I agree with the "pundits" tonight who say the reason Obama and Clinton called a truce was...

[NNN0LHI]

...they have concluded that a Dem will without a doubt win next November just as long as they don't screw it up for us all. So they had better back off and just keep rolling right into the White House.

Don

[Mz Pip]

1. Well I have to admit

all that divisiveness wasn't doing us any good. I'd hate to see the Repubs be able to sit back and let us self destruct without forking over millions of dollars to assist in the process. We shouldn't make it easy for them. Just sayin.

All doing well. One of those 3 will be sworn in on Jan 20, 2009. I will be happy no matter which one it is. :party:

Mz Pip
:dem:

[ursi]

2. plus, they would have made Edwards shine as he wasn't involved

[Whisp]

3. maybe it's not a true truce.

perhaps they just conspired the soap opera crowd to be distracted by low brow shiny things and being able to avoid big issues in the ridiculous fracas.

they win, we lose.

[Horse with no Name]

4. And heaven forbid we find out that either one of them harbors

racist/sexist views. I also find it odd that the pundits let them off that easily. This whole thing makes me uneasy.