Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What happens if Michigan is allowed to have their delegates restored

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:08 PM
Original message
What happens if Michigan is allowed to have their delegates restored
Does that mean Hillary gets all of Michigan's delegates?

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#MI

I have read that the superdelegates from Michigan might be allowed to have their delegates counted. Does anyone know if the DNC might allow Florida and Michigan's delegates to be included?


... The net effect of the DNC's banning Michigan's 156 delegates from participating in next summer's presidential nomination process will be a penalty that is not enforced:

"I don't think it'll affect much of anything. All of the nominees said they'd seat delegates. We'll have delegates in August. (The exclusion) is not expected to be enforced," DeRoche said, noting it would reflect poorly on the candidates during the presidential election in November if they were not to allow the votes of two states as sizable as Michigan and Florida during the primary process.


Yes, it would be a disaster. Since all the candidates are apparently already on the record for allowing Michigan's delegates to the convention, that makes the Jan 15th contest there much more than a "beauty contest" as there are going to be 156 delegates that are chosen.

If either Obama or Edwards wins both Iowa and New Hampshire, their campaign choosing to skip out of Michigan will be looked back on as the most stupid strategic move of the election. Instead of having the opportunity to put Clinton away, not only will they be letting Clinton claim a win, but we'll also see the contest shift from 'who won' each state to 'who has the most delegates' for the nomination-- very favorable to Clinton.



http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2007/12/michigan-delegate-update.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think the DNC would get sued, and some sort of block would be put up
Didn't they ask Obama & Edwards (and all of them) to sign some sort of agreement to pull out?

BTW - I could be totally wrong here, but I thought that was the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Since uncommitted got more than 15% of the vote
there will be uncommitted delegates elected at our district conventions in March. Of course, at this point we don't know if they'll ever get seated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not If They're Uncomitted
Some Democratic leaders in Michigan encouraged their citizens who didn't want to vote for Hillary to vote for "Uncomitted." If Michigan's delegates are restored, Clinton will not automatically get these delegates. According to CNN, 37% are uncomitted.

Uncomitted means the delegates are not pledges to ANY of the candidates, so anything can happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Like they would split the uncommitteds?
By proportion?

So this still gives Hillary an unfair advantage for having kept her name on the ballot.

I'm so confused. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Not Exactly
Michigan (like Florida) is banking on the DNC backing down and inviting its delegates to the convention. The "uncommitted delegates" could then go for whichever candidate they choose (who is still running). So, assuming no one else drops out, each uncommitted delegate could go for Kucinich, Obama or Edwards (or even Clinton, although there would be little point).

But, the people who want to be delegates have doubtless communicated to people within their party the candidate they are supporting. Uncommitted is just a technicality to get around the DNC rules and fact that candidates pulled out of Michigan. When the state holds its caucuses to select delegates (based on the primary results) there will be no "uncommitted"


At least, that's if I understand it correctly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Thanks for your input
I'm trying to figure out if there is an unfair advantage to Clinton for her having left her name on the ballot. Thanks again. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Pigs will fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. I didn't think that was a possibility. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DurShar Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hillary will have just had a good day.
Todays primary would have been 128 delegates and the 28 superdelegates. The superdelegates are unpledged so they are fair game to everyone.

So my estimate if Michigan gets its delegates back.

Hillary 78 + superdelegates
Uncommitted 50 + superdelegates

Kucinich will get 1 or 2 delegates in the mix somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Sneaky! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. So... she spent NOTHING in the state. Lots of folks stayed away. And she benefits.
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Even after campaigning in the state, Kucinich got 4%
That's way below the 15% threshold for getting delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DurShar Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. The threshold isn't statewide.
He may have squeezed out 15% in any specific congressional district. Kucinich could also get one or more unpledged delegates (superdelegates) who are not bound by any vote count and can support anyone they choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Well, even looking at county-by-county results
Here it doesn't look good. DK got 10% in one county, there's a smattering of 7, 8, or 9 percents... And a bunch of ones and twos, including a few where Chris Dodd outpolled him. That said, I don't know how the counties correspond to the CDs (or however Michigan allocates its delegates), so I suppose it's possible that there might be a delegate in there.

I also don't see what any superdelegates (who by definition are party insiders) would gain by climbing on the Kucinich train.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. My understanding is that if Hillary
locks up a majority of the remaining delegates before Denver the disputed delegates will almost certainly be seated. The only way they wouldn't be seated is if Obama and/or Edwards have a majority of the remaining delegates at the convention AND the disputed delegates would tip the scales back to Hillary. Then you likely wouldn't see them seated.

Whoever controls the majority of the other undisputed delegates at the convention will control the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. Michigan WIll Have Its Super Delegates
While the state may lose its elected delegates, it still will be represented at the Convention by the party aparachniks who comprise the Super Delegates. This includes every Michigan Democratic Congressperson, both Senators, the Governor and party leaders around the state.

Without a real election I can't see a credentials fight at the Convention of delegates not being seated as I didn't see any delegate being elected last night. Maybe a Michigander can set us straight.

Cheers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC