Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen Clinton Announces Millions of Dollars for Defense Projects to Benefit NY

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:53 AM
Original message
Sen Clinton Announces Millions of Dollars for Defense Projects to Benefit NY
Senator Clinton Announces Millions of Dollars for Defense Projects to Benefit New York

Funding for New York in the FY 2007 Department of Defense (DOD) Authorization bill includes:

* $2.5 million for Benet Labs’ Rarefaction Wave Gun
* $12.4 million for Lightweight 155-mm Towed Howitzer which has its cannon assembly manufactured at Watervliet Arsenal
* $1.5 million for Source Sentinel – Detection of Biological Agents in Water
* $1.5 million for Rome-ITT – Masint Warfighter Tools
* $5 million for Lockheed Martin Radar Systems- AN/TPS-59 Low Earth Orbit Satellite (LEOS) Tracking
* $6.6 million in Military Construction funding for NEADS Support Facility’s Phase II construction
* $21.9 million in Military Construction funding from the President’s Budget for Camp Smith Readiness Center
* $1.8 million in Military Construction funding from the President’s Budget for Stewart – USMCR Aviation Support Equipment Shop
* $3 million in Defense and Military Construction funding for ATK Alliant Techsystems’ Scramjet Research
* $3 million for Portal Dynamics’ Aviation/Missile Life Cycle Management Command Integrated Digital Environment Pilot Program at Fort Drum
* $248 million in Military Construction funding from the President’s Budget for Fort Drum
* $9.7 million in funding from the President’s Budget for the ANG Queensbury Readiness Center
* $3 million for General Motors’ Next Generation Non-Tactical Vehicle Propulsion Project
* $3.6 million for Icuiti’s Wearable Hyperspectral Imaging System
* $8 million for RIT’s Defense Sustainment and Modernization Initiative
* $3 million for SUNY Binghamton – Advanced Microelectronics Manufacturing Center
* $28 million for one additional MH -60R Helicopter – Lockheed Martin Owego is prime contractor on the common cockpit for the MH-60R
* $112 million for eight additional MH-60S Helicopters – Lockheed Martin Owego is prime contractor on the common cockpit for the MH-60S
* $682 million from the President’s Budget for Lockheed Martin Owego’s VH 71A Project
* $5.2 million in federal funds for Carwell Products' Army Corrosion Prevention and Control program and $5 million for their Marine Corps Corrosion Prevention and Control program
* $3.5 million for CUBRC – Lens X Hypervelocity Ground Testing
* $7.8 million in Military Construction funding retained from the President’s Budget for the Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station

May 6, 2006

http://clinton.senate.gov/features/defense/index.cfm

$2.5 million for Benet Labs’ Rarefaction Wave Gun

Rarefaction Wave Gun

If engineers could figure out how to uncork the breech and feed the gases from the gun chamber through a rocket nozzle after the
bullet had begun its motion down the barrel what would happen? Because of the key role of the rarefaction wave, this kind of gun has
been named the RArefaction waVE guN or RAVEN. It was patented in October 2002 and assigned to the U.S. Army. No other known
technologies reduce barrel heating by 40 percent. This was experimentally demonstrated, and is the direct consequence of getting the
hot propellant gases out of the barrel before the bullet has even left the muzzle. This would enable a 70 percent increase in the
sustained fire rate and a 70 percent increase in the number of burst-fire shots. Reduction of recoil momentum by 61 percent exceeds
that achievable by a muzzle brake. Since recoil stroke is proportional to the square of momentum, this would allow an 85 percent
reduction in recoil stroke of the cannon.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. A candidate for the military industrial complex.
Hillary claims to be for change because every poll says voters want change. I can't believe anyone falls for it. If the polls said voters wanted ice cream she'd be the ice cream candidate this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. No more Clintons, No more Bushes. No more taking it in our tushes!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Are you 12?
A senator brings government contracts (JOBS) to her state. And you're all nutso? Didn't Obama manage to get anything for Illinois? Because that would mean he was ineffectual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Yay! Let's bomb brown people for jobs in New York!
I'll admit, it's better than when the genocide of random Arabs and Persians only benefits Texas.

What is one to say to this kind of selective blindness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Clinton also ought to fund NYC's answer to the FBI, CIA and NSA

just sayin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wonder who will get the no bid contracts? Place your bets folks,
I'm wagering on halliburton....by then it will be too late for those who are getting sucked into hill-a-mania.

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I wouldn't bet against that (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Seems like no one else is betting against it either....where are
all the hrc supporters in this thread? Guess the truth is too hard to handle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Why change the connections?
Halliburton is a good bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Scary, huh? The fix is in and it won't be fixing this country. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bright Eyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. YAY! WAR!
She's got my vote!:nuke:

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Funny. I thought she claims to be running as a "peace" candidate.
Or, maybe she meant to say the "Peace Through Strength" candidate. Oh, wait, that's been used by another "peace" candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC