Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Authority to conduct warrantless electronic surveillance comes from the Constitution and is vital "

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:32 PM
Original message
"Authority to conduct warrantless electronic surveillance comes from the Constitution and is vital "
Republicans: FISA authority in Constitution

By Bill Gertz
January 21, 2008

Authority to conduct warrantless electronic surveillance comes from the Constitution and is vital to stopping foreign terrorist attacks and spies, says a Republican staff assessment of the revised Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

"There is nothing new or aggressive about relying on Article II authority in the context of foreign intelligence surveillance," stated the assessment produced by the office of Sen. Christopher S. Bond, Missouri Republican and vice chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

The 13-page assessment counters Democrats and other critics of the Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP) who argued during a Senate filibuster of the legislation last month that electronic spying is illegal, began before the September 11 attacks, and that the program spied improperly on domestic telephone and electronic communications.

"There is no evidence to substantiate claims about warrantless spying on Americans prior to the 9/11 terrorist attacks," the report stated. "Nor is there any evidence to substantiate the claim that the TSP covered domestic calls between friends, neighbors and loved ones. As the president has stated, the TSP involved the collection of international calls involving members of al Qaeda."

...

http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080121/NATION/884596216/1001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course there's
no evidence. It's been methodically destroyed for the last 5 years. We're screwn nonetheless. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They are just keeping you safe from Al Qaeda, trust them n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. I believe it is in the Constitution that Warrants ARE REQUIRED
to search any American's person property or papers. Talking apples and oranges here. He is saying foreign persons can be searched without warrant and yet they are searching Americans.. Yes listening in on phone conversations is Searching.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. No evidence is not evidence of no occurrence
But Bond isn't really looking for evidence, is he? And as long as he doesn't find any evidence of warrantless spying on Americans, he can continue to delude himself that it's not happening. I don't know who else he thinks he's fooling, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC