Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton camp being about as sleazy as it can get, re: "not talking about cocaine."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:15 AM
Original message
Clinton camp being about as sleazy as it can get, re: "not talking about cocaine."
Since yesterday on the talking head programs all I've heard in the media is Clinton supporters acting shocked, SHOCKED I TELL YOU, that people are mentioning Barack Obama's COCAINE use! Can you imagine? They're all sure to point out they sure wouldn't ever mention Barack Obama's COCAINE use, they're just reporting on all the people who ARE talking about Barack Obama's COCAINE use! It's about as low and sleazy a tactic as they can do, imho, attempting to distance themselves from it by repeating over and over and over and over again, then showing the tape in which the words aren't mentioned at all, but pointing out that the dude was obviously referring to Barack Obama's use of COCAINE and MARIJUANA!

They all go, "GASP! Can you imagine someone would say that about Obama?! Horrors...but we'd never stoop so low! We're just reporting on what other people are saying about Barack Obama's COCAINE USE!" Not surprisingly these references are coming fast and furious on, where else, defense contractor GE's NBC and MSNBC media outlets.

I suspect the ultimate goal is NOT to get Hillary elected...or Obama. They're slamming Hillary almost as bad, repeating that she slammed MLK and says it was really LBJ that was responsible for civil rights advancement in America. The point is to sour EVERYONE on both of them. White people, they're hoping, will get the message that Obama is just another gang-bangin' drug user; they know Hillary is already trouble with a huge part of the electorate, and this should help assure that any potential black voters will dislike her, too. And they refuse to mention than John Edwards is even running. Today it was all Obama/Hillary all morning until after everyone had gone to work, then they gave five minutes to the Edwards campaign...during which they asked him about...take a guess.

As I stated yesterday, I wish some lawyer somewhere (maybe Edwards himself once they've managed to completely marginalize him) would file a class action suit on behalf of the American voters forcing General Electric to divest itself of NBC. It is just totally, 100% WRONG to have a major defense contractor also pulling the strings on who gets election coverage. This is THE MOST fucked up race I've ever seen. This morning Scab even mentioned how it was setting up to look like "2000 all over again," with the race close and no one knowing what will happen. Of course it will! That's the goal. Turn off EVERYONE to Clinton and Obama so that when Diebold anoints Mitt Romney they can just say "Oh, well obviously people just couldn't bring themselves to vote for a woman or a black man."

I have a baaaad feeling about this.

(PS to all the "anyone who speaks ill of Hillary is a hater" crowd: I don't hate Hillary Clinton, nor am I an Obama supporter. I've not made a decision yet, though I am close. But please try something more creative than just calling everyone who disagrees with you a "hater." It's juvenile.)

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Baloney.
And cheap baloney at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks for that thoughtful, reasoned response.
You've added so much to the dialog.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Would you be willing to kick in a few bucks
that we're trying to collect so the poster will keep a journal? We could all benefit greatly by reading her previous prose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. What poster?
Not sure what you're talking about.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. WHAAAAAAAA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think it should be talked about.
One coke head in the White House is enough!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beberocks Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Exactly! This is just one reason Obama is unelectable IMO
And I find it very disturbing that this is not being brought up in the MSM. I'll bet very few of the Obama supporters know about his long-term drug use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Long term?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. it`s getting really really bad isn`t it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Calling Obama a coke head and trying to link him to bush;
can you sink any lower? Now you can go whine about how Obama supporters unfairly attack Clinton.

There's a word for that kind of behavior
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I call it like I see it.
And yes I could have chose my words better but because of the bullshit being posted I decided not to. So sue me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Yes, you do.
The trouble is, you're seeing what you've been told to see, without critically thinking, William. To call Obama a "coke head" is inexcusable. He's no more a "coke head" than one is an raging drunk after attending a frat party in college. You're smarter than that, William, even if you DO like Windows Vista.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. To begin with I don't like Windows Vista.
I love it. And as to the second part I'll say it again I can sling shit with the best of them. And you know what I'm talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. self delete
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 11:01 AM by Atman
Responded to wrong person
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. He TRIED Cocaine in his younger days. My bet is...99.9% of Congress and any administration since the
70s has too! Please. A little coke in college is no big deal and if the psycho-in-chief can be an alcoholic and cocaine user....Barack's youthful indiscretions are NO BIG DEAL. If Barack was a coke addict, that would be a different story, but he isn't and never was. The man went on to Harvard Law and became very siccessful. He already owned up to it in his book. He wasn't trying to hide it. HE wrote about it himself. This is a non-issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. If he can't respond now, how's he going to respond when the Repubs...
bring it up, day after day after day? Oh, you don't think they would be that low??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. The parallels between the Clinton 2008 campaign and Bush 2000 are unsettling.
McCain was constantly getting slandered by Rove et al in 2000. If he'd dare to protest, they'd accuse him of being hot tempered, weak, or going back on his promise to run a positive campaign.

Clinton is doing the same thing to Obama, and it is a bit unnerving.

Ten days ago, I was an undecided voter. These tactics by the Clinton clan helped me decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. DING DING DING! Buzz Clik, you're our grand prize winner!
The parallels between the Clinton 2008 campaign and Bush 2000 are unsettling.

I call it "Operation Color Him Black." They're trying to attack his strength, his colorlessness. It's not blatant racism, just associating him with the radicalism of the 60's. They're trying to chase away Obama's white voters by "reminding" him that he's black--and a drug-addicted one, at that.

:headbang:
rocknation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. Some very unsettling similarities, indeed. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. Before I have to hide this thread, I think you're right.
And, it's only January. It's like the goal is to make it as ugly as possible as early as possible or something.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Are you part of the Clinton camp?
You just brought it up. You're talking about the "not talking about cocaine"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Oh, you see right through me.
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 11:09 AM by Atman
:eyes:

Unlike the very general audience General Electric is trying to reach, the audience here is hard-core and I presume to be much better educated about these kind of crapola tactics so that we're able to discuss them and avoid being sucked in by them. Perhaps I give some DUers too much credit?

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nancyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. I tend to agree.
I am already sick of the mud-slinging and general garbage. It will only get worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
20. barack used cocaine?
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 11:11 AM by madrchsod
you are saying that he one of the tens of millions of americans that have used cocaine sometime in their lives?

dam this is a big story...obama was one of tens of millions of americans from ALL walks of life that has used cocaine!

i`m shocked ,i tell you, i`m shocked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. The clintons camp does appear to be running a very republican like campaign to my mind..
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 12:24 PM by cooolandrew
... I can only be more drawn to Barack's huge positivity which in a time of darkness is huge shining light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
24. Good thing links aren't required in General Discussion
.
.
.

But documentation via links might give more credence to the Original Poster's assertions

I'm waiting to see (hopefully) some more responsible posting on this board before your election

As for calling any "camp" sleazy

I ain't impressed

Just My Canuk Humble Observation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. A love people who ask for links to reality!
:rofl:

Do you really think I'm making this up? You haven't heard ANYONE, especially on MSNBC, bring up the Obama/coke? Come on? Who are you trying to kid, are do you simply not pay any attention to the news? And since I specifically mentioned MSNBC and NBC, exactly how difficult would it be for an intelligent person like you to log on to the MSNBC web site? I'm not even sure there is anything there about it, because, as I clearly stated, I was hearing it on GE-owned TELEVISION, not on any web site.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Links to opinion?
How can someone link to something referencing their own personal opinion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. "all I've heard in the media " was the statement before the assertions
.
.
.

I'll admit that our Canadian "media" doesn't pay a whole lot of attention to some of the issues

So I asked for a link or two

I got my answer

sorta/kinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Aaah, I see
Yeah, it's all over the media today. MSNBC has changed their web site so I've got no idea how to track down stories on it anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC