Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two Views on Ending the War -- Or Continuing It Maybe Forever

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 04:35 PM
Original message
Two Views on Ending the War -- Or Continuing It Maybe Forever
Two Views on Ending the War -- Or Continuing It Maybe Forever
Michael Gordon (of the Times) and Andrew Bacevich (in the Post) fundamentally disagree on the "surge" and the urgency to extract the U.S. from Iraq as soon as feasible.

By Greg Mitchell

(January 20, 2008) -- Old reliable Michael Gordon of The New York Times, who helped bring us this war, explained today in the paper's Week in Review what's wrong with all of the Democratic candidates' plans for a phased withdrawal from Iraq.

His prime assumption, as always, is that only the U.S. can save the Iraqis from each other. Umm, I believe we have spent thousands of lives, billions of dollars, and almost five years training a very large Iraqi army and police force?

Gordon once got his wrists slapped by his bosses for endorsing the surge on Charlie Rose.

Now he lamely declares, in shooting down the argument for a timetable for withdrawal in 2009, that "if the Iraqis know that American forces are on their way out regardless of what they do, would they be more likely to respond by overcoming their differences or by preparing for the sectarian blood bath that might follow?"

Well, they could do both: But it's up to them. It's their country, and their citizens.

For a more sane commentary, try the redoubtable Andrew Bacevich at The Washington Post today. Bacevich, a former military officer, is one of the sharpest analysts (who also happens to have lost a son in Iraq, unlike virtually anyone else who writes about the war).

His opinion piece is titled "Surge to Nowhere," and carries this deck: "Don't buy the hawks' hype. The war may be off the front pages, but Iraq is broken beyond repair, and we still own it."

more...

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/pressingissues_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003699323

Bacevich's article here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2734948&mesg_id=2734948
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. The US economy has been on a war footing for 70 yrs
so the military-industrial complex can bleed the country dry. We could cut the Pentagon's budget in half and we would still spend more than every other nation on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC