Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blair Switches to auto-Pilate (Pontius Pilate his Hero) in Parliment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 01:28 PM
Original message
Blair Switches to auto-Pilate (Pontius Pilate his Hero) in Parliment
Edited on Thu Feb-22-07 01:43 PM by KoKo01
(C-Span had Blair's appearance yesterday and he was pathetic (Bushlike)...here's a good review of what he said)

Blair switches to auto-Pilate

By Andrew Gimson, Commons sketch
Last Updated: 2:08am GMT 22/02/2007

Like Pontius Pilate, the Prime Minister sometimes feels the need to wash his hands in public. Such an occasion occurred yesterday, when Tony Blair declared himself innocent of the bloodshed in Iraq.

This was an apologia in which Mr Blair sounded very tired, but not very apologetic. Whoever else is to blame, it is not him. At one point he said of the terrorists in Iraq, "We will beat them when we realise it is not our fault that they're doing it,""We don't apologise for our values but stand up for them."

Sir Menzies Campbell, for the Liberal Democrats, retorted that while we "shouldn't apologise for our values", we still have to "take responsibility for our actions".


The same point was made with even greater force by Sir Malcolm Rifkind, a former Tory foreign secretary, who accused the Prime Minister of being "still in denial" and offered the unanswerable observation that al-Qa'eda can only use Iraq as a battlefield "because of the decision he took and President Bush took to invade that country".

Mr Blair repeated: "We didn't cause the terrorism. The terrorists caused the terrorism."

The question that provoked in some of us was: "Didn't you realise the terrorists would cause the terrorism?"

Mr Blair faces a choice between admitting that he was naïve and admitting he took us to war on a false prospectus, and naturally he prefers to avoid giving either answer.

more...good read to finish here.......

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=T3S0VXV3OW5M3QFIQMFCFFOAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/02/22/niraq422.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. I watched him live and was shocked
to hear him state that the coalition is not responsible for the hundreds of thousand dead Iraqis. Delusional is a kind word for these war criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. He continued whining "It's not my fault" this morning in a radio interview
Tony Blair has refused to apologise for the security situation in Iraq, saying he bears no responsibility for it.

The prime minister told BBC Radio 4 that extremists trying to thwart Iraq's democracy were to blame for attacks.

"I don't think we should be apologising at all for what we are doing in Iraq. We're trying to support the democrats against the terrorists," he added.
...
"I don't think we should be apologising because we're not causing the terrorism.

"It's being caused by internal extremists who are linking up with external extremists. And 80-90% of that violence is in or around Baghdad and it's being caused deliberately in order to stop the government of Iraq - which 12 million people voted for - from functioning."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6385137.stm


Link to interview on that page, if you can bear 30 minutes of Blair trying to claim that they had to disband all the Iraqi police and military, but the lack of any replacement police or military who could speak the language or have a cat in hell's chance of getting the populace on their side wasn't his fault at all, oh no sir. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not surprising - distasteful, yes. Outrageous, yes. A lie, most definitely.
But hardly shocking..such a speech was to be expected.

Those that can invade a country for no reason will not have a hard time excusing any other abuse that stems from the original act. Blaming the victim is second-nature to those who think they have the unquestionable right to attack others.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. He even blamed God once
He said he prayed before he made his decision to be bushie's unquestioning poodle and so God was responsible for the consequences.

He is a pathetic and cowardly MFer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC