Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

As of today, I am worried if Hillary wins....we will lose in November.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:29 PM
Original message
As of today, I am worried if Hillary wins....we will lose in November.
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 01:49 PM by Roxy66
"The one person that can unite the Republican party is Hillary"...as stated this morning on MTP. I am a big supporter of a woman Pres, and was thrilled when Hillary won in NH, and slapped the pundits (Tweety) in the face....but I think if she is our nominee...we will lose. They will unite...the pundits will hammer her for 10 months...and we will have another Repug Pres. I hate it!! But I think this will be the case. If she is the nominee...I will vote for her, but the odds are against her and us if she is.

I need to add..... I really like Hillary. I am just looking down the road to the Election, and looking at the history of the MSN coverage.... They love to bash her, and I think we will be in trouble by September. I'm less worried about the Republicans making the case against her...than the snarky Pundits trying to give entertainment to this most important time in our Country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm worried with any of our candidates all though I like them all ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
115. You're right...it's part of the R plan..
it's all a setup..the repubs wanted Hillary to be the nominee because the Rove machine is working in the background..who they're really afraid of is John Edwards because he's going to kick their butt right to the clink..and the media knows it too, that's why they're trying to keep him off the news as much as possible thus, in an attempt, for the people to think he's not even in the race, and it's apparently working...we've got to get the message to the people what is actually taking place again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. IF she wins we have another repug pres. Remember NAFTA and the end of welfare
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 01:37 PM by Vincardog
brought to you under the democratic leadership of Big Bill.
Who refused to investigate and incarcerate the powers behind Iran/Contra and the BCCI scandal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Scary. :( nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. You voted for Nader in 2000 didn't you?
I heard exactly the same argument then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. No I voted for Gore. I also went to NM and worked GOTV for 2 weeks before the election. What did
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 01:57 PM by Vincardog
you do for the cause Kreskin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Well, I didn't go smearing Democrats with ridiculous assertions
But why did you vote for Kerry when Gore was our candidate in 2000?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Clinton did not lobby for and push NAFTA? He didn't cut back radically on WELFARE?
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 01:59 PM by Vincardog
What ridiculous assertion are you referring to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. LeftCoast...was that a question for me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. No
I was addressing the individual who sees no difference between a Democrat and a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #24
27.  Do you see any difference between "Corporate "Centrists'" and Progressive Populists causes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
34. Oh right.
I guess for Obama it would be a walk in the park.
It's either Hillary or Obama and neither one is a traditional presidential candidate.
I don't see as to why Hillary would have less of a chance than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
49. And what about Dennis? Why is the choice between HRC and BHO?
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 04:31 PM by Vincardog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #49
76. Have you seen his primary results?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. I think Hillary has learned from her mistakes-and Bill's
I don't think Obama even knows what the mistakes are. His praise for Reagan and the Republicans got him votes in rural Nevada, but what does that say about how he would govern?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sb5697 Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #35
90. u think! you're not paying attention then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #35
119. He didn't praise Reagan. He said he changed things -
that doesn't mean the change was for the better. But he's correct; it was a big change. One that unfortunately brought us the Bushes.

And I don't think the people who absolutely will not vote for H. Clinton under any circumstances will be looking at whether she's learned from mistakes. I think there's this reservoir of resistance toward her and it's just going to make it incredibly difficult for her to win.

I imagine she'd be a better president than candidate, actually. Especially if she can keep Bill in his place, which might be tough.

But I absolutely think she'd have a hard time winning -- a harder time than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
58. XXX-actly!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
77. corporate media consolidation
no action on health care or most Democratic issues. If Hillary is nominated we have lose-lose election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
108. Another Dem hater pisses on DU and our candidates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #108
117. The guy with the UAW sticker calls me a Dem hater for remembering NAFTA Your name says it all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #117
125. Another red x blah blah blah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #125
128. Do you have a point or are you just DainBramaged? What UAW member like NAFTA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. ANYTHING stated on MTP by gluteal jaw jackers is suspect and hardly cause for
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 01:35 PM by BleedingHeartPatriot
fear.

The MSM is desperately trying to figure out which of our candidates will be the Democratic GE candidate, and they're throwing whatever sticks at each of them. Today it was the old meme about HRC uniting the R's, which has not been at all evident in the anemic voter turnout for the R's, so far.

Take a breath, otherwise you're going to spend the next 10 months perpetually breathing into a paper bag. :toast: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm worried that this place will lose the Hill bashers once she's nominated.
NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
38. So,
:spray:


MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. PLUS - the Bloomberg possibility
I think he will jump in if she gets it -- but not if Obama succeeds. He wouldn't mind squelching her(and Bill), especially if Rudy wins the Rep. side, but he would not want to be the spoiler against the first African-American candidate.

This is based on speculation by pundits (Andrea Mitchell primarily)and the fact he and Obama had a very visible lunch.
If McPain is the Rep., he may stay out.

I don't know why the Clintons bother him so much, but apparently there is no love lost.

If he enters - another factor against the Dems winning as he siphons off the Anyone But Hillary votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. It depends on whom she's running against.
She will beat most of the Republican candidates, but I think she could lose to McCain. I hope he doesn't get the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hate to disagree. They will go after Obama and all the new drama
he brings with the Rezko/Corruption stuff. He will not fair well when the R's get a hold of him. Safer with the already vetted Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libby2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm worried too.
I like Hilllary and I think she would make a wonderful President, but I can't deny, I'm worried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. that's the Repig plan (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. I do not believe she will energize or unite republicans but if she does, so what?
There are more Dems than repubs and we are very very motivated this time around. Turnout will be very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
60. There may be more Dems
But not all will vote for her. Same thing goes for the Independents. I am an Independent and I will not vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. IMHO Hillary is least electable of the top 3 Dems. Edwards is Most Electable. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I agree... but Edwards is completely ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. I agree - MTP excuse was Edwards doesn't poll well - but the Bash Hillary MTP was to be expected
Timmy does what his masters want (remember for the good of the country Gore should not challenge Bush in Florida election vote - said after his 3 am walk in the park with Jack Welsh, the CEO of GE - - but we find in any statewide recount Gore would have won Florida - the USSC chose the pres 5 to 4).

When Timmy Russert says something, or a panel he has set up answers a question he has written, I reach for the salt shaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #15
106. anyone who tells the truth is being ignored.
plus do you think they are messing around with the votes also. this caucus in Nevada did the results sound clean to you? 4% for Edwards, something is definitely going on. Or do I have this on:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
126. If Edwards drops out, what do you think would happen if he
throws his support to Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. As an Edwards supporter, I believe HRC can win if she wins
the nomination and everyone gets busy working to make her win.

If it is more fun to bash and attempt to discredit her, the GOP
win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. I really like Hillary.... not trying to bash. Just looking down the road
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. HRC will stand up to the republicans. she has what it takes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBorders Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
129. That has nothing to do with it.
It's the what voters think of her. She can 'stand up' to repugs all she wants. But people already have an opinion of her, and will vote accordingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. That is exactly what the repukes want you to think.
They have already investigated every nook and cranny of the Clinton's lives and got nowhere by doing so. There's nothing they can do to Hillary that they haven't already tried to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. they don't need to investigate, they just need to fan the hate. A large number of Repubs HATE
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 02:06 PM by peacebird
anything Clinton.

She will energize the evangelicals and a large number of the repub base to hit the polls just to vote against her.

And frankly I cannot see HRC bringing the country together, or standing up for the average American. Her health Insurance plan is a perfect example. Talk about a boon for the insurance industry. Why not a health CARE policy instead?

She owes too much to big industry in this country now, and Murdoch. Do you really think she will govern as a progressive? Or will she continue as a "centrist" which is basically a moderate republican.

I do not trust someone who is incapable of admitting they were wrong, and is unable to take responsibility for their actions. "If I knew then what I know now..."
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. I too hate Hillary's IWR vote and her inability to apologize for it. It Pisses me off. I also think
that if the repukes try to continue the old Clinton fight, they will completely finish off the party. Bill Clinton left office with a 65% approval rating. WHY? It was because the people were sick to death of the CRAP the repukes were throwing at the Clintons. Hillary then went on to win a Senate seat in NY. I don't think Hillary is hated as much as some people like to think she is and by the crowds Bill pulls...he is far from hated by SANE people.

As for Hillary's Health Insurance/Care plan....perhaps we, the people, can encourage her to change it? Maybe she will tweak it once in office. If we own the House and Senate, we can pretty much pass anything we want to pass! Congress will have input on that also, no? I don't know about you, but having a choice between Hillary Clinton and any of the repuke nominees...I would choose Hill in a heartbeat. I hate her IWR vote. I detest her Kyl/Lieberman vote. I hate her relationship with the scumbag Murdoch, but with all that being said...she's still better than any repuke candidate. This country cannot afford another repuke administration. That's all there is to it. This is do or die time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sb5697 Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
87. They don't have to do anything. The independents won't vote
for her as evidenced in the primaries--that's fact. She can't win without them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. Why else would the right want her to win??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
23. negative thinking is 100% positive
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brazos121200 Donating Member (626 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
26. If Hillary is the nominee it will be an interesting election.
She has the Clinton machine in back of her and the Democratic establishment likes her, in fact they ( the Clinton establishment)ARE the Democratic establishment. In a long campaign she will probably fare better than either Obama or Edwards. Obama will be hit with every right wing racist scare tactic you can imagine, and some you can't. Edwards is a wonderful person but couldn't carry his home state back in 04. I think Hillary will have an easy time if McCain is the repub nominee. He lacks the killer instinct that Bush and Rove had and I think he would run a lackluster campaign, similar to Dole's back in 96. She could always try one of her "tearing up" routines if McCain starts to pull out front like she did with Obama in NH. With a fighting running mate, such as Jim Webb or Gen Clark, I think the Democrats will put up a formidable challenge to the repubs this year, and the upcoming recession can't hurt, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. I hope your analogy is right... thanks for the positive vibes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. Every white, Republican, male attack on her will work in her favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #28
42. LOL.
I do believe that's the secret sauce. :toast: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clinton Crusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. The Dems need to use this photo E-V-E-R-Y-W-H-E-R-E
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. That pic always creeps me out...ugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
70. Me too
That pic reminds me why McCain's talk is about as straight as a wet spaghetti noodle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. GREAT IDEA!
:toast:

MKJ

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clinton Crusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. McCain looks positively orgasmic for Gods sake....eek factor high
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. that and infantile. Double creepy combination.
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clinton Crusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. and this is the guy who RUINED him in SC in 2000!
What a spineless character McCain is! How quickly he forgot and forgave what was done to him in SC!

What I don't get about all this "McCain would beat Hillary in a landslide" thinking is the country is totally against the war, but McCain is gung ho FOR the war. But then again the war doesn't come up much these days, does it?

In any case, McCain has a high creepy factor, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #31
109. ugh, what a disgusting picture, McCain is crazy hugging *
after what * said about him in 2000. Disgusting. McCain what a kiss-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
122. Keep Kissing, Maverick!!
How does Bewsh's shoulder smell?

Sadly, Dumberica would vote for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
36. Not me
Based on primary turnout alone - the Republicans simply do not have the numbers to compete this time around. They are dead and dying. The Democratic nominee will be the next POTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Generic Brad, I think you are right but I also don't underestimate
the ability of people to unite against a common enemy. I think that is what some people are worried about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
45. That is because you have bought the Repig line of bullshit
Shame.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
46. Stale memes never die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Nope. They just stink more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stravu9 Donating Member (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
48. I Think we WILL lose unless Edwards is the nominee...
I think the corporate media knows this and is setting it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
50. im not
but i am worried about the corporate strangle hold that tightens every year on our government, regardless of who is elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
51. Your fears are justified. She is the LEAST likely to secure a comfortable election margin.
Millions will turn out just to vote against her and maybe half of that amount will be Dems refusing to show up at the polls for her (including me).

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
52. If most republicans are like my bosses your right
they think she is evil and her and bill have killed people to be in office. They are smart people, used to work in DC and have owned many large businesses. Scarey what is out there about her...one of the reasons I want someone else...anyone else. Too much hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
53. Not only Hillary, Obama too will spell doom to the democratic party
in November! Mark my fucking words. I won't vote for either one and I'm life long democrat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sb5697 Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #53
84. Need a white male eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #84
91. Not really. I just want a real democrat, not one who praises Reagan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sb5697 Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #91
92. I've seen excerpts where all 3 of these candidates said
something positive about Reagan. Now what? Does honesty count for anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #92
93. I know Hillary has, you like to point out where Edwards said Reagan was a postive force,
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 10:42 PM by B Calm
or do you just want to hit and run?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sb5697 Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #93
95. I won't hit and run but it will but I will book mark this and get back to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #53
96. Dem huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #53
98. so, who would you vote for?
nobody??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CANDO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
54. Republicans absolutely thrive when they have an enemy to go after.
Doesn't make it fair, but that's what they do best. I'm hearing the "Obama is a Muslim" crap already at work. It's really sickening to watch them go after our candidates while ignoring the sorry bunch of morons in their own primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #54
97. My Dad is a lifelong Dem...and loves Edwards, but he is a "Southern" Dem...
He has inbedded racial tendencies. He gets these weird e-mails from some of his right wing brothers and friends...he forwards them to me all the time without even reading them. I have asked him to stop, but I think he forgets after a while and just sends them off. Anyway, he forwarded one to me the other day and it was that e-mail that is being circulated about Obama being a Muslim....lets just say I freaked out and shot an e-mail back telling him it is a crock and not to believe some of that crap he recieves....he e-mailed me back saying it could be true..and how do I know whether or not he is a Muslim.....that scared the shit out of me. If my Dad...and he HATES Republicans...could fall for it, lots of others will too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
55. Two words: Women's vote...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. Not all women like her
I, for one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. Of course, that's true
But this will be a momentous event for women, and I believe they will rise to the occasion (in general).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. What makes you think some women will only vote for her
because she is a woman?

I'd love for a woman to be president, Barbara Boxer for sure, but not Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. They do have to like her first
I think it will generate quite a lot of excitement, when it becomes clearer what is at hand for the advancement of women. I think this will span generations, but will be especially prominent among younger women. Very exciting, I think.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #66
73. What advancement of women?
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 06:39 PM by Pastiche423
Having a woman as president does what for the advancement? I know no Dem women that are warmongers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #66
80. I think it'd be terrible for women, personally.
If our first female president is just another corporate lackey with different genitalia, it's going to be more depressing than inspiring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #64
110. Barbara Boxer would be great she's a fighter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #110
121. That she is!
I am on her email list and she is plowing ahead w/great work, such as Climate Change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #61
120. She's not my preference either
Women are most definitely NOT a monolithic voting bloc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
56. Interestingly enough, there are folks here who fear if Obama wins, or if Edwards wins...
that the gen election will go to the GOP.

The reality - is the public is more aligned with the democratic candidates (turnout between dem primaries/caucuses and gops have been very lopsided dem) ... BUT that regardless of who the candidate is there WILL be vicious swiftboating and Gore-ing from the rw echochamber. IMO no candidate gets it worse or less than the other candidates. The key will be the response - and the growing savvy of the public to the gimmicks of the GOP.

I find the SC outcomes very comforting in that the very sliming that has worked there before was on high gear (by groups supporting Huckabee) and this time - the effect was nowhere as near as in the past. Basically, more of the voting public - esp those leaning GOP enough to vote in the GOP primary - are becoming cynical and impervious to the types of sliming and smearing that is inevitable from the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
57. the MSM will come around, they're as tired of repukes as we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. Step AWAY from the crack pipe.
That's just the silliest damn statement I've seen all day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sb5697 Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #59
89. Funny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #57
69. !!!
:rofl:

My sides hurt...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
63. We lose even if she wins.
The creeping fascism just goes more stealthy - anyone who suggests she has the right to choose her own (illegally-gained by the criminals she'd replace) powers is not fit to be president.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
65. TRUE STORY.
So I'm in a SALES MEETING last Monday. About 30 Sales Reps, getting our weekly
"briefing". A couple of the new reps start complaining about the economy....
(we experienced reps refer to the economy as the "e-word", because we have
LEARNED NOT TO MENTION it in meetings, as management does not construe the
"E-word" as an excuse for missing quotas :crazy:)

...anyway, our CANVASS MANAGER wants to put a stop to this little uprising.
He gets up and says, and I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP...

"Well, if Hillary Clinton gets in the economy is going right down the tube,
and what will you do then? Everything will just get WORSE.
You just have to keep selling, this may be the EASIEST TIME!"

This, from a guy who has been outwardly NON-POLITICAL in the 5 years I've
worked with him. He said this OUT LOUD, to a ROOM FULL of people.

If I wasn't a KNOWN agitator, I would not have stood up next and said:
"To your first point, Al, I think we can ALL AGREE that one thing
worse than a Clinton win would be FOUR MORE YEARS UNDER REPUBLICAN RULE,
ANY Republican!"

This was met with whoops and claps from around 1/4 of the reps, mostly my
friends and not a few of the African American reps that had been FLABBERGASTED
at the "bosses" little speech. (They are Obama fans).

I don't think Hillary can win in the general election.
I think she's the only candidate, besides Kucinich, who CAN'T win the general.

People HATE her.

I don't like her, and I'm now in a position where I have to defend her, and
believe me, it's TEPID.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #65
72. I drive an 18 wheeler for a living and I hear crap about Hillary
everyday on the CB. I use to defend her, but not anymore. I do like to point out to these right-wing CB rambos that Hillary was president of the Young Republicans in college. Then I point how great it would be to see John Edwards as our next president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. Yep, my boss went on to say...
that he's received some e-mails that say that Hillary has
"killed hundreds of people"!!!1!

"Yea, Al, the 1st Lady was a SERIAL KILLER, you KNOW better
than that."

I still defend her, I really believe that
ANY democrat will be better than the
'pugligans that are running. Looks like
we may be stuck with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
67. You are not alone
Just wait until Hillary:The Movie starts making the rounds.

I read a review on MotherJones.com this past week after its release that said it isn't about the 90s, it is about "corruption and lies" from 2000 on.

The "VRWC" is ginning up the machines and we will have INTEGRITY HONESTY TRUSTWORTHINESS blasted at us non-stop, 24/7.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
68. While I like Clinton and Obama, Edwards stands a better chance of winning.
This is the main reason that I prefer that he get the nomination. I like what he has to say about American jobs too.
http://www.ontheissues.org/John_Edwards.htm#Jobs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sb5697 Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #68
82. Why does he stand a better chance? I see this a lot but
no one has good justification. I suspect it's the obvious but no one has the guts to say it--he's a white male, because it's certainly not his issues and credibility. His congressional voting record is just as suspect as Hillary's. If he can't get his message across now and get more than 5% of the vote what makes you think he would be any better in a general election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #82
114. Anti-Democrats I know joke about a Clinton or Obama win.
They have nothing bad to say about Edwards except that they don't hear much about him.

The media is framing the race in so many ways. I was for Clark in 2004 because I thought he could beat Bush, had he won the nomination. The media didn't cover his campaign. My reasoning for Edwards are along the same lines now.

All 3 candidates are excellent for different reasons, but Edwards stands a better chance of winning against any Republican. For me, the "white male" factor didn't influence what I thought in 2004 and it doesn't now...not to say it couldn't be a factor for some. I suppose that's why race and gender issues have gotten so much instant press for Clinton and Obama and why they garner so much discussion on this board.

I want a Democrat to win the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutineer Donating Member (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
71. I've said it from Day One
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 06:17 PM by Mutineer
she cannot win a general election. There's too much history, too much hatred with the Clintons. I love the Big Dog. I voted for him twice and wish I could vote for him 2 more times. But I haven't connected with HRC and if I feel that way as a Dem, how the hell are we supposed to attract Indies? We can't. And we won't. And we'll lose. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sb5697 Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #71
85. You're right and it seems people would rather pay attention to their
hopes rather than that staring them right in the face. She has yet to capture the independent vote in the primaries (factual). Now how is she going to get it in the GE....some people are thinking and voting with their emotions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
75. Do you think they let Republican women vote?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iktomiwicasa Donating Member (942 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
78. Makes me happy...
...that I'm not a duhmurican. You people have a choice between bad and worse, dumb and dumber. Your problem is that you folks choose dishonest politicians, and not real leaders. Sorry state of affairs if you ask me. I'll just enjoy sitting back and watching while y'all just consume yourselves. Foolish culture, foolish people.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #78
99. It's always refreshing when an FR disciple just ups and outs themself.
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 09:24 AM by BleedingHeartPatriot
Looking at YOUR candidates, is an utter and complete joy for us DUers.

Who on your side sets your heart aflutter, which of those stellar GOPers from which you must pick meets your standards of non dishonest "real leader"?

Thompson? Guiliani? Chuckabee, I mean Huckabee? Wait, I know, MCCAIN! No, no, wait, PAUL!

:rofl: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iktomiwicasa Donating Member (942 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #99
100. I am not...
... a republican by any means. I am a traditionalist Lakota man from Pine Ridge, S. Dakota. Give me ONE good reason why I should have any loyalty to the U.S, or any Duhmurican political party. No, not even close to being a republican....I just dislike the entire U.S. government, as much as you dislike the republicans.

Orrie Bearshield
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #100
101. Then why post here? Why sign up as a member of message board which is designed to provide a
discussion for those of the Democratic wing of politics AND the government, if you have nothing to offer but cynical ridicule?

If you hold that level of antipathy toward those of us who are trying to have an on line dialog with each other, it seems almost counterproductive to your own mental/emotional well being to become a member of that community. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iktomiwicasa Donating Member (942 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #101
102. Oh, I have plenty to say...
...and occasionally someone here listens }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #102
105.  I heard your contempt loud and clear.
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 10:00 AM by BleedingHeartPatriot
MKJ

AND your FR "codeword" for DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iktomiwicasa Donating Member (942 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #105
107. A bit
paranoid, are we? Or are you just blind to the fact that my people have been continuously screwed over by the U.S. government, dem and repubs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #107
113. I know what I read, the words are clear.
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 10:22 AM by BleedingHeartPatriot
MKJ

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #107
130. O.B., you're wasting your breath, but gee...it's fun to watch.
:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Hey, what do you call a white man in
a room full of 400 Indians...?

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sb5697 Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
79. SHALLOW, and many more of you according to your posts. If someone said
they were voting for Obama because her was black you would be raising hell--and rightfully so as that would be shallow also. Further you would say they were a racists. Oh I get it, sexism is ok as long as it's a woman promoting it.....hmmmm. Boy we are in some real trouble. I AM A REAL SUPPORTER OF THE RIGHT PERSON FOR THE JOB. I DON'T GIVE A DAMN IF IT'S A MONKEY. YOU PEOPLE NEED TO GROW UP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sb5697 Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #79
83. PLEASE GIVE ME AN EXAMPLE OF HILLARY UNITING!
Specifically as it relates to drafting and passing legislation. Hell I'll even take legislation that didn't get passed but there was at least a good fight over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
81. Turnout for Dems has been very high. I'm still rooting for Barack but even if it's Hillary it's OK.
Edited on Sun Jan-20-08 06:56 PM by cooolandrew
Taking figues into account we've got it in the bag just what they do with the bag is the worry I'd say now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
86. Get a grip man, we can win with all three top candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
88. Nope. The economy is going to tank. Has to be a
Democrat in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grateful581 Donating Member (760 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
94. Agree
It scares the hell out of me that Hillary is going to be our candidate. People really hate her. The swing voters will go to the republican side if she is our candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #94
111. yea, and Bloomberg is waiting in the wings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
103. Yeah, I'm pretty worried about it too. Because of what corporations
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 09:53 AM by Zorra
and corporate media have done to the Dem Party, I'm thinking it's all a set up.

The republicans are in such disfavor that the only possible way for us to lose is by nominating exactly the wrong candidate.

So, is corporate America sponsoring that candidate? Is the MSM promoting that candidate?

I don't believe that my fears are unwarranted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
104. If Hillary wins this is totally a set up for another big fall for the Demcratic party.
they (neo cons and repigs) have been planning for this. Do you really think that these thugs want another Clinton in the WH, after how they got after Bill's a$$. Think about it.

Edwards is the best choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
112. Then you, like the majority of the people in this country
are basing presidential decisions on fifteen years worth of media generated hate.

Why do you hate Clinton? Is it because of her policies? Or because you have come to
believe the tale that she is "unlikable"? She's too shrill?

WTF? Are citizens of our country so brain dead that they have lost all reasoning
skills?

The Hillary hatred started when Richard Mellon Scaife began his personal, well funded
vendetta against both Clintons because of his supremely arrogant belief that in his
eyes they were unfit for office. (This from a wealthy scumbag now undergoing a divorce
for adultery with a hooker in a 45.00 a night hotel) David Brock, who used to belong to
the right wing hit squad that started it all, says that Scaife paid him to dig up dirt
on them both.

I was not a Hillary supporter until recently. But she is a fighter and what we need in
this country now is a person of either sex who can take on all this mindless bullshit
and call out the best in people by showing them how to be fearless, competent and
strong in the face of such appalling hatred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
557188 Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
116. Everyone hates Bush...
Say what you want about stolen elections but the race should've never been close enough to steal in the first place.

This whole Hillary will bring out people voting against her is nonsense and won't effect the national election at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
118. THE LEFTOFTHEDIAL GUARANTEE!
We will lose in 2008. It is a dead nuts certainty. The question is how badly we will lose.

Either of the corporate-annointed Democratic candidates or any repuke and WE LOSE! It's just a matter of how badly.

Corporate rule will be further entrenched no matter which candidate of either party wins.

No matter who wins in 2008, WE LOSE!

Have a nice day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #118
123. Will America EVER get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
124. HRC can only be stopped by Obama
HRC and diebold can't be beat. Corporations will side with her over Mac or Mitt. I doubt Ghouls could beat her either.

So if you are really worried about us losing, please don't be. HRC will be the next President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
127. This is the strongest field of candidates that I can remember...
The GOP field is a bunch of goons. And we're in the strongest position as a party to win.

If we lose in November it's our own damn faults for not getting our shit together, listening to the polls and pundits, bickering over stupid shit, and letting the big bucks do the talking.

I'm voting for the nominee, then ditching my party affiliation. Whatever happens, I wash my hands of it. Even if we win, Dems are damaged goods. The party that continually fails to meet even a low and reasonable set of expectations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC