Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Losing Email Destruction Battle

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:28 AM
Original message
White House Losing Email Destruction Battle
White House Study Found 473 Days of E-Mail Gone

By Dan Eggen and Elizabeth Williamson
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, January 18, 2008; Page A01

The White House possesses no archived e-mail messages for many of its component offices, including the Executive Office of the President and the Office of the Vice President, for hundreds of days between 2003 and 2005, according to the summary of an internal White House study that was disclosed yesterday by a congressional Democrat.

The 2005 study -- whose credibility the White House attacked this week -- identified 473 separate days in which no electronic messages were stored for one or more White House offices, said House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.).

Waxman said he decided to release the summary after White House spokesman Tony Fratto said yesterday that there is "no evidence" that any White House e-mails from those years are missing. Fratto's assertion "seems to be an unsubstantiated statement that has no relation to the facts they have shared with us," Waxman said.

The competing claims were the latest salvos in an escalating dispute over whether the Bush administration has complied with long-standing statutory requirements to preserve official White House records -- including those reflecting potentially sensitive policy discussions -- for history and in case of any future legal demands.

Waxman said he is seeking testimony on the issue at a hearing next month from White House counsel Fred F. Fielding, National Archivist Allen Weinstein and Alan R. Swendiman, the politically appointed director of the Office of Administration, which produced the 2005 study at issue.

more...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/17/AR2008011703575.html?wpisrc=_rsspolitics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. "the dog eat my homework"?
i thought the "adults" were in charge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. What if it should turn out
that some IT person who obeys the law made a set of back-ups? Or that there was some automated back-up program?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think if they wanted to locate those e-mails, they could. Too bad
I have such total contempt for this admin, but they've earned it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It just seems to me
Edited on Sat Jan-19-08 12:12 PM by Turbineguy
that the system would be designed to keep the records and that there would be several redundancies. An accidental erasure would have a near zero probablility and a deliberate erasure would require extraordinary measures and by a number of persons at different levels.

It is the nature of governments to keep records. They may take time to find but they are there. The record keeping is placed outside the control of political persons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nixon's 18-minute tape gap
was NOTHING compared to 473 days of deliberate erasures of email!

I remember what a big deal was made about that 18-minute erasure during the investigation of the Watergate tapes. That pales by comparison to what the current Misadministration is doing.

I hope Pelosi and Reed manage to put some muscle into the investigation of these missing emails, but somehow I just don't have much hope. This destruction of evidence -- which BushCo was specifically told not to destroy, demonstrates once again the misguided idea of the "Imperial Executive" who answers to nobody, even Congress.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. Can we waterboard them for their hard drives?
I'm sure the CIA can find those archives for the white house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bullshit
They will all stay in office and if anyone sees the inside of a jail, it will be some low level underling. I call that winning, not losing, but that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why doesn't Waxman crawl back under the rock he lived under ?
Fuck that traitor.

Sibel Edmounds was promised hearings by Waxman...but now he refuses to do so.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Fred Fielding. This is just surreal.
That guy was John Dean's deputy during the Watergate scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC