Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Virginia Lawmaker Seeks to Ban Replica Testicles on Trailer Hitches

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:44 AM
Original message
Virginia Lawmaker Seeks to Ban Replica Testicles on Trailer Hitches


RICHMOND, Va. — It's one thing to dangle fuzzy dice from a rear view mirror, but decorating a trailer hitch with a large pair of rubber testicles might be a bit much in Virginia.

State Del. Lionel Spruill introduced a bill Tuesday to ban displaying replicas of human genitalia on vehicles, calling it a safety issue because it could distract other drivers.

Under his measure, displaying the ornamentation on a motor vehicle would be a misdemeanor punishable by a maximum fine of $250.

He said the idea came from a constituent whose young daughter spotted an example of the trail hitch adornment and asked her father to explain it.

"'I didn't know what to tell her,"' Spruill said the constituent told him before Spruill vowed to stop such displays.

"I said, 'Sir, I'm going to be a laughingstock, but I'm going to do it,"' he said.

The Virginia General Assembly has some experience with offbeat bills. Three years ago, it drew widespread attention with an unsuccessful effort to outlaw baggy pants worn so low they expose underwear.

Spruill, 61, said the indignity of the "droopy drawers" debate wouldn't deter him. He said he won't hesitate to bring a set of $24.95 trailer testicles with him for a legislative show-and-tell.

"I'm going to do it," Spruill told a handful of reporters after Tuesday's House session adjourned. "I'm going to bring them out here and show them to you till they tell me to stop."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't these people have more important things to do???
Yeesh :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Yes they have
But things like budget deficits, and repealing the abusive driver fees, take a back seat when it comes to a pair of rubber balls!:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
24. You're referring of course to the bone-heads
You're referring of course to the bone-heads who waste time purchasing and decorating their vehicles with this crap, yes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well isn't that sexy?
I don't know.. freedom of speech is big - but man that thing is disgusting to look at!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angela Shelley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. There are roughly 3 billion of them on the planet
at the moment, so you might want to get used to seeing them as a decorative item on a vehicle.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. I guess I don't know why it isn't covered by some existing law.
Can you display nude photos - or even drawings - on the side of your car?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
43. there are plenty of naked lady mudflaps
out there, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. I don't know if silhouettes are naked or not.
Do you?

Would a more equivalent display be accepted? A representation of breasts with nipples? Or a dildo?

I don't have an answer or even a stake in the matter - but I do think consistency in law is important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. of course
I would say the implication is clear, would you not? I mean they are actually called "naked lady mudflaps"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Implication is one thing, naked another.
And again, I'm not advocating that either or both should o shouldn't be permitted.

I'm trying to find some existing legal basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. A Law Against Artistic-Sociological Statements?
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 10:52 AM by Crisco
Isn't compensation what these vehicles are all about?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Yup.. they have to display fake ones, because guys driving these
Gas mongers don't really have 'em in their pants.

"Hey, Look at me.. Look at my junk".. let's go beat up a couple of guys at the bowling alley, grab a case of beer and troll for chicks.

Rediculous? Yes.. should it be illegal? No. I like to be able to spot these kinds of idiots a few blocks away, because most tote gun racks as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. There is always one of these posts isn't there? Freud went passe years ago.
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 11:05 AM by Mountainman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. Fantastic.. because i'm frankly a bit to young to know much about Frued anyway..
But I do know about Testostorone Crazed Guys driving around with nuts hanging from their bumpers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. saggy baggy balls...yeah, that's macho lololol
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 10:50 AM by Solly Mack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. BAN MORE THINGS!
Sure they're stupid, but it's so much easier when the dumbasses of the world advertise who they are.

And of course it's my state that's once again leading the charge to legislate more stupid shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VenusRising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. I guess Ford stands for
Full of redneck DNA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBorders Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. He should have told his daughter
"It's a sign put on there by the owner to tell the rest of the world that he's an idiot." That's what I would tell my daughter. Seriously. No need to ban it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. It's a boy truck.
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 11:03 AM by Wizard777
If he can't explain to his daughter where trucks come from. He doesn't have a shot in hell of explaining where babies come from.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
12. I guess they have no unneutered animals in VA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. They can get around the law by making a mold of a bull's scrotum.
The bill would only ban "human" genitalia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. I am NOT prudish....much to the contrary.....having said that....
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 10:57 AM by OwnedByFerrets
I cannot stand that shit on the back of vehicles. And I would HATE to have to explain to my 8 yr old daughter what those are and why they are hanging off the back of that rednecks truck.

On edit: I am guessing that a rubber vagina on the back of a truck would NOT be allowed. There would be a huge public outrage. But just a guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBorders Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. I agree with you. But banning them?
I would just as soon let the idiots keep them for the sake of keeping free speech intact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
52. I do understand. I really do. And I am so torn between
the free speech thing and seeing those things on the back of pick up trucks.
I guess I would just shrug it off and try to say something snarky.
After some serious thought about this, I will reluctantly say that we dont need any new laws saying what we can and cannot do. I suppose rednecks will be with us forever.....I wonder why we dont see any rednecks in the Star Trek episodes.B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBorders Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. As a father, I understand your dilemna
I don't know how I would explain it to my daughter, who is now only 4. But I would tend to fall on the side of having to explain it to my daughter than ban them.

On another note, it's not just rednecks -- I've seen 'gangbanger' types with 'em too. I guess any culture where an uber-macho image is held in high esteem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
29. Hahaha.. "Mommy why is that lopsided doughnut hanging off that lady's truck" NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. But I'll bet he wouldn't get very far trying to ban these...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. we need more stupid laws!!! Land of the free, I dont think so. Bad taste is not a crime
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
16. ...
"State Del. Lionel Spruill introduced a
bill Tuesday to ban displaying replicas
of human genitalia on vehicles"

Officer, they are not human testicles...
they're bull balls.
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
17. Hey ...how about a dildo for a hood ornament?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
20. I remember a political cartoon from years ago
The title of it was, "What I Did This Year."

One panel showed a Chinese man in leg irons with a writing pad. What he had written was, "I stood before a tank." (Tiannamen Square in China)
The second panel was a fat congressman sitting behind a really nice desk. What he wad written was, "I tried to outlaw flag burning and debated whether urine was a viable artistic medium. Send money."

There are no more great statesmen - it's all about grabbing money for your district and trying to ban things that personally bug you.

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
22. Whoever was the model for those was clearly in his early fifties
the age when a mans nuts want to start hanging out with his knees
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
23. Oh the horror, oh the Hughmanity!1!

THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!111

I'm series!1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemunkee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
26. ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
27. I am no prude, but I think they are pretty disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
30. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. I just love reading RW memes on DU -- the "Clinton is a man" stuff is SEXIST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. And I love how everyone can take a joke.. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Why should misogyny and RW talking points be acceptable on a progressive message board?
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 11:57 AM by LostinVA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Well for one.. I think we ALL rally around "Freedom of Speech"..
But the real reason this even bothers you is because I have an Obama tag next to my name. If I was waiving a Clinton flag.. then this would all be fine.

As I stated a couple of times now - I was joking. And i'm hardly the first DEM to imply that Hillary has a big set of balls. In fact, most of us view that as a compliment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Actually, you are way off base and very wrong about Lost
It has nothing to do with your Obama tag...but what is misogynist.
This is a progressive board and if you stick around long enough...you will find that very few Democrats here find that sexist humor a "compliment".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
31. $24.95, no less. Not cheap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
32. Only REAL testicles will be allowed...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
33. Often, security is used as a reason to take away freedom.
As far as I'm concerned, it's a 1st Amendment issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. But not in this case...
If you read the VA assembly members quote, this fell into the other reason to take away freedom: 'Do it for the children'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
38. First they came for the rubber testicle displayers
But I did not speak up, because I did not display rubber testicles...

Then they came for the fuzzy dice hangers, but I did not speak up, for I hung no fuzzy dice...

Then they came for the Volvo drivers... but there was no one left to speak for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdesOfOctober Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #38
47. Don't worry.
Hillary will save you in the nick of time. She's found her voice.

Ides
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
40. It's a quick and easy way to identify stupid idiots on the road. nt
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 01:36 PM by MookieWilson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
41. I'm still curious why my post yesterday about this pending legislation
was locked.
I guess discussing legislation is now considered verboten.:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #41
53. I blame me for that...
I stood my ground and voiced my feelings, and was told I was in need of mental health help:)

When one set of civil rights bangs heads with another, I think it's a serious issue. It's like the sex in the restroom deal... restrooms are for elimination of urine and fecal matter, not sex. I expect some privacy when I use a public restroom, I don't want to hear someone going at it in the next stall, or a row of stalls down. What happens to my rights?

What about the rights of men who have had their own testicles removed due to cancer or something? What about young kids, or someone who has been recently raped and not ready to deal with genitalia of any kind? What happens to their rights?

I'm no prude. I've been known to hang with some damn rough crowds... just saying...




Tough crowd... no prudes here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
44. mandatory carstration
Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #44
54. Good one, actually:)
Nut behind the wheel vs nut hanging from his bumper...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
45. Just think about how long it takes 3 million rubber testicles to decompose
At least Tupperware has a practical function.

And the next time someone talks about plastic on diapers, I'll refer them to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
48. It takes balls to ban testicles.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
51. Buy stock in the company that makes them
Those idiots in Virginia are doing more to market them than a Super Bowl campaign ever could.

I saw my first pair over the weekend. Now I'll expect to see them everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
55. I may not agree with your rubber testicles, but I shall defend to the death your
right to swing them....:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCappedBandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
56. Virginia.,.
why am I not surprised
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC