couple of points for this:
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 01:03 AM by BigBearJohn
And this was on Fox News, no less.

While discussing Obama as being likeable, she also
points out that likeability attracted a lot of votes
for George Bush in 2000. (Wasn't he the guy everybody
wanted to have a beer with back in 2000?)

WHAM. Right to the gut. So, he's likeable. So is George !.
HA! (a la Tweety)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting, Barack's numbers are the only ones to grow in New Hampshire...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, I want my President to be likable.
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 01:17 AM by lapfog_1
Like, oh, say... Bill Clinton. He was pretty likable and very charming. I'd want to hang out and have a beer with him.

But I also want my President to be smart. Like Bill Clinton (Rhodes Scholar) or Hillary or Barak Obama (Harvard Law, summa cum laude) and John Edwards.

Then, after all that, I want my President to stand for something and to be a leader.

Finally, I want my President to show judgment. I think Hillary failed this test. So I don't want Hillary as my President. Nothing to do with race or sex or anything else. If Gore was running, I'd be for him. If Feingold was running, I'd be for him. If Boxer was running, I'd be for her. If Ann Richards was running (and still with us), I'd be for her (and I'd LOVE to have had a beer with Ann!).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. McCains and Hukabees grew too---I just had to tease
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. So the reasoning here is something like:
Everyone who is likeable is as incompetent as George Bush?

Or what? So let's keep nominating unlikeable candidates? So the press will dislike them? So they can lose?

I'm not quite sure I follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The reasoning is, just because a candidate is likeable, it does not necessary follow that they
are qualified to be president. This is was a counter
to the idea that Hillary is unelectable because she
is considered "unlikeable" by some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. No... the trick is to nominate intellectuals who are
Good at hiding it. Prime example: Bill Clinton.

People who are openly intellectual (like Kerry) can't win. The public is biased against them from the start. Intellectuals need to stay in the closet until they are elected, and go for the Big Mac factor on the campaign trail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well, that tears it...
...from now on I'm only voting for thoroughly unlikable bastards.

Giuliani in 2008!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yep, she's right
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 04:45 AM by Naturyl
But she (wisely) avoided identifying the core issue behind all of that, which is anti-intellectualism. That is what the "have a beer factor" is all about. It is an expression of a basic American mistrust of people who are more intelligent than average - a mistrust which has been fed tremendously by the GOP.

It's one more example of how GOP cultural engineering has affected Americans of every political stripe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Beware that likeability thing also gave us Reagan.
Likeability should not be the most important factor in selecting a president.

None of us have to be the damage Reagan did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. And, Obama is a carbon-based bipedal life form. Just like George W. Bush.
Scary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rch35 Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. the horror! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. I agree with her, but I've raised this issue before and got flamed:
Yes, yes, yes, in a perfect world people will elect candidates based on issues and performance, etc.

But we are HUMAN. Every single one of us.

How many of us here are going to vote for someone who may have a record we resonate with yet there is something about them THAT WE SIMPLY DON'T LIKE. A personality quirk, something that rubs us the wrong way.

Granted, I would think we're more apt to like someone BECAUSE we resonate with their issues, but the cult of personality is a huge deal with humankind. And we all like (and dislike) people for different reasons.

People can bitch and moan all they want about it not being about liking someone or not, but it is. And the harder someone tries to be liked by putting on airs or conforming based on who they're talking to, the more disliked they're going to be by those who are sensitive to pandering. I'm not thinking of any candidates in particular with this comment - it's a general statement.

Again, we're not all going to like the same people for the same reasons.
We're not all going to dislike people for the same reasons.

Many here who passionately support a candidate are able to not diss other candidates or their supporters. These are usually the people who can accept that we all like different people for different reasons, and that it is simply a fact of human nature.

The others who constantly state "you're a friggin idiot/robot for liking so and so" seem to be those who don't take human emotional and the "likeability" factor into account. They're pure policy...life is black and white.

How nice it would be to be so clear on everything and see others as idiots for not liking the same person you do. How nice it would be to not have emotions affecting your life and your decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
13. Except W's "likeability" was pure media fabrication. No wit, no charm, nothing
Just a rude, petulant frat boy laughing at his own jokes. Without the power behind him, he'd be beaten & ignored by all cool kids - in any setting, any age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Circa 2000 and the election cycle then, I am not sure
That is true.

Pelosi's daughter spent several months dogging Bush's campaign, including riding in his jet for her video. mSNBC has shown that documentary a few tiumes, usually when Bush's popularity is in freefall.

And in taht video, he comes off as human and likeable.

Not someone any of us here on DU would vote for, but likeable.

I really believe that the man suffered some nervous system disease such as Lyme's disease or worse.

He has gone in seven years from someone who had charm and empathy (at one point the press beats up on the filmmaker, and Bush offers her sympathy, in a very sweet way)
to someone that has been so isolated from other people that his own ego has expanded, imploded and expanded again. And he is no longer capable of putting together half a dozen words in a convincing way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
14. well, she apparently finds his foreign policy "likable".
so not sure that was a hit out of the park.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well I guess she'd know about Bush's likeability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. I never saw Bush as being likeable...
Granted, I would need a beer to tolerate his company. Other than that, this "Bush is likable" thing never made sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC