Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plan for Designated Protest Space on DC Mall Debated

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:19 PM
Original message
Plan for Designated Protest Space on DC Mall Debated
Plan for Designated Protest Space on DC Mall Debated
by Michael E. Ruane


Washington - The National Park Service envisions a prime venue for demonstrations: a broad space at the foot of the Capitol with restrooms, seating, a paved surface, even a stand for the media.0121 05Lawyers for activist groups fear a designated, government-approved “pit,” limiting freedom of speech and movement in a hallowed place of protest.

The proposal to turn Union Square, the site of the Capitol reflecting pool and the Grant Memorial, into an urban civic square is one of many ideas the Park Service is mulling as it plans the future of the Mall.

But that and other suggested changes have sparked harsh debate between government officials seeking to preserve one of the country’s most heavily used national parks and activists concerned about limits on free speech and civil rights.

The face-off prompted tense exchanges at a public meeting this month as well as demands for the Park Service to halt its planning and seek broader public input.

“This is a sugar-coating effort to conceal the real plan, which is to reorganize the Mall from its traditional venue as the heart and soul of this country’s free-speech protest movement,” said Brian Becker, national coordinator of Answer, an antiwar coalition.

Susan Spain, project executive for the National Mall Plan, countered: “We are not seeking to restrict First Amendment demonstrations whatsoever.”

The Park Service requires permits for most demonstrations and has “reasonable time, place and manner restrictions” for them, she said. What is proposed is only a better place to protest, with more facilities, she said.

But lawyer Mara Verheyden-Hilliard of the Partnership for Civil Justice, which advocates for protest groups, noted that the Capitol might not always be the protesters’ target.

Demonstrators “also want to be able to protest as far back as they need and as wide as they need,” she said. “They have the right to . . . not be shunted off to a protest pit.”

more...

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/01/21/6518/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. And they could name it after MLK.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. it's all about controlling the unwashed rabble citizens - they are so inconvenient nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Right to Peaceful Assembly
Is something the American People should never have budged a single freaking inch on. Not the labor unions, not the hippies, not the Freepers, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. The "freepers" started that war by asserting the 'danger of distraction',...
,...while spewing the most obnoxious hatred out the other side of their mouths.

The 'freepers' wanted prohibitions in practically ANY public ground stating, "it distracted" workers or drivers or school kids,...whom and whatever they could come up with.

It's the 'freepers' game' right now,...but, what happens when the ship heads toward the sunrise rather than the sunset? They'll be screaming and crying like two-year olds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I Was Writing About Anti-Abortion Protesters
And "Free speech zones."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. The picture that came to mind was of a glass cube Smoking Room in the Spokane
airport I saw years ago. Caged animals.

It's OUR fucking country - we can demonstrate wherever the fuck we want! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yep, until it's deemed illegal. Seems like it might be headed that way. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. This is not America.... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. 5th Anniversary of my very 1st major anti-war protest in Seattle, WA.
I reflect on that day with enormous warmth and appreciation.

Immediately thereafter, every friggin' Republican nationwide proposed ANY restriction imaginable on 'free speech'.

So, this latest obstacle is not surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. These additional limits on our freedom to express ourselves are getting LOST,...
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 04:22 PM by sicksicksick_N_tired
,...among the riff-raff of crap having nothing to do with our IMMEDIATE NEED to express ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is what protest should look like (1969)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Wow! Wall to wall people! The good old days when the media
actually covered rallies like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. and not "penned in" or tasered.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC