anybody following the vote count issues in NH? got this from BBV

[ORDagnabbit]

seems like areas that were counted by diebold machines went for clinton and Mccain in higher percentages then areas taht were hand counted.

http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/71200.html?1199902315

UPDATE JAN 9 9am PST: TOWN OF SUTTON CONFIRMS RON PAUL TOTALS WERE 31, NOT ZERO.

I just got off the phone with Jennifer Call, Town Clerk for Sutton. She confirmed that the Ron Paul totals in Sutton were actually 31, and said that they were "left off the tally sheet" and it was human error.

This is not an acceptable answer, especially because one of the most common forms of fraud in a hand count system is to alter or omit results on the reporting sheet. Hand count is lovely, transparent. They then fill out another reconciliation sheet, often in front of witnesses, and it looks fine. Then they provide a summary or media sheet with the incorrect results.



also

[MNDemNY]

1. .

:crazy: :tinfoilhat:

[2rth2pwr]

2. Hand counting of paper ballots is the easiest system to hack. nt

[ORDagnabbit]

3. I know it it frustrates the hell out of me that we havent changed since 2000..

how the hell can we change the country if we cant trust the voting process??

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5530

[Sydnie]

4. ignore BBV

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2639940&mesg_id=2639940